Don't really get what's so WTF about this? Referring to the last update (#49) from the Goat, in which transfer of somewhat higher profile is the fee not a sticky point? Oh, whatever, where's my cider.It was a nice bit of info, but isn't the transfer fee always the sticky point in a transfer?
It probably depends on someone leaving whether or not he's targeted, If an acceptable bid comes in for a player like say Paulinho, Lamela or whoever then the incoming funds would probably go towards Lallana. Attacking players will usually cost more & clubs will be reluctant to outlay a large fee for defenders.If Lovren's fee is difficult for us to pay how are we going to pay Lallana's?
It is almost double the speculated Lovren fee
Tell that to Moyes and Fellaini. It's an advantage for a new player to come to a club with a manager they already know, but let's not get mixed up here. Southampton were allowed a lot more space to attack other teams and play their football, but except for under Tim (when people thought we were there for the taking), when do teams ever really come and attack us at WHL and give us space? It's the same reason I don't want Lukaku, he is not the right striker to break down a parked bus, he'll come up against different styles of play to when he was at Everton or West Brom, and I think Mourinho's willingness to get rid shows he doesn't think he's capable of playing against packed defences. Not saying Lallana isn't either, but moving from Southampton to Tottenham would still mean a lot of adaptation, despite us having his old manager.
Would you feel satisfied if we bring Caulker and Hector Moreno and let Daws and Kaboul go?
Means nothing, could be moving in the UK.See Jasper on SO is saying Hugo's house is up for sale.
See Jasper on SO is saying Hugo's house is up for sale.
Would you feel satisfied if we bring Caulker and Hector Moreno and let Daws and Kaboul go?
I would be more worried if we had bought, or we're just about to finalise, a new keeper.See Jasper on SO is saying Hugo's house is up for sale.
He's already proved he'd be happy to stay and fight for his place when he turned down that move to QPR, and he was still in the frame for England at that time. We should keep him as one of the 4 CB's, to me its not about being a 'back-up player', all 4/5 CB's should have a chance of starting if they play well enough when given opportunity's.If Dawson is happy to play a bit part role in the team, and knows he is NOT first choice and will NOT be first choice anymore, and is happy to stay and play the ocassional game in the EL/FAC/LC then fine.
If not, we should cash in whilst we still have the chance.
See Jasper on SO is saying Hugo's house is up for sale.
Would you feel satisfied if we bring Caulker and Hector Moreno and let Daws and Kaboul go?
Maybe the club want to sell Dawson because this will be probably the last summer that we can get a good fee for him. Hes 31 now, the club will not want to keep him until 33-34+ and see him retire or get a smaller fee in the future.
Will the real slim shady please stand up?Is the 'slim' chance of Lallana 'slim' as in 'Slim just rode out of town'?
Got a link to the house? I'm thinking of movingSee Jasper on SO is saying Hugo's house is up for sale.