What's new

Harry Kane

spids

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2015
6,647
27,841
@Blockbuster you can stick your creative rating where the sun don't shine. If you think I'm making it up at least have the balls to say so. Seriously sick to death of pricks calling us liars and hiding it behind the creative rating.

@Blockbuster has been repetitively neg rating anyone being critical of Kane for the last few days. Now he is consistently doing it to ITKs too. Why he cannot use the disagree emoticon (and even better - post stating why he disagrees) rather than use spam / d'oh / creative emoticons all the time is confusing me.
 

JonnySpurs

SC Veteran
Jun 4, 2004
5,346
12,398
@Blockbuster has been repetitively neg rating anyone being critical of Kane for the last few days. Now he is consistently doing it to ITKs too. Why he cannot use the disagree emoticon (and even better - post stating why he disagrees) rather than use spam / d'oh / creative emoticons all the time is confusing me.

Well he aint gonna be doing any ratings for a while now, I'd imagine ;)
 

King of the Lane

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2010
4,121
23,681
Simon Jordan is just a breath of fresh air. He says it exactly as it is rather than with an agenda or just based off of the reported media bollocks.
 

spids

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2015
6,647
27,841
The emoticons moving to the left makes no difference on a phone anyway. The negative emoticonsstill effectively go all the way across to the right as there are so many emoticons. Right handed fat fingers will still hit them. The better option is to reverse the order so the positive ratings are listed after negative ones
 

Yid121

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
3,467
3,146
@Blockbuster you can stick your creative rating where the sun don't shine. If you think I'm making it up at least have the balls to say so. Seriously sick to death of pricks calling us liars and hiding it behind the creative rating.
He's a WUM so would put him on your ignore list, one of the only users I remember from this site who has either made odd posts or odd ratings, basically an arsenal fan in disguise.

@ Blockbusternone of my details are real ?
 

Gingernut

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2019
1,423
3,518
Fabrizio says on his podcast that Gabriel Jesus has been offered (as well as Laporte) as part of the deal. We’ve said no to players being included previoulsy though.

Must say, Jesus is a striker of very high quality. Don’t think we could do much better on the market. City’s valuation might be off though. I’d say £50m (probably worth a bit more in reality).
I cannot see either accepting to come to us tbh
 

KingNick

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2008
2,179
3,718
Simon Jordan is just a breath of fresh air. He says it exactly as it is rather than with an agenda or just based off of the reported media bollocks.

I can't get my head around how so many ex-Spurs players who have been talking about Kane in the media (Murphy, O'Hara, Sherwood, Ferdinand), all seem to claim to understand what the "fans" think. I think Les was quoted as saying something like 99% of Spurs fans would wish HK well if he moved on! God knows what makes them think they understand "the fans" (having gone to matches as fans when they were kids is not a good point of reference - their careers have meant they are no wholly out of touch) let alone that the fan base would ever be as united in one belief.

As noted on here before, Ramon Vega seems to be the only ex-player who has come close to understanding what i think is probably a majority feeling - although this site also shows that there are fans who are diametrically opposed.
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
Fabrizio says on his podcast that Gabriel Jesus has been offered (as well as Laporte) as part of the deal. We’ve said no to players being included previoulsy though.

Must say, Jesus is a striker of very high quality. Don’t think we could do much better on the market. City’s valuation might be off though. I’d say £50m (probably worth a bit more in reality).

Are you Jesus's agent or Pep?
 

paulbag

Well-Known Member
Aug 6, 2019
216
786
Fabrizio says on his podcast that Gabriel Jesus has been offered (as well as Laporte) as part of the deal. We’ve said no to players being included previoulsy though.

Must say, Jesus is a striker of very high quality. Don’t think we could do much better on the market. City’s valuation might be off though. I’d say £50m (probably worth a bit more in reality).
Jesus is awful wouldnt have him anywhere near us would rather put dane scarlett up front and hes never played in the prem
 

Kingellesar

This is the way
May 2, 2005
8,760
9,251
I don't see the appeal of Jesus, never been that impressed with him. But either way, I think players being involved in the deal looks extremely unlikely now, we want the money and that's the end of it. Pay up or they go find someone else.

I thought they would have gone for someone like Ings for a season until next summer but even he has moved now. Not sure what they will do, probably continue with the false 9.
 

Univarn

Lost. Probably Not Worth Finding.
Jul 20, 2017
2,864
15,279
Fabrizio says on his podcast that Gabriel Jesus has been offered (as well as Laporte) as part of the deal. We’ve said no to players being included previoulsy though.

Must say, Jesus is a striker of very high quality. Don’t think we could do much better on the market. City’s valuation might be off though. I’d say £50m (probably worth a bit more in reality).
Would take Lauturo or Vlahovic over Jesus all day long simply from a system fit. I am completely convinced Jesus has a bit of the yips about him and that's fine when you're at City and you will still get 5 shots a game in the penalty box on an off day. Less so when you are at Spurs and 5 shots would be your best game of the season. He'd be a useful option and rotation but there's a reason Pep opted for no striker last year rather than him despite his other worlds xg+xa p 90 numbers.
 

olliec

Well-Known Member
Jun 20, 2012
3,595
11,800
If Harry does go I dream of seeing a front three of

son Martinez/vlahohic chiesa

that would be pretty devestating.
Sometimes I just don’t get the wtf rating in some posts. I said I dream of seeing a front 3 of the above IF Harry goes. Not sure what’s wrong with that?
 

punky

Gone
Sep 23, 2008
7,485
5,403
Even though I’ve not been happy with him, if Kane signs a massive new deal and stays with us forever I’d be very very happy.

We’re better with him than without, especially if Levy has finally clicked that getting top quality players in And competing in champions league is more portable than being cheap and missing out.

Plus Paratici handling the deals makes me more comfortable than when Levy did it.

Levy has done well with training ground and stadium, but aside from setting a budget ensuring we don’t go stupidly overspending, he needs to leave football playing side to others.

I agree we're better with him even if he is in a strop.

If he signs a new contract without a full, contrite apology to the fans and pledge to do better, I think there will be a cloud that will hover him and perhaps the club. It will be sad to see and a bit uncomfortable.

Presumably he'll make amends privately to his teammates regardless.
 

spids

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2015
6,647
27,841
He's a WUM so would put him on your ignore list, one of the only users I remember from this site who has either made odd posts or odd ratings, basically an arsenal fan in disguise.

@ Blockbusternone of my details are real ?

Does putting someone on ignore also make their emoticon ratings disappear?
 

buttons

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2005
2,945
3,861
Would be all over Laporte and probably Bernardo, but that’s it (of the ‘realistic’ players we could get). I think Jesus is very average and is benefiting from some serious stat padding in a side which creates loads of chances.
 
Top