What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 14th August 2013

Status
Not open for further replies.

wee_spur

SC Supporter
Feb 18, 2005
550
435
Well Lennon was best buds with Livermore and Huddlestone, so maybe if we get Lamela he'll be off to Hull too :p Honestly, if I had the choice between keeping him and Townsend I'd probably opt for Townsend now

Townsend is made for taking pot shots.

Lennon is made for setting up Soldado with a million chances!!!!
 

Rob

The Boss
Admin
Jun 8, 2003
28,025
65,145
Whitestreak on Coys

Longwinded so I've put it in a spoiler

He had lunch yesterday in the Bahamas with Terry Venables and Joe Lewis best Friend

This is not from Lewis directly, but based on what I heard yesterday it may help to make real sense of what is currently happening from a financial perspective!

The "value" in a successful club is plain for all to see. The stakes keep getting higher. Joe Lewis (ENIC) is the longest standing owner of a PL club which belies all the chat that he is in this to make a fast buck, especially as he made more than £1b in 1 day on ERM. He has demonstrated that he is shrewd and does not need to make money out of Spurs to get his next meal!
Notwithstanding that.......He is professional businessman and wishes to make his assets sweat.

I think the advent of Abramovic and Man C made him realise that he could still compete spending a fraction of their total spend.
I think AVB demonstrated last year finishing 6 points behind them and scoring the same amount of goals, the art of the possible.
I also believe he had absolutely no regard for 'arry, as he probably did not trust 'arry one inch with money, and even if Daniel was buying the players he could not be sure if our 'arry was getting some kind of commission, or if he really needed the player in question, Suarez no.......... Neville yes? that is poppycocked up!

Lewis is not a young man therefore it probably does not hurt to look back in time a bit to understand his thought process today.

Historically
30+ years ago the old order of the "big 5" was in no particular ranking
Spurs Arsenal ManU Pool Everton, and it had been that way from the mid 50s if not before!

Success on the pitch over a prolonged period, no matter how achieved determined who the biggest clubs were and most if not all of them appeared to be on a level playing field.

I said "appeared" since for a long time the Moores family pumped considerably more money into Liverpool than most if not all of the competition...

Man u got Fergie after a period in the wilderness and then putting together a winning team built Organically under Edwards (father and son), and as success came they smashed transfer records in order to stay there Ferdinand, RVN, Veron, Rooney, Berbatov, RVP, all over £25m and sold Ronaldo for £80m
They became for a time the most valuable sports brand in the world and are still up there. worth C£2b

Arsenal, much as I hate to admit it have also generally gone about their business the right way. They are in their new stadium, and have a sustainable model as long as they continue to produce success on the pitch even moderately and are worth c£1b this figure could be higher but for some inexplicable reason Wenger wont spend....

Chelsea were always a small club historically really untill Abramovic came and spent a fortune and hey presto they are now a big club as with City and al Nayan.
By shrewd financial management Levy has taken us to the brink but not really got us over the line. This would normally be ok particularly if we had gone to the Olympic park stadium, which probably would have cost say £100m

Currently (with FFP coming in)
BUT we now have to take a mega punt on the new stadium. This is a £450m punt, in order to justify it as a success within a couple of years the Club must either be worth something in the billion pound range or a la Arsenal paid back most if not all of the investment and be throwing off sustainable cash flow in order to compete on a more level playing field. My father used to say that "business is the art of taking the risk out of gambling" (an MBA later I agree with him).

If we can follow that maxim then we can look at the effect of "leveraging" our current position, and postulate a theory that our squad now is younger, leaner than it has ever been before, and the gap on paper is such, that whereas Chelsea and City have had to spend £100s of millions to get them to the position where they are today and in both cases not an "organically stable" model ie if the Russian and Sheik naffed off, it would all come crumbling down, Chelsea like us don't have a stadium ....unlike us they have not identified one. City will still be the 2nd club in Manchester in terms of fanbase and achievement for the foreseeable future.

Surely Joe Lewis looks at this and thinks "how do I maximise my chances of a successful new stadium" ie how to make sure I dont pour £300-450m down a hole

The first and most important thing is, surely to deliver sustainable success on the pitch, this leads to much increased revenue, leading to quicker payback, and decreasing his risk and exposure long term. Man U & Arsenal are examples of this strategy working

Ok that seems like a good idea, the next question has to be "Daniel find out how much it is going to cost me to GUARANTEE on the pitch success on a Consistent basis?"

Do you think Daniel replied "with or without Bale?"More likely he sat down with Andre who they both trust and said Andre "what will it take money wise to challenge for the title? If we aim high we may make sure of CL qualification..

"lets look at it both ways With Bale say £100m, without him realistically say £150m.More importantly how do you replace him"

I honestly don't know what the real numbers are..... but I bet I'm probably pretty close (within 10%.)
He would also have told Daniel to make sure that he got the players he needed rather than losing out through excessive haggling!

With no 'arry and FFP coming in, the new stadium 2 years off, the all bar 2 of the TOP clubs with new managers, this is like the perfect storm...

I believe this type of conversation has taken place..... it explains our activity and the reasons behind it!

Whitestreak is on here and posted that here. Did he post it on COYS aswell or was it copied over there?
 

HappySpur

You Can't Unfry Things Jerri
Jan 7, 2012
7,666
19,601
Hi guys just signed up. Sorry for being probably stupid,but what does SO mean


So you will see a few of these references in here and the RO (Read Only). Others have already answered your prime question.

But we get ITK from a few sources.

SC - well that is us obviously

SO - Spurs Odyssey (run by a guy named Paul Smith. main ITK are Archibald, Roger Morgan and Jasper)

FTL - From the Lane. (they had many of the old ITK like Ben). Not sure who their main ones are right now

COYS - COYS. (they have many ITK and PoTL is the best known )

TFC - The Fighting Cock (they have an account like our Goat that is an anonymous but vetted ITK called the Cobra). The guy that runs that site pops by here occassionally and is very nice

ja606 - Just Another 606 (this is mainly a guy named lookslikemodric who posts here as well)

and finally

Twitter - we do not allow it here very often. But we have two ITK (Jjetset and ryantegan) that post there as well and their twitter posts will sometimes make it in here. And Gards44 is not a member here but is the only other ITK from twitter that we allow in here.

Oh and one more thing. Whores. Odd reference but it is used in the most loving way to refer to people who are on one than more site and come here to post ITK from those sites. Scutch is the longest standing whore. He's usually somebody to pay attention to. But there are a lot of them who make this all tick

Hope that helps.
 

N17TJK

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2013
207
922
Siggy is better than Eriksen, no deal

Pleased to see Hudd go, not going to bash him, wish him well, but his style of play just wasn't suited for us

No thanks to Osvaldo, major major attitude problems
why do so many disagree with that? three spot on points!
 

DorsetSpursguy

New Member
Aug 14, 2013
11
19
So you will see a few of these references in here and the RO (Read Only). Others have already answered your prime question.

But we get ITK from a few sources.

SC - well that is us obviously

SO - Spurs Odyssey (run by a guy named Paul Smith. main ITK are Archibald, Roger Morgan and Jasper)

FTL - From the Lane. (they had many of the old ITK like Ben). Not sure who their main ones are right now

COYS - COYS. (they have many ITK and PoTL is the best known )

TFC - The Fighting Cock (they have an account like our Goat that is an anonymous but vetted ITK called the Cobra). The guy that runs that site pops by here occassionally and is very nice

ja606 - Just Another 606 (this is mainly a guy named lookslikemodric who posts here as well)

and finally

Twitter - we do not allow it here very often. But we have two ITK (Jjetset and ryantegan) that post there as well and their twitter posts will sometimes make it in here. And Gards44 is not a member here but is the only other ITK from twitter that we allow in here.

Hope that helps.
Thanks very much. I'm still looking for RO
 

King Yid

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2011
275
610
Can't see them being that much. Hope he can prove himself and either come back or secure a move somewhere.
Not so sure. I heard, although cant recall where, that due to a clause in his contract he got a pay hike from that solitary England appearance. Supposedly on around £30-40k/week!!

Edit: obviously I've read several posts by Breezer since I posted. £30-40k now seems a bit sporty on my part!
 

Col_M

Pointing out the Obvious
Feb 28, 2012
22,786
45,888
Adebayor offer of Beskitas and another east European club. Expecting his departure after palace with a possible replacement. Defoe expected to stay but very possible he will be gone. Avb wanting lamela and/or willian.

If Carlsberg did Transfer Windows.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top