- Sep 28, 2013
- 16,163
- 25,473
Point is why the red line is thicker than the blue... As though just trying to prove a point its offside.Why does the red line start from the bottom right corner of the vertical squares down but the blue does not.
Point is why the red line is thicker than the blue... As though just trying to prove a point its offside.Why does the red line start from the bottom right corner of the vertical squares down but the blue does not.
I’d say so.Have i missed something?
True and the number of chances we are conceding is alarming. With that said, Leicester away was never going to be an easy game and considering we had a CL game on Wednesday, I thought we controlled the game very well and limited Leicester to mostly half chances all game.We were unfortunate with the decisions but we still gave up a crazy number of chances and they had 16 shots. We can’t defend and Poch thought Wanyama and Eriksen were the answers
Don't worry they are shite we win that game by two or three goals
Is this not a results based industry? Isn’t that why we are paying him?
Sorry mate. With all due respect, you’ve been chatting complete and utter nonsense post match and I’m not prepared to enter into a debate with you when i categorically disagree.Undone by VAR? Bollocks. We should have pushed on regardless. And the game is never over at 2-0.
They also had a goal disallowed by VAR. You could just as easily say if they went 1-0 it would have been a different game.Undone by VAR? Bollocks. We should have pushed on regardless. And the game is never over at 2-0.
The performance was generally fine. I thought we were much quicker on the counter and moved the ball well. With Aurier in it's much much better.You didn’t think the performance was decent? For me if we go 2-0 up we go on to win. The VAR decision changed the game. Maybe I’m glass half full but I can’t really slag off the players today (other than 1-2).
Well if you were sure I've been chatting shit, undo it with an argument of your own which disproved what's been said?Sorry mate. With all due respect, you’ve been chatting complete and utter nonsense post match and I’m not prepared to enter into a debate with you when i categorically disagree.
Poch is at fault again. Poor and naive tactics and decisions:
Poch continues to have our players way up the pitch, no defending as a team and leaving it all up to Toby and Verts to save the day when the oppo steal the ball and counter. A totally foolish strategy.
Liverpool and City have Fabinho and Rodri sitting deep and one of the other two staying central. We had Ndombele running up the left wing! And Winks was all over the place when he should have stayed central. All this while our full backs are right up the pitch.
Subs: Why take Sissoko off at all? Why bring on Lucas with 5 minutes left? What was the strategy there? Eriksen came on and added nothing.
Surely Poch can drill players on not playing cavalier blind passes. Rose giving the ball away three times in the last 5 minutes was ridiculous. Some pathetic stuff on show today by a few players, but Poch's lack of tactics means we need someone who is more calculated imo.
We play colchester midweek, I think resting players in that game would be a good idea for fresh legs looking to the weekend game. Playing midweek then having the early kick off this weekend was always going to see us being tired in the second half of this game.Normally I’d agree, but I really can’t be confident of anything with this team at the moment.
I knew as soon as that VAR decision went against us we’d lose. If we go behind next week we won’t get anything out the game.
The analysis on BT Sport quite rightly highlighted that Aurier was the problem in defense - he'd leave huge gaps so everyone would have to come across. He left our defence in the poop a couple of times - one of which lead to Ricardo's goal.We were unfortunate with the decisions but we still gave up a crazy number of chances and they had 16 shots. We can’t defend and Poch thought Wanyama and Eriksen were the answers
In this instance, there isn't a perceptible offside to call. Even with the benefit of slow mo, stills, red and blue lines, whatever. It was a fucking absurd call to make because there's nothing there based a single frames, microseconds, to determine he's actually ahead of the last defender.Why is it a disgrace? Don’t get when people/pundits say this. He was offside, by an elbow or 5 feet it doesn’t matter. The rules are the same for both sides