- Dec 30, 2020
- 6,019
- 10,625
I'm not angryI don’t disagree. Why are you so angry.
I'm not angryI don’t disagree. Why are you so angry.
Skipp was fine and the idea that you'd throw a kid from the academy into that situation is ludicrous. Maybe start Donley but not throw him in to replace a completely gassed Lo Celso and Gil.It wasn't curious at all, people are looking into the Skipp sub waay too much, GLC has recently come back from injury and barely played minutes for us, he started the game and ran his arse off up until he came off. We needed fresh legs, the whole team looked leggy. Yes, the creativity drop off was big because Skipp is a completely different player, but Skipp did make runs beyond Porro/Kulu when he came on, sometimes you drop a more creative player for a runner, have him make runs off defenders and stretch them and create different spaces and chances.
Lo Celso needed to come off as he was tired and we had very little other options from the bench.
Don't know about tiredness, but he was definitely off the pace. He didn't seem aware when the defence crept out a bit when the free-kicks were being taken. I lost count of how many times he was caught offside! Hopefully he'll be able to take a breather this week. We really need him on top form for City!I thought he was a bit off the pace today. Tired from the international break.
Hope so. He’s a bit of Bete Noire to City.Don't know about tiredness, but he was definitely off the pace. He didn't seem aware when the defence crept out a bit when the free-kicks were being taken. I lost count of how many times he was caught offside! Hopefully he'll be able to take a breather this week. We really need him on top form for City!
Thank you! It was driving me crazy who Cash did it to last time. It was Doherty when he finally found some form with us. Just aggressive dangerous tackles unnecessarily And no one says a word.Not sure if it's been mentioned but Cash injured Doherty last year with similar ridiculous challenge.
Had Romero completed those challenges I suspect we would be hearing alot more about them.
I thought Cash set out to injure Bentancur and succeeded.Not sure if it's been mentioned but Cash injured Doherty last year with similar ridiculous challenge.
Had Romero completed those challenges I suspect we would be hearing alot more about them.
Exactly and yet he’s not castigated or criticised by the media on any way as much as Romero was for winning the ball. Neville’s response to both of those tackles was evidently due to preconceived views on both players.I thought Cash set out to injure Bentancur and succeeded.
Don't think people are realising quite how much we pressed in the first half and start of the second, players ran their bollocks off and it worked, should have been 3 clear at half time but we didn't take our chances.
Subs simply HAD to be made, you play this kind of super intense football, players are knackered come the 60 minute mark, this is where the injuries play their part because with a fully fit squad you have players like Gio, Sarr, Richy, Perisic, Gil, Solomon etc to come on, mostly all players that can come on and keep that intensity and pressing up without losing too much quality from the starting XI.. We're severely lacking that energy off the bench right now.
But the philosophy should not change, it's working, we've just hit a point of shit luck and injuries but we'll come out of it.
Love Ange and he may have had a reason to bring Skipp on but it was less than obvious why. Having any two (god forbid 3) of Eric, Hojbjerg and Skip in there right now and you are asking for sideways/negative football. PIerre did have moments today but he isn't consistently progressive enough.
Skipp may or may not come good but some seem to forget he is 22 and his first year of first team football was Poch's last year. He then cut his teeth under Jose and Antonio which means that he is playing in an approach that he hasn't played as an adult.
It was a curious decision and i would have much rather had him put Veliz in. We were attacking and getting corners. would be curious to hear if there is any more explanation on it. onwards and upwards with a few sideways and backwards moments
It wasn't curious at all, people are looking into the Skipp sub waay too much, GLC has recently come back from injury and barely played minutes for us, he started the game and ran his arse off up until he came off. We needed fresh legs, the whole team looked leggy. Yes, the creativity drop off was big because Skipp is a completely different player, but Skipp did make runs beyond Porro/Kulu when he came on, sometimes you drop a more creative player for a runner, have him make runs off defenders and stretch them and create different spaces and chances.
Lo Celso needed to come off as he was tired and we had very little other options from the bench.
That's the worst poem I've ever read!Difficult not to see this as a downward turning point
after 3 consecutive losses.
But we must.
Only a third of the season gone and steady in 5th.
though with City immediately ahead
and a mixed bag of fixtures before Xmas.
We deserved at least a draw against Villa,
Sonny scored a hat-trick of narrow offsides
Kulu hit the post and both Davies and Johnson
had excellent chances missed or saved.
Once again the football was terrific.
but our defence struggled with key figures missing.
Nobody picked up Watkins for the winner
and Pau had warned us earlier before he scored.
The old set piece bogey struck again.
The squad is not good enough but we know that.
I am disappointed but hopeful
though top four might be an ambition too far.