- Aug 9, 2008
- 5,844
- 6,751
You have your opinion, but I think it's with rose tinted specs.
Elaborate as I dont fully understand your meaning friend.
You have your opinion, but I think it's with rose tinted specs.
Elaborate as I dont fully understand your meaning friend.
Maybe he's being brought in to replace Charlie because we got a good offer for him from Juventus? i mean if we get say 7-9 million for Charlie and get Neville for 2 million theres more money to put towards a striker. It would seem like something Levy would do.
Sound business sense. Sell Corluka for a decent sum, get neville in for next to nothing. Experience and leadership both in training and on the field. He can play left back, right back, CM and at a push CB.
I think we should do away with youth policy since we have abandoned it or at the least, stop pretending that we still have one.
How have we abandoned the youth policy? Currently in the first team squad we have;
Gareth Bale, Aaron lennon, Tom Huddlestone, Michael Dawson, BAE, Sandro all brought into the club as youngesters.
We have out on loan;
Kyle Walker, Kyle Naughton, Danny Rose, John Obika, John Bostock, Jake livermore, Andros Townsend (just recalled), Steven Caulker, Harry Kane, Paul-Jose M'Poku and others I have probably missed.
How have we abandoned our youth policy?
Again, 33-35 year olds is not really the trend is it? get a grip man, we've signed one 33 year old defender who has proven to be a good purchase and we've attempted to loan one of the most role model professionals on a very short loan. hardly setting a trend.But if we keep signing the over 33 years of age, we might as well do away with youth policy. Moreover, i am not saying that we have abandoned it yet but might as well, if the trend is to buy the 33-35 years old.
The theme I am really reading here is based on Bale. According to most of you Maicon isn't worthy of Bath F.C. while Neville might be better than Roberto Carlos, based on 3 games. That's you're sample pool and this is definitely you're outcome Neville>Maicon.
I'm not saying that we are in for Maicon, where its a choice, only that you've made some ludicrous assumptions based on performances against Bale.
Phil Neville is 34 in a week. 34! His mate is 35. Harry brought us an inconsistent 33 year old defender. He wants 30 year old Parker and 32 year old Anelka.
It's not a worrying trend. It's a disturbing one. One guy to help the training room is great. This many is bad for a team built on speed and counter.
Again, 33-35 year olds is not really the trend is it? get a grip man, we've signed one 33 year old defender who has proven to be a good purchase and we've attempted to loan one of the most role model professionals on a very short loan. hardly setting a trend.
And about to sign a 35years Beckham (one i am happy) but please not another over 30's, we are not Pompey.
The theme I am really reading here is based on Bale. According to most of you Maicon isn't worthy of Bath F.C. while Neville might be better than Roberto Carlos, based on 3 games. That's you're sample pool and this is definitely you're outcome Neville>Maicon.
I'm not saying that we are in for Maicon, where its a choice, only that you've made some ludicrous assumptions based on performances against Bale.
Phil Neville is 34 in a week. 34! His mate is 35. Harry brought us an inconsistent 33 year old defender. He wants 30 year old Parker and 32 year old Anelka.
It's not a worrying trend. It's a disturbing one. One guy to help the training room is great. This many is bad for a team built on speed and counter.
The theme I am really reading here is based on Bale. According to most of you Maicon isn't worthy of Bath F.C. while Neville might be better than Roberto Carlos, based on 3 games. That's you're sample pool and this is definitely you're outcome Neville>Maicon.
I'm not saying that we are in for Maicon, where its a choice, only that you've made some ludicrous assumptions based on performances against Bale.
Phil Neville is 34 in a week. 34! His mate is 35. Harry brought us an inconsistent 33 year old defender. He wants 30 year old Parker and 32 year old Anelka.
It's not a worrying trend. It's a disturbing one. One guy to help the training room is great. This many is bad for a team built on speed and counter.
When I first heard about this, I was abit mg:!! I thought, Phil Neville, the Phil Neviile! mg:
But now I am coming around to the idea more. Even more so since speaking to one of my members of staff this morning who is a season ticket holder at Everton who sees him play pretty much week in week out, probably more than any of us see him play.
He would be gutted to loose him, in his words "he has been our best captain for quite some time"
So experience wise, you have to bear in mind that we are heading into our most crucial run in for years, with 4th - 1st place in the PL being up for grabs, a last 16 place in the CL against AC Milan coming soon and the continuation of the FA cup. It really does seem to be a no brainer.
We may loose Charlie, but we still have Hutton who in my opinion has performed a very good job since coming back into the team, and also it now looks like Kyle Walker may be fast tracked into the Squad for next season after going to Villa on loan.
This seems like a shrewd piece of business by Harry.
I think he deserves our backing on this, no?
Phil Neviile may come in and do a good job but how many more over 30's can we accomodate in our squad,short termism policy, it smacks of where a mixeture of long term and short term will be ideal.( just an opinion and is not end of the world)
Phil Neviile may come in and do a good job but how many more over 30's can we accomodate in our squad,short termism policy, it smacks of where a mixeture of long term and short term will be ideal.( just an opinion and is not end of the world)