I missed @Snuzzy's post (I duped the suggestion) and your reply, apologies.I’ve explained above why keeping the ITK forum is important. If you don’t use it, it’s not “for” you, which is fair enough but we don’t want to lose it.
Banned in what way?Any chance the posting of aggregators without the original source material could be banned?
I am guilty of it in the past as much as others, but it really is a pain when out of context quotes or not full quotes are posted mostly inaccurately by the aggregator. It doesn't seem as bad this summer so far, but 12 months ago it was so hard to follow the news accurately.
Banned in what way?
It's already part of the rules and very explicit. You shouldn't be posting aggregator accounts.
If we then ban people who keep doing it, we just get a load of PMs whining about the "unfair" bans.
I'd suggest giving people who do it an appropriate rating until they get the message.
Yeah, Chris does a great job but everyone can post in the RO forum so it doesn't just need to be him.
I honestly thought you were pulling it out of the itk thread, that makes a lot of sense though and an agree with you and Rob it shouldn't be just you especially if you're managing to keep us all in the loop through the ticker whilst working.I'm often just refreshing a feed to pull off any media on twitter, so not relevant for the RO.
And most of the time it's when I'm working, so it is just a quick update
Rob and A&C get most of the credit for the ITK section but I just wanted to thank you for the superb work you do with the ticker.I'm often just refreshing a feed to pull off any media on twitter, so not relevant for the RO.
And most of the time it's when I'm working, so it is just a quick update
Yep, if you think it's ITK, post it in there and we'll filter it out.