What's new

The Naming Rights Thread

Albertbarich

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2020
5,303
20,100

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,668
332,042
More I think about more unlikely it feels to me. They saw the backlash with the super league. They’d have to be idiots to realise this wouldn’t be controversial. In regard to £35m it does seem bit high, but there’s simply no other stadium to measure it against. No other stadium in the world will have PL + NFL massive boxing bouts and lady gaga concerts it’s a totally unique product.
Dunno mate. I'm not a fan of the Qatari's and their operating practices but this won't see anything like the size of protests the ESL did. In all honesty I think it will barely register. As for the proposed value.... With NFL, box office ppv boxing events and televised stadium concerts they'll be overall be hitting a far bigger audience than basically any other stadiums and that's not taking into account aligning their premium brand with what is arguably the number one state of the art stadium in the world.
 

Danfunkel

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
1,814
5,847
Now, Ive never been comfortable with how the countries these companies come from operate, and how they treat their people, however I also understand this is business and a figure like that is a phenomenal one, and not to be sniffed at.

Also, I bet you most of the people who would shout so loudly against a company like this having an association with Spurs, are also the same people right now kicking off in the Kounde thread, or the Romero thread that we never spend big enough and will never be one of the 'elite'.

Well, here's your solution, chaps.
 

Amo

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2013
15,803
31,493
Now, Ive never been comfortable with how the countries these companies come from operate, and how they treat their people, however I also understand this is business and a figure like that is a phenomenal one, and not to be sniffed at.

Also, I bet you most of the people who would shout so loudly against a company like this having an association with Spurs, are also the same people right now kicking off in the Kounde thread, or the Romero thread that we never spend big enough and will never be one of the 'elite'.

Well, here's your solution, chaps.

I love how people paint the choice as a zero-sum one between elite-level performance via association with states like Qatar and Sunday League obscurity sans any form of financial support.

So Qataris are now anti-semites? ?

The State of Qatar, which owns QA and uses it as a subsidised image laundering vehicle? Yes, they're anti-semites.

What do you think the £35m, if true, would be buying, precisely? It isn't awareness for the airline's generous frequent flyer program.
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,166
15,644
So Qataris are now anti-semites? ?
Yes, I would say the Qatari government is antisemitic.

Qatari Government Promotes Textbook Teaching that Jews Seek World Domination | Anti-Defamation League (adl.org)

"the book teaches that Zionism “has managed to convince most of the Jews in the world of two things: First, to set up a state for the Jews in Palestine. Second, Jewish control over the entire world until it is their dominion.”.... Judaism is an “invalid, perverted religion” and that the Torah teaches Jews to kill, steal, deceive, and engage in racial supremacy"

They're also incredibly bigoted and dangerous to LGBT people. They're meant to be a tourist destination, but we're not remotely safe there. My trans friends avoid even flights that use it as a layover, because if they were put through a body scanner they'd face years in prison or worse.

Did I forget to mention the enslavement and endangerment of immigrant workers?
 

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,668
332,042
Thing is most companies willing to part with the money we are talking about will have some shade that will upset some people.

Unless Greenpeace has a huge advertising fund we don't know about I think somewhere down the line we will have to accept some objection due to their practices.

I get from a moral standpoint this is an issue. From a financial pov I doubt we'd get better.
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,166
15,644
Thing is most companies willing to part with the money we are talking about will have some shade that will upset some people.

Unless Greenpeace has a huge advertising fund we don't know about I think somewhere down the line we will have to accept some objection due to their practices.

I get from a moral standpoint this is an issue. From a financial pov I doubt we'd get better.
There's moral objections and moral objections though, aren't there? I mean, Joe Lewis hardly made his cash through being whiter-than-white, but he's not an egregious antisemite and homophobe who's idea of a positive PR project is killing 6,500 migrant workers en route to hosting a World Cup. And to be honest I think the objections to the Arab states are even more pertinent given our proud history of being the Yids.
 

SandroClegane

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2012
3,717
13,842
i dont know if kramer on ftl has any previous itk record but anyway:
Apparently naming rights close with Qatar Airways which pissed off the chap who told me as he was involved in trying to broker the deal two years ago and levy pulled the plug then for some reason
Hopefully true as we need the extra 35m a season or whatever the figure is


pinch of salt needed her i think
Would directly contradict the info I've been given. Levy never pulled the plug, it was the company that pulled the plug after the pandemic started.
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,166
15,644
Would directly contradict the info I've been given. Levy never pulled the plug, it was the company that pulled the plug after the pandemic started.
Would make sense if they blamed that internally on Levy though, and if they were interested again now the pandemic is (touch wood) coming towards an end in richer countries. Especially as they obviously have the money to operate at a loss for a time in order to try and come out of the pandemic as an even bigger player in the market than they were a couple of years back.
 

whitesocks

The past means nothing. This is a message for life
Jan 16, 2014
4,652
5,738
Dunno mate. I'm not a fan of the Qatari's and their operating practices but this won't see anything like the size of protests the ESL did. In all honesty I think it will barely register. As for the proposed value.... With NFL, box office ppv boxing events and televised stadium concerts they'll be overall be hitting a far bigger audience than basically any other stadiums and that's not taking into account aligning their premium brand with what is arguably the number one state of the art stadium in the world.
Surely for these NFL games, any sponsorship will be covered up. Without knowing who the main NFL partners are, I'd guess airlines feature heavily, and they would not want QA sneaking in through the back door.
I may have written similar on the British airways rumour, Or argued the opposite. That's the way I roll.
 
Aug 9, 2008
4,911
8,416
Dunno mate. I'm not a fan of the Qatari's and their operating practices but this won't see anything like the size of protests the ESL did. In all honesty I think it will barely register. As for the proposed value.... With NFL, box office ppv boxing events and televised stadium concerts they'll be overall be hitting a far bigger audience than basically any other stadiums and that's not taking into account aligning their premium brand with what is arguably the number one state of the art stadium in the world.

I concur 100% with the highlighted text, i would personally hope we dont go down the Qatari lead route
 

LeSoupeKitchen

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2011
3,114
7,643
Would directly contradict the info I've been given. Levy never pulled the plug, it was the company that pulled the plug after the pandemic started.

I thought they might be interested when I flew with them a couple of years ago and they had the spurs documentary on the entertainment system and nothing much else football wise.
 

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,502
38,621
Yes, I would say the Qatari government is antisemitic.

Qatari Government Promotes Textbook Teaching that Jews Seek World Domination | Anti-Defamation League (adl.org)

"the book teaches that Zionism “has managed to convince most of the Jews in the world of two things: First, to set up a state for the Jews in Palestine. Second, Jewish control over the entire world until it is their dominion.”.... Judaism is an “invalid, perverted religion” and that the Torah teaches Jews to kill, steal, deceive, and engage in racial supremacy"

They're also incredibly bigoted and dangerous to LGBT people. They're meant to be a tourist destination, but we're not remotely safe there. My trans friends avoid even flights that use it as a layover, because if they were put through a body scanner they'd face years in prison or worse.

Did I forget to mention the enslavement and endangerment of immigrant workers?
Same in Saudi Arabia.
 

SandroClegane

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2012
3,717
13,842
Would make sense if they blamed that internally on Levy though, and if they were interested again now the pandemic is (touch wood) coming towards an end in richer countries. Especially as they obviously have the money to operate at a loss for a time in order to try and come out of the pandemic as an even bigger player in the market than they were a couple of years back.
I also don't believe it was Qatar Airlines.

Edit: The club also employed multiple agencies to get this deal done so there's a chance the source here was a previous agency, and my source was in the most recent one to be used.
 
Top