- Jan 11, 2013
- 7,939
- 13,758
- Thread starter
- #101
england look woeful.
Hopefully they bring one or both of our boys on soon
england look woeful.
willock lacks a brain
Edwards on. But playing out wide
Willock is SO predictable. Receive ball, slow down play, cut inside onto right foot. So easy to defend against.
We'd be far better off getting a young, technically and tactically astute foreign coach for our youth teams than letting dinosaurs like that guy loose on our kids.
there's a decent chance england could still actually go through on 2 points.
3rd place from group a and group d have already qualified. so that leaves c, e and f (england are b). in group c australia(1 point) play argentina(0 points) and you'd probably expect argentina to win so that would see them qualify leaving one place, a draw would see england qualify ahead of australia. group e south africa(1 point) play russia(4 points) and north korea(1 point) play costa rica(4 points), as long as neither south africa or north korea win then we'd qualify ahead of them. lastly in group f, syria(1 point) play france(6 points), highly unlikely syria get a point let alone the win they'd need to qualify ahead of england and new zealand(1 point) play paraguay(4 points), again nz would need to win to finish ahead of england due to goal difference.
having said all of that though, england don't deserve to go through and would likely lose to whoever they face in the next round anyway. i'd rather see edwards and sterling back with spurs playing u21s.
there's a decent chance england could still actually go through on 2 points.
3rd place from group a and group d have already qualified. so that leaves c, e and f (england are b). in group c australia(1 point) play argentina(0 points) and you'd probably expect argentina to win so that would see them qualify leaving one place, a draw would see england qualify ahead of australia. group e south africa(1 point) play russia(4 points) and north korea(1 point) play costa rica(4 points), as long as neither south africa or north korea win then we'd qualify ahead of them. lastly in group f, syria(1 point) play france(6 points), highly unlikely syria get a point let alone the win they'd need to qualify ahead of england and new zealand(1 point) play paraguay(4 points), again nz would need to win to finish ahead of england due to goal difference.
having said all of that though, england don't deserve to go through and would likely lose to whoever they face in the next round anyway. i'd rather see edwards and sterling back with spurs playing u21s.
edit: a draw for south africa would see them qualify ahead of england on goals scored so we're going to need russia to beat them.