We don’t need a striker, we have parrott who just needs minutes from the bench.
I personally didn't find it funny, but I'm confused as to why it meritted this response.Not fucking funny
Yeah but this is one of those catch 22 situations where if that's your take we may as well fold the academy. He's untested because we haven't played him and according to you we shouldn't play him because he's untested.We do need a striker or are you suggesting you know better than Mourinho? Parrott is a promising kid but he’s untested. Osimhen is also a young striker but he’s both already playing and scoring goals in the French top flight. We can’t rely on untested kids. 1) it’s unfair on them and 2) we’re not a lower to mid table side, we’ve got ambition and to achieve we need quality players whom are ready to step up when needed. I hope Parrott goes on to have a successful career with us but for now he’s not ready.
Yeah but this is one of those catch 22 situations where if that's your take we may as well fold the academy. He's untested because we haven't played him and according to you we shouldn't play him because he's untested.
It's like trying to get hired at a job where experience is a prerequisite, but how do you get experience if no one will hire you?
With this type of logic the only youth products we should play are ones we've sold with a buyback clause or ones we've loaned out. Except with loans then you get the "but it was only the Championship" type responses.