- May 13, 2015
- 907
- 3,383
I certainly agree with some of what you’re saying but I have a far simplistic view of the game that perhaps others don’t. Are Arsenal, Liverpool, City etc where they are because of their identity and style of play or is it because the current managers were afforded sufficient funds to overhaul the quality of their teams? Personally I think it’s the latter. There is a fine line between good managers/teams and great managers/teams. I feel that there are various ways of winning football matches but ultimately if you have better players then you will have a better chance than others. For that reason I feel that we cannot take the approach of just playing a certain way until we are the perfect team. There needs to be a balance, we are not good enough to play as open and expansive as we do. We have had some atrocious performances and results of late. Will continuing to play that way reap the results we want because we are establishing an identity? Will Ange or any other manager be given 100m to spend on a CDM, or 75m on a CB? I seriously doubt it, for that reason any manager at Tottenham will need to cut their cloth accordingly.They do, but not before they have an established style of playing and identity.
The major issue we have since Pochettino left is we have no identity.
Arsenal have an identity, Man C have an identity, Liverpool have an identity. They all have a signature way of playing. What do we have?
The only way you create an identity is through relentlessly pursuing that way of playing. Arsenal had some terrible results over the last four years. We all had a great laugh at them but they stuck to it. Now they can afford to mix things up a bit because they have an established way of playing. Whereas we lurch from one thing to the other because we don’t have the patience to see something out.