- Sep 15, 2015
- 4,192
- 20,067
Maybe, but you can't prove that in any way shape or form and it's not like we won the competition because of him, in fact, he scored with his arm to send us through at one point so we have VAR to thank in reality... He was a GIGANTIC waste of space in the prem and I don't think you can argue otherwise...
Maybe you could argue it would have been good to have Llorente PLUS one other competent (non-lumbering) option up top while Kane was out...and that talent off the bench could have played instead of Kane. I guess it depends what standard of player you expect at the club - particularly for what the fans are made to pay. I don't buy into this target man model - I'd personally rather a mirror of the Aguero/Jesus style of striker setup with Kane + another competent rather than all this Allardyce hoof-ball plan B shtuff.
I mean I can argue otherwise because he scored some crucial goals in the league and in cups. Its not just about the City goal, he turned the Ajax game on it's head cos we were able to play direct. The reason he didn't score more was because of Poohs tactics or the players not going long when it is blindingly obvious that was his game.
No one is saying he should have stayed or even that he is the level we aspire to but there are so many others I could point to last season who were far far worse