- Aug 22, 2013
- 547
- 1,561
He's not one I hear much chat about on here, to be honest. Any chance he makes it with us, or has a decent career at a slightly lower level?
Known as Akhamric. Scored 2 goals on Saturday. Often sub but makes an impression.He's not one I hear much chat about on here, to be honest. Any chance he makes it with us, or has a decent career at a slightly lower level?
Looks like he has been subbed at half time.Former Spurs schoolboy Noni Madueke is not enjoying a glittering return to English football. He's been absolutely abysmal for Chelsea.
He was nowhere near ready that transfer. He'd been mildly decent for PSV, nothing more.Looks like he has been subbed at half time.
I don't think he's homegrown, so for that reason I would imagine you wouldn't be in the squad at all.Is josh Kelly good enough to be in first team squad next season
I don't think he's homegrown, so for that reason I would imagine you wouldn't be in the squad at all.
I *think* he'll still count as U21 next season so could potentially be 3rd choice assuming he's rated higher than Whiteman or Austin. That said of if we think he's got genuine potential I'd have thought another loan at a higher level would be better.I don't think he's homegrown, so for that reason I would imagine you wouldn't be in the squad at all.
Not in UEFA comps unfortunately. Youi have to have been at the club for 2 years consecutive without a loan or 3 years with a maximum of 1 year out on loan. Keeley had been with us for 18 months prior to his loan to Barnet.I *think* he'll still count as U21 next season so could potentially be 3rd choice assuming he's rated higher than Whiteman or Austin. That said of if we think he's got genuine potential I'd have thought another loan at a higher level would be better.
I've been busy googling him as his name was new to me. After 10 minutes fruitless research I now realise you mean Josh Keeley.Is josh Kelly good enough to be in first team squad next season
Yep, should have specified that was for domestic only. That's going to catch a few more players as well e.g. Phillips, Bergvall and Veliz will all be U21 domestically but will have to go into the "senior" squad as either homegrown (Phillips) or overseas (Bergvall, Veliz) in Europe. With Skipp as our only half-decent club-trained senior option our European squad next season could be a bit of a mess, frankly.Not in UEFA comps unfortunately. Youi have to have been at the club for 2 years consecutive without a loan or 3 years with a maximum of 1 year out on loan. Keeley had been with us for 18 months prior to his loan to Barnet.
I think we will probably just not register Bergvall and Veliz for CL.Yep, should have specified that was for domestic only. That's going to catch a few more players as well e.g. Phillips, Bergvall and Veliz will all be U21 domestically but will have to go into the "senior" squad as either homegrown (Phillips) or overseas (Bergvall, Veliz) in Europe. With Skipp as our only half-decent club-trained senior option our European squad next season could be a bit of a mess, frankly.
If you’re right he’d be U21 for PL but for European competition would need to be included in NHG A list quota. In which case the loan has actually prevented him from being included in the B list next season.I *think* he'll still count as U21 next season so could potentially be 3rd choice assuming he's rated higher than Whiteman or Austin. That said of if we think he's got genuine potential I'd have thought another loan at a higher level would be better.
I think prioritising his long-term development is the right thing to do, though. No point having a B-list eligible or club-trained player who's not good enough because we've messed up their development by keeping them playing U21 football when they've outgrown it.If you’re right he’d be U21 for PL but for European competition would need to be included in NHG A list quota. In which case the loan has actually prevented him from being included in the B list next season.