Can someone please explain how the club is in a stronger position by having him sign a new contract with a release clause? Above just accepting a bid we are happy with either this year or next.
Thanks,
Dim from Devon.
I don't get what the benefit to kane is for signing a new contract (if he wants to go) even with a release clause in it, he has 3 years left on his current contract, each day passes his value decreases.
Can someone please explain how the club is in a stronger position by having him sign a new contract with a release clause? Above just accepting a bid we are happy with either this year or next.
Thanks,
Dim from Devon.
No he isn't!!!I know Gerrard didn't skip training or anything but he was close to joining Chelsea but it didn't happen and he's probably their biggest ever legend now.
Wouldn’t that be the case if we decide not to sell him?
dragon1 said: regarding HK
they withdrew the fine after initial discussions with Harry sat
What I was told was that he asked for the extra time off and was told no but still took it anyway
The club let the story run as they have been livid largely with Charlie , harry annoyed them with the neville interview pre the villa game when we had a chance of cl or Uefa football he also pissed the dressing room off
Charlie has been leaking to there media the sun showbiz thing was all him as were all the sky and other media stuff , Daniel had had enough
Paul miller is very well connected both with the club and certain players in this case he is giving a statement from the Kane families side of things , the biggest thing you should take from that is that the Kane family are open to discussing a new deal with spurs
I can say with some certainty that one of two things will happen between now and the 23rd of Aug , either Kane will be sold for 160 million plus and Fab will have a good week to spend it in the window or Kane will sign a massive contract I do not believe the club want to do this all over again next summer its not good for Kane or Spurs
"Paul miller is very well connected both with the club and certain players in this case he is giving a statement from the Kane families side of things , the biggest thing you should take from that is that the Kane family are open to discussing a new deal with spurs"
Can someone please explain how the club is in a stronger position by having him sign a new contract with a release clause? Above just accepting a bid we are happy with either this year or next.
Thanks,
Dim from Devon.
Depends what we can do with the team whilst keeping him, in my book.Not sure how anyone else feels, but fuck giving Kane a new contract!
Can someone please explain how the club is in a stronger position by having him sign a new contract with a release clause? Above just accepting a bid we are happy with either this year or next.
Thanks,
Dim from Devon.
No he isn't!!!
If the Clause is 160mil, that's not the minimum, it's the maximum.Well Dim for Devon. If the clause is for say £160m then that’s the minimum fee.
The financial troubles may continue in which case there will be no takers - or they could blow over in which case clubs in Europe might come in and offer more. Lever would be astute enough to have a lower clause off foreign clubs.
Additionally we get to keep the best striker in the premiership for another season. We may have another poor season and we’d sell for the release clause or have a great season and he’ll want to stay.
Winner Winner Cock for Dimmer
If the Clause is 160mil, that's not the minimum, it's the maximum.
If he has a clause stating he can leave if a club offers 160mil, no one is going to offer more than they have to