- Nov 6, 2006
- 6,793
- 6,446
So we were all rosy before ENIC? That's common sense to you?
Nothing in my post mentioned Alan Sugar. You are arguing with yourself.
So we were all rosy before ENIC? That's common sense to you?
Nothing in my post mentioned Alan Sugar. You are arguing with yourself.
There is a flaw in our club since Enic took over and it’s not the Manager.
This is where your black and white argument falls down. We have improved on and off the pitch since ENIC took over.
I can understand people thinking we could be doing even better or more funds need to be available to the first team squad but making out things are terrible under ENIC makes posts look one sided nonsense rather than adults weighing up a situation in a balanced, fair way.
No, you said
Insinuating that everything was okay pre Enic and since they've come in this has been a flawed tenure, it's not what you said, it's what you're insinuating.
So compare where we were pre Enic to now what flaws can you see particularly compared to the previous regime.
Oh so now I was insinuating!
I either said it or I didn't. And I didn't.
My point is your posts never come across as balanced. They just say ENIC bad, manager not at fault.I didn't say we hadn't improved.
I didn't say things were terrible under ENIC.
Try reading exactly what was posted instead of making it up.
There is nothing balanced or fair about your response and it's pathetic that your response is arrogant enough to suggest adults conduct themselves differently. Listen to any of the broadcasts on at the moment and you will see that outside of this forum people are able to see that a lack of investment has undermined Pochettino. That's just COMMON SENSE.
Mourinho is certainly an ambitious move. Many thought we would look to a cheaper, lower profile manager like Howe or a manager making a step up from a league with considerably less funds.ENIC bought themselves time they didn’t have appointing Mourinho. So Enic in for now. Go out and win the CL and the sell the club.
My point is your posts never come across as balanced. They just say ENIC bad, manager not at fault.
The post you responded said it is fair to say more funds could have been put into the first team squad.
I have never read a post from you giving a balanced view. You just talk about the bad from one party, usually ENIC.
I agree. I think there's a stronger argument that ENIC ask too much from managers with not enough backing.How can bringing in a new coach on 15m a year ,who is an egotistic serial winner not be seen as ambitious?
Enic in , ofc.....
Enic -DL make many mistakes, but lack of ambition ? i don't believe so.
I agree. I think there's a stronger argument that ENIC ask too much from managers with not enough backing.
I didn't say we hadn't improved.
I didn't say things were terrible under ENIC.
Try reading exactly what was posted instead of making it up.
There is nothing balanced or fair about your response and it's pathetic that your response is arrogant enough to suggest adults conduct themselves differently. Listen to any of the broadcasts on at the moment and you will see that outside of this forum people are able to see that a lack of investment has undermined Pochettino. That's just COMMON SENSE.
In 5.5 years, Levy invested ~£100m in the playing squad. The rest were made up by sales.My problem with this argument is he has spent 58 million on Janssen, GNK, and Sissoko.
110 million on Sanchez, Gazzaniga, Foyth, Aurier, Moura, and Llorente.
100 million on Sess, Lo Celso, Ndombele, and Clarke.
That's 268 million on an entire starting eleven, plus two subs, and not one is a nailed on first choice.
It's not the amount spent but his inability to adequately replace Walker/Dembele, and now Rose, Eriksen, Toby, and Jan that's been the problem as 268 million should have been more than enough for that.
In 5.5 years, Levy invested ~£100m in the playing squad. The rest were made up by sales.