The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 25 June 2011

[Bill_Oddie]

But we can say this, yeah?



Just checking on the rules. Thanks. :up:

Oh come on, the man's 93 years of age. He's probably talking about Archie Bunker from 'All in the Family'.

Don't worry about my integrity, I never had any in the first place!

Those who doubt, book in to a trip to Marbella next weekend and go to bentleys club on the Friday night, or ocean club on the Saturday ;-)

Seriously though as I said it's just chat from a player, nothing more or less, and I wouldn't make it up for popularity, whether anything comes off or not remains to be seen, but I never once said any one was signing. Some posters seem to take what's posted and come up with their own result!!

Personal opinion is that I'm not over whelmed with anything I've been told!!

I don't want this to drag out but it's not so much about you, mate. You're big enough (quite literally :wink to look after yourself but posts like those made about your info put off other people from sharing kosher info that literally thousands of people come here to find. People who might donate and keep SC running. I know it all seems a laugh but knocking a poster (ITK or not) isn't on, even if you don't believe or appreciate what they say.

Anyway, quiet day, eh?

 

[rebrab]

Anyone who calls Shanks a wum is an idiot anyway, the bloke has about twenty thousand posts and wouldn't bother making stuff up because he's not a complete ****

Spoiler

he's got parts missing!

 

[alex3]

Anyone who calls Shanks a wum is an idiot anyway, the bloke has about twenty thousand posts and wouldn't bother making stuff up because he's not a complete ****

Spoiler

he's got parts missing!

and he explained that it was he's mate who told him this info

 

[codspur]

Anyone who calls Shanks a wum is an idiot anyway, the bloke has about twenty thousand posts and wouldn't bother making stuff up because he's not a complete ****

Spoiler

he's got parts missing!

and he explained that it was he's mate who told him this info

And we like him...so stick that in your naffing pipe and smoke it :shake:

 

[rebrab]

And we like him...so stick that in your naffing pipe and smoke it :shake:

hey hey, I like shanks too! :beer:

 

[agrdavidsfan]

Just had a huge rush had the database error for times in a row and thought some huge news had came out but then the site loaded

 

[DFF]

Oh come on, the man's 93 years of age. He's probably talking about Archie Bunker from 'All in the Family'.

But jokes aside, if you look back at the thread, there's no doubt he's bashing Archibald the ITK from SO.

Archie on SO Re: Palacios and Kaboul to PSG

Oh, this is good timing. So this is where we can say fuck him, right? Just wanna be clear on which ITKs we can bash and which ones we can't.

BTW, if this is true this will be the biggest mistake in Harry's tenure.

 

[marvel]

But jokes aside, if you look back at the thread, there's no doubt he's bashing Archibald the ITK from SO.



Oh, this is good timing. So this is where we can say fuck him, right? Just wanna be clear on which ITKs we can bash and which ones we can't.

BTW, if this is true this will be the biggest mistake in Harry's tenure.

Sellin Palacios will be the biggest mistake in Harry's tenure?

 

[opensaysme]

Sellin Palacios will be the biggest mistake in Harry's tenure?

I agree.

 

[chinaman]

I think he means selling Kaboul is.

 

[DFF]

Sellin Palacios will be the biggest mistake in Harry's tenure?

Sorry, misread the post. Although it wasn't helped by the headline "Palacios and Kaboul to PSG".

Still, selling Palacios is a mistake, in my opinion. Maybe not the biggest Harry's made, which is probably more of an indictment against him than anything.

 

[AngerManagement]

Really don't want to lose Kaboul again, I think he has impressed and shown much potential in his second spell at the club.

Personal opinion only of course, but I would sooner see Dawson leave than Kaboul... I really think Kaboul could grow into a great centre back

 

[Shanks]

So Archie confirming info that I gave yesterday, even though he laughed it off ;-)

The bit about Wilson that is!

 

[DFF]

So say we get Parker. Then what. Parker replaces Sandro, or plays alongside him? The latter seems unlikely in most games. So, what, we alienate Sandro next? Cos Parker ain't coming to sit on the bench.

 

[SpursSince1980]

Why sell kaboul? Do we have a replacement?

 

[marvel]

Sorry, misread the post. Although it wasn't helped by the headline "Palacios and Kaboul to PSG".

Still, selling Palacios is a mistake, in my opinion. Maybe not the biggest Harry's made, which is probably more of an indictment against him than anything.

I agree with you, selling both would be a huge mistake and Palacios could prove to be a mistake. However, the 12-15 million would be very useful

 

[arthurgrimsdell]

More total rubbish! Why do people like you make things up ? All assets (players) have to be declared + high wage earners . Even Fredal was declared -and he was free !

This is from the AIM Regulations:

General disclosure of price sensitive information
11. An AIM company must issue notification without delay of any new developments which
are not public knowledge concerning a change in:
♦ its financial condition;
♦ its sphere of activity;
♦ the performance of its business; or
♦ its expectation of its performance,
which, if made public, would be likely to lead to a substantial movement in the price of its
AIM securities.
Disclosure of corporate transactions
Substantial transactions
12. A substantial transaction is one which exceeds 10% in any of the class tests. It includes
any transaction by a subsidiary of the AIM company but excludes any transactions of a
revenue nature in the ordinary course of business and transactions to raise finance which
do not involve a change in the fixed assets of the AIM company or its subsidiaries.
An AIM company must issue notification without delay as soon as the terms of any
substantial transaction are agreed, disclosing the information specified by Schedule Four.

The class tests for determining the size of a transaction pursuant to rules 12, 13, 14, 15 and 19
are as follows:
The Gross Assets test
Gross assets the subject of the transaction x 100
Gross assets of the AIM company

The Profits test
Profits attributable to the assets the subject of the transaction x 100
Profits of the AIM company

The Turnover test
Turnover attributable to the assets the subject of the transaction x 100
Turnover of the AIM company

The Consideration test
Consideration x 100
Aggregate market value of all the ordinary shares (excluding treasury shares)
of the AIM company
The Gross Capital test
Gross capital of the company or business being acquired x 100
Gross capital of the AIM company


Darkespur is right. You are wrong.
Sorry.

 

[StartingPrice]

Just had a huge rush had the database error for times in a row and thought some huge news had came out but then the site loaded

Exactly.
Something major.
They've locked me out.
Infamy, infamy...they've all got it in for me.

Either, we've signed Messi, or Brett has opened The Joe Cole Wars - Version 2, and they are trying to keep me away from the peace conference (I'm such a hot-head).

 

[rawhide]

This is from the AIM Regulations:

General disclosure of price sensitive information
11. An AIM company must issue notification without delay of any new developments which
are not public knowledge concerning a change in:
♦ its financial condition;
♦ its sphere of activity;
♦ the performance of its business; or
♦ its expectation of its performance,
which, if made public, would be likely to lead to a substantial movement in the price of its
AIM securities.
Disclosure of corporate transactions
Substantial transactions
12. A substantial transaction is one which exceeds 10% in any of the class tests. It includes
any transaction by a subsidiary of the AIM company but excludes any transactions of a
revenue nature in the ordinary course of business and transactions to raise finance which
do not involve a change in the fixed assets of the AIM company or its subsidiaries.
An AIM company must issue notification without delay as soon as the terms of any
substantial transaction are agreed, disclosing the information specified by Schedule Four.

The class tests for determining the size of a transaction pursuant to rules 12, 13, 14, 15 and 19
are as follows:
The Gross Assets test
Gross assets the subject of the transaction x 100
Gross assets of the AIM company

The Profits test
Profits attributable to the assets the subject of the transaction x 100
Profits of the AIM company

The Turnover test
Turnover attributable to the assets the subject of the transaction x 100
Turnover of the AIM company

The Consideration test
Consideration x 100
Aggregate market value of all the ordinary shares (excluding treasury shares)
of the AIM company
The Gross Capital test
Gross capital of the company or business being acquired x 100
Gross capital of the AIM company


Darkespur is right. You are wrong.
Sorry.

Have some rep for bothering to do the research.

 

[agrdavidsfan]

Exactly.
Something major.
They've locked me out.
Infamy, infamy...they've all got it in for me.

Either, we've signed Messi, or Brett has opened The Joe Cole Wars - Version 2, and they are trying to keep me away from the peace conference (I'm such a hot-head).

:lol: I was the same I was like why have I been banned :'(