What's new

Jose Mourinho

How do you feel about Mourinho appointment

  • Excited - silverware here we come baby

    Votes: 666 46.7%
  • Meh - will give him a chance and hope he is successful

    Votes: 468 32.8%
  • Horrified - praying for the day he'll fuck off

    Votes: 292 20.5%

  • Total voters
    1,426

Bobby TwoShots

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2019
500
1,839
Because it's true? They dropped points, we still have chance for CL. They wouldn't create more chances than us without our help from penalty and Davinson missed header.
Think you're forgetting Lloris pulled off a worldie. But anyway, glad you're happy with a point. I wanted us to bust a gut trying to get all 3.
 

Ionman34

SC Supporter
Jun 1, 2011
7,182
16,793
It’s fair to argue he needs time. But the comparisons with Liverpool and City don’t work. Even when they weren’t successful, they didn’t play the boring football Mourinho offers up. When did it become necessary to play shit football to be successful?
The comparison wasn't mine, it was in response to us being compared to them so...
 

14/04/91

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2006
3,586
5,789
I’m willing to cut Mourinho a bit of slack because 1st half we at least played in a defined way and had we replicated that 2nd half, or at least made the most of a couple of other positive first half situations, we’d have won. The dip was clearly due to fatigue rather than tactical frailty, particularly with Kane and Son who were both at half mast from the start and shot by the end. The error, then, was in selection. He should’ve started just one of those two, and down the middle in Kane’s role whichever one it was, and then swapped the two of them round second half, with Sessegnon in the wide left role that Son occupied. We essentially played 442 with Kane as the 9, Son on the LW and Lamela as a second striker. Had it been Sessegnon from the start with either Kane or Son as the 9, we’d have preserved our press and ability to counter far deeper into the game, as well as have the benefit of either Kane or Son running at tired Utd legs late on. I’m turn, the subs become far simpler too. Lo Celso still for Lamela, Gedson for either of Bergwijn or Sessegnon, and one of Kane or Son for the other, and because we stay in control tactically we can even afford to swap Winks or Sissoko our for Ndombele.

Tactically the set up was fine, but given the obvious fatigue issues in starting all four injury returnees, who all play in the front 6, Mourinho handcuffed himself from being able to persevere with the tactic that was working, a knackered team ended up defending too deep, and a silly penalty, just or not, was the end result.

I’d be happy to continue with the same system, especially with Dele and Lucas returning, but I really think it should be Kane and Son sharing the minutes for the time being, at least for this next match, and for the sake of a bit more fluidity on the ball Lo Celso should probably be on the pitch too. With the 5 sub rule, we could easily start the game with:

Sissoko Ndombele
Bergwijn _____________ Sessegnon
Lo Celso Kane
and finish the game with:

Sissoko Winks
Lucas ___________________ Dele
Lamela Son​

or something to this effect.

Our counter attacking, especially Bergwijn‘s pace, had them scared so I cannot fathom why Sessegnon wasn’t introduced.

Massive finger pointing at the manager for me.
 

Ionman34

SC Supporter
Jun 1, 2011
7,182
16,793
I love a great defencing unit, pace, aggression, reading the game, being good on the ball, fantastic. Everyone sitting deep and conceding possession isn’t isn’t really building from the the back. That’s giving the defence a easy ride protecting them so much and getting them to only defender a limited area. Teach them how to defend 20 yards up the pitch or look to bring better in. You can defend or learn how to defend as a team Higher up the pitch. Dropping into your own penalty box and just booting the boy clear is not a good building block in my humble opinion.
That's what you build towards. He can't just wave a magic wand and have them playing that way in the limited time he's had.
So many on here saying he's had half a season to do this, but when? Before Covid he had games coming thick and fast, no time to work with the players. Then Covid hit and no one was allowed on the training pitches to train, they just had to maintain their fitness as best they could at home.

Now he's had what, a week or 2 to work with them? Even in that short period of time we can see that he's beginning to implement cohesion, even Keane commented on how organised we looked. We weren't able to maintain that and dropped deeper, whether that was due to fatigue or instruction I don't know, neither does anyone else. It didn't help that both Kane and Son were effectively passengers and, if any criticism is to be levelled at Mourinho, it should be for not hooking one or both of them to gain 2 extra fresh bodies.

Regardless, I can see what he is trying to do, get that solidity and cohesion in our defensive work, THAT is the foundation you build a team on. It takes time and it's never pretty, but he's building for the long game.
 

Japhet

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2010
19,303
57,734
That's what you build towards. He can't just wave a magic wand and have them playing that way in the limited time he's had.
So many on here saying he's had half a season to do this, but when? Before Covid he had games coming thick and fast, no time to work with the players. Then Covid hit and no one was allowed on the training pitches to train, they just had to maintain their fitness as best they could at home.

Now he's had what, a week or 2 to work with them? Even in that short period of time we can see that he's beginning to implement cohesion, even Keane commented on how organised we looked. We weren't able to maintain that and dropped deeper, whether that was due to fatigue or instruction I don't know, neither does anyone else. It didn't help that both Kane and Son were effectively passengers and, if any criticism is to be levelled at Mourinho, it should be for not hooking one or both of them to gain 2 extra fresh bodies.

Regardless, I can see what he is trying to do, get that solidity and cohesion in our defensive work, THAT is the foundation you build a team on. It takes time and it's never pretty, but he's building for the long game.

It would be rather odd if the team went in at halftime with pretty good energy, then came out 2nd half and were immediately fatigued and then somehow regained their energy once Utd had equalized. Seems pretty obvious to me it was an instruction.
 

Ionman34

SC Supporter
Jun 1, 2011
7,182
16,793
It would be rather odd if the team went in at halftime with pretty good energy, then came out 2nd half and were immediately fatigued and then somehow regained their energy once Utd had equalized. Seems pretty obvious to me it was an instruction.
We've seen exactly that under Poch, great one half, poor the next. We've even seen them out there in the 1st half looking like strangers then looking like World beaters in the 2nd half.

Were these instructions too?

I don't know where the issues lie, neither do you. The difference is I'm not jumping to conclusions.

All I do know is that I'm seeing small but noticeable fruits of the limited time he's had with the squad, where it appears he has them beginning to work cohesively as a defensive unit. I don't expect us to completely shut out an opposition so they create zero chances, so Lloris making saves I expect. He's also part of the defensive unit, so they pretty much got the job done. Having a penalty, that I vehemently maintain wasn't, awarded against us spoiled the hard work that was put in, but that wasn't even a chance created. The 2 main chances they created both came in the 1st half so, despite us dropping off, they really created nothing of note in the 2nd half.

Tuesday will tell us more about whether the cohesion is setting in, as 1 game isn't anywhere near a true barometer, but I'm hopeful.

At the end of the day I desperately want him to succeed, because his success is our success, but I don't expect it overnight, unlike some. Nor do I expect our Football to be particularly pretty whilst he goes about building the team effectively from the ground up. But once he's got that solidity in place, I do expect to see us get better going forward, as he'll have built the foundation for it.
 

parj

NDombelly ate all the pies
Jul 27, 2003
3,698
6,049
Do you mean winning the odd cup or winning things consistently? I’m not sure playing attractive football and being consistent contenders are mutually exclusive
Do you honestly think playing with the current tactics will win us anything? We can't beat mid table teams now.

Playing positive football, JM got us the second in-form team. It was working.

Playing negative we have gone backwards.
 

Blueluigi6

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2019
197
1,002
Do you honestly think playing with the current tactics will win us anything? We can't beat mid table teams now.

Are Manchester United a mid table team? I feel like people were always on Poch about not changing tactics based on who the opposition were, but when Mourinho plays defensively against a united team that were on a roll pre-covid, there are complaints?
 

kendoddsdadsdogsdead

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2011
2,217
3,757
That's what you build towards. He can't just wave a magic wand and have them playing that way in the limited time he's had.
So many on here saying he's had half a season to do this, but when? Before Covid he had games coming thick and fast, no time to work with the players. Then Covid hit and no one was allowed on the training pitches to train, they just had to maintain their fitness as best they could at home.

Now he's had what, a week or 2 to work with them? Even in that short period of time we can see that he's beginning to implement cohesion, even Keane commented on how organised we looked. We weren't able to maintain that and dropped deeper, whether that was due to fatigue or instruction I don't know, neither does anyone else. It didn't help that both Kane and Son were effectively passengers and, if any criticism is to be levelled at Mourinho, it should be for not hooking one or both of them to gain 2 extra fresh bodies.

Regardless, I can see what he is trying to do, get that solidity and cohesion in our defensive work, THAT is the foundation you build a team on. It takes time and it's never pretty, but he's building for the long game.
I get what your saying in principle but the issue is, is he building towards being more proactive or is that just how he wants to play especially against the better teams. It’s completely different as a defender playing in a low block with a lot of protection than playing higher up the pitch. If that’s the way he wants to play eventually should we be working on defending higher up the pitch as a unit because it’s a completely different way of defending.

I normally don’t like comparing other teams especially Liverpool and klopp but when he first came they were shipping a lot of goals, more than us probably but he didn’t just get everyone behind the ball ceding possession. He got them defending from the front as a unit higher up the pitch, they wanted more of the ball so their better players could do damage and eventually added a couple of defensive signings but their way of playing/defending hasn’t changed.

I just think this is how he wants us to play against the better sides in the league and if people are happy with that fine, but Im not going to try and convince myself he’s building into doing something else in these types of games.
 

buckley

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2012
2,595
6,073
I remember the early years ( not months ) of Ferguson and he was one match away from being sacked .
I remember the year Everton won the league for about 6 games in they were bottom of the league when Howard Kendall was manager .
The game is littered with people that were poor at the start of their reign only to go onto be very successful .
Our own Burkenshaw some would say was lucky not to get the tin tack .
For goodness sake chill out and give the man at least a chance to succeed ; surely the time to judge is at the end of next season when he has had the chance to put his own stamp on the squad all be it with mostly players out of contract .
He is not the manager of my choice but to go against him is to go against spurs as a club and my feelings is he will have my backing unless he becomes untenable due to results after a long series of bad results with no signs of improvement .
By the way for myself in the United game there were some positive signs with the defence and teams that are good are almost always built on a solid defence . Unfortunately we do not have a natural defensive midfielder if we had one I believe we dont concede that United goal.
 

kaz Hirai

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2008
17,692
25,340
I remember the early years ( not months ) of Ferguson and he was one match away from being sacked .
I remember the year Everton won the league for about 6 games in they were bottom of the league when Howard Kendall was manager .
The game is littered with people that were poor at the start of their reign only to go onto be very successful .
Our own Burkenshaw some would say was lucky not to get the tin tack .
For goodness sake chill out and give the man at least a chance to succeed ; surely the time to judge is at the end of next season when he has had the chance to put his own stamp on the squad all be it with mostly players out of contract .
He is not the manager of my choice but to go against him is to go against spurs as a club and my feelings is he will have my backing unless he becomes untenable due to results after a long series of bad results with no signs of improvement .
By the way for myself in the United game there were some positive signs with the defence and teams that are good are almost always built on a solid defence . Unfortunately we do not have a natural defensive midfielder if we had one I believe we dont concede that United goal.

Every time a manager has a bad start that old Alex Ferguson tale comes up .

That happened in the 20th century, in a different Division, with less completion and less pressure.
Soon be half a century ago

Is there no better modern take than that old testament stone engraving

I guess the disagrees mean there aren't any
 
Last edited:

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,483
38,600
Every time a manager has a bad start that old Alex Ferguson tale comes up .

That happened in the 20th century, in a different Division, with less completion and less pressure.
Soon be half a century ago

Is there no better modern take than that old testament stone engraving
Here's an up to date take on it then. If anyone thinks that Levy is anywhere near the stage of sacking Jose so that we can get this mythical 'Spurs' way back then they are deluded.
 

kaz Hirai

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2008
17,692
25,340
Here's an up to date take on it then. If anyone thinks that Levy is anywhere near the stage of sacking Jose so that we can get this mythical 'Spurs' way back then they are deluded.

Lol That's not an up to date take on it at all, that's just your opinion :ROFLMAO:
 

Ionman34

SC Supporter
Jun 1, 2011
7,182
16,793
I get what your saying in principle but the issue is, is he building towards being more proactive or is that just how he wants to play especially against the better teams. It’s completely different as a defender playing in a low block with a lot of protection than playing higher up the pitch. If that’s the way he wants to play eventually should we be working on defending higher up the pitch as a unit because it’s a completely different way of defending.

I normally don’t like comparing other teams especially Liverpool and klopp but when he first came they were shipping a lot of goals, more than us probably but he didn’t just get everyone behind the ball ceding possession. He got them defending from the front as a unit higher up the pitch, they wanted more of the ball so their better players could do damage and eventually added a couple of defensive signings but their way of playing/defending hasn’t changed.

I just think this is how he wants us to play against the better sides in the league and if people are happy with that fine, but Im not going to try and convince myself he’s building into doing something else in these types of games.
I'm not asking you to convince yourself, and you do have a point regarding how Klopp initially set up, but Mourinho isn't Klopp and the team he has isn't the same, so comparisons of that sort aren't really fair.

Having said that, Klopp's returns in his first 3 seasons were pretty ordinary, with pool never really looking like they'd challenge.

All I'm really saying here is that it's taken him 5 seasons to get where he is now, and he's had to make his own adjustments as he's gone along. Initially he tried to implement the "gegenpress" that everyone was banging on about and his teams burned out with a third of a season still to go. He's made his mistakes too, but he's been given time to get it right. Many of our "supporters" can't even give our manager half a season to get things working, and he's inherited a lot more issues than Klopp ever did.

Mourinho's track record, with regard to the Football his teams play when he's got his mix and methods right, speaks for itself. Whilst he has been pragmatic regarding certain fixtures in the past, mostly his teams have dominated and scored bundles of goals. We all accept he's not going to get the same financial backing he's received in the past, so why is it so hard to allow him the time to work with what he's got to make the sum greater than the parts? Christ, it took Poch night on 3 seasons to do that himself.
 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
22,339
80,478
Our counter attacking, especially Bergwijn‘s pace, had them scared so I cannot fathom why Sessegnon wasn’t introduced.

Massive finger pointing at the manager for me.
Sess is a very different player to Bergwijn though. He's not a rapid winger who can play high and keep defenders on their toes.

He's better at arriving in the penalty area late and supporting attacks in the construction. In a game like Friday, you want him playing deeper.
 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
22,339
80,478
Let's be honest....

Having watched Spurs over the last year, what would have been the first thing you'd try to fix?

If it was me, it would have been the defence and the terrible mistakes we'd been making. Mistakes that had been happening very frequently in Poch's last year.

Start with that, build stability and grow confidence then work on helping players become more destructive in attack.
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,657
205,649
Every time a manager has a bad start that old Alex Ferguson tale comes up .

That happened in the 20th century, in a different Division, with less completion and less pressure.
Soon be half a century ago

Is there no better modern take than that old testament stone engraving
"The great fallacy is that the game is first and last about winning. It is nothing of the kind. The game is about glory, it is about doing things in style and with a flourish, about going out and beating the lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."

I guess we should throw that in the dustbin too :D
 

kaz Hirai

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2008
17,692
25,340
"The great fallacy is that the game is first and last about winning. It is nothing of the kind. The game is about glory, it is about doing things in style and with a flourish, about going out and beating the lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."

I guess we should throw that in the dustbin too :D

Why?
 

buckley

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2012
2,595
6,073
Kaz Hirai are you saying that you cannot learn anything from history and you are not willing to learn from things of the past ?
All I can say is that view is very short sighted and judging people in a knee jerk kind of way or disposing of everything that does not work straight away is crass and in my view stupid . There is a lot to learn from the past however old fashion it may seem and judging people before they have been given a fair chance is one thing that should be taken into account .
Anybody looking for instant success really needs to be supporting clubs that can almost guarantee that outcome namely the oil rich clubs with vast sums of money that enables them first pick of the worlds best clubs like Chelsea ( Abramovich ) the Arab oil rich who own Man City
Juventus PSG and now Everton and possibly Newcastle they can give you instant success with their wealth which gives them the ability to pay massive transfers and massive wages . Anybody supporting spurs who wants success instantly is in for a rude awakening .
Clubs like ours will have to learn to be patient unless of course someone like Amazon takes us over then we can join the instant success club
 
Top