Marc Van Bommel
- Thread starter chrissivad
- Start date
StartingPrice
Chief Sardonicus Hyperlip
- Feb 13, 2004
- 32,568
- 10,280
Careful, now...criticising Slur Phallus, OT, MUFC, any of their players, their fans, and especially Paul Scholes's ability to make at least 5 yellow card offences per game and never be booked, is a hanging offenceEek
stemark44
Well-Known Member
- Mar 17, 2005
- 6,598
- 1,829
Doesn't anyone else see it?
I remember a game against us when he put 4 of our players at least 3 feet in the air with shocking tackles and wasn't booked.
DoublePivot
Relegated to Lurker
- Jul 1, 2005
- 8,987
- 67
BringBack_leGin
Well-Known Member
- Jul 28, 2004
- 27,719
- 54,929
But we've played those sides and beaten them both in style by simply outshining them and not needing any kind of thuggery.
Definite no for me. This guy is scum of the highest proportion. We're talking Ben Thatcher to the power of Joey Barton.
$hoguN
Well-Known Member
- Jul 25, 2005
- 26,677
- 34,822
I know mate, I don't really want us to play anything but beautiful football
Its quite clear MVB would have his uses for tottenham. giving the team some gravitas, would be a fantastic person to play alongside modric and just amazing amounts of experience in big games.
I just think it would cause problems in the squad, i mean its not worth getting rid of Jenas or Palacios, who won't want to be 5th choice, because in 6-12 months time when father time catches up with van bommel and he cant play for us any more we'd have to sign another midfielder. just doesnt make logical sense because we'd effectively be getting one midfielder now and then have to buy another one in 12-18 months time.
I just think it would cause problems in the squad, i mean its not worth getting rid of Jenas or Palacios, who won't want to be 5th choice, because in 6-12 months time when father time catches up with van bommel and he cant play for us any more we'd have to sign another midfielder. just doesnt make logical sense because we'd effectively be getting one midfielder now and then have to buy another one in 12-18 months time.
van_Pommel
Well-Known Member
- May 10, 2004
- 3,062
- 993
brendanb50
Well-Known Member
- Jul 21, 2005
- 4,488
- 3,895
Not sold on this one. Used to be a very good player but genuinely looks past it these days, seems to resort to hacking the opposition.
danielneeds
Kick-Ass
- May 5, 2004
- 24,182
- 48,812
He's a dirty little so and so, but last season he was at the heart of teams that got to both the Champions League and World Cup final? He would definitely offer us leadership, skill and know how.
stevenurse
Palacios' neck fat
- May 14, 2007
- 6,089
- 10,022
Skill? Come on, he's a prick. We need to think about who he will replace, hudd and luka are our first choice pairing and a very good one at that. I wouldnt want him to come in and disrupt that. We one is injured I don't mind having the others we have to be honest. They aren't the best but are good sub players. United have players like gibson who can come in, we have Wilson. It's fine. A utility player would be good and a left back but I still want a striker
TwoSaintsComeMarching
PIMP-tastic
- Jul 26, 2008
- 2,404
- 454
Huddlestone would learn a lot from him. In terms of imposing himself on the game. I'd welcome him.
bouncebackability
SC Supporter
- May 4, 2005
- 224
- 2
I agree; I think Hudd needs to impose himself physically more in games. I'm not saying he's a lightweight, i just think he doesn't make the most of his stature.
DoublePivot
Relegated to Lurker
- Jul 1, 2005
- 8,987
- 67
Old news. Milan looks his destination where he & Ibra can kill each other and make the world a better place.
steventhfc
See man driving a german whip.
- May 20, 2009
- 2,059
- 818
Gonna whack a tenner on him getting sent off on the 15th.
rockyhotspur
Well-Known Member
- Jul 20, 2008
- 1,098
- 1,052
Similar threads
