What's new

Spurs and VAR

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
9,263
11,306
I just don’t see how someone who is supposedly qualified sitting in a nice comfy chair can watch a video of an incident and still get decisions wrong.
Trouble is I don’t think any of the refs in this league would be strong enough to overturn one of their own decisions even if they were allowed to look at the screen themselves!
There have been so many incidents already this season that have been wrong, they can say ‘teething issues’ or whatever but ultimately whoever is sitting in Heathrow should be replaced after a poor decision.
Why are they in Heathrow anyway?
Why doesn’t the var official sit pitch side during a game?
I’d sooner have a couple of ex pro’s doing the var, at least they ‘get it’, I don’t think today’s players would get their decisions though.
To say it’s a complete mess is probably the understatement of the year!
 

Lighty64

I believe
Aug 24, 2010
10,400
12,476
The only clear and obvious error it failed to address yday was Son red card imo.

The only other error was Everton should have had a pen.

you don't think Son was fouled?

he made enough contact, and had he given it that the rest of the game would of changed, even if it meant we lost, a good chance Son's season wouldn't be damaged after the Gomes tackle
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
you don't think Son was fouled?

he made enough contact, and had he given it that the rest of the game would of changed, even if it meant we lost, a good chance Son's season wouldn't be damaged after the Gomes tackle

If Son had gone down on the initial contact he'd have got it but it was so obvious he had balance and then leapt from his right foot. They were right not to give pen.
 

Lighty64

I believe
Aug 24, 2010
10,400
12,476
If Son had gone down on the initial contact he'd have got it but it was so obvious he had balance and then leapt from his right foot. They were right not to give pen.

ok will agree to disagree
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
That Dele handball was the right call IMO

The clue that it wasn't clear and obvious was in the 3 minutes it took to analyse it. Nobody can say for absolute fact whether it touched mina first.
 

Yiddo100

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2019
9,918
52,111
The clue that it wasn't clear and obvious was in the 3 minutes it took to analyse it. Nobody can say for absolute fact whether it touched mina first.
I did think the Sanchez tackle on Richarlison was a penalty though
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
I did think the Sanchez tackle on Richarlison was a penalty though

I didn't I thought Richarlison trod on Sanchez, also Richarlison thankfully handed helped himself by spending half the time on the floor. Thought Sanchez dealt with him well but that moment was certainly hairy.
 

Yiddo100

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2019
9,918
52,111
I didn't I thought Richarlison trod on Sanchez, also Richarlison thankfully handed helped himself by spending half the time on the floor. Thought Sanchez dealt with him well but that moment was certainly hairy.
It’s one of those where anywhere else on the pitch and it’s a foul
 

glacierSpurs

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2013
16,163
25,473
Saw something about the video framerate being mentioned in Son's thread and it really is puzzling at this age of camera technology, they are still trying to freeze frame from 25 (or 50) fps footage and check. Especially the long decision on whether Dele handballed. There is no way that frame shows any accuracy when the visual of the ball is already motion-blurry and stretched.

If VAR is about precision of fairness, they must be similarly supported by high level of precision in the equipment. When iPhone 11 is capable of 240fps at full HD, there really shouldn't be any reason the cameras used for VAR to be anything less than 720fps.
 

muppetman

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2011
9,027
25,209
It’s one of those where anywhere else on the pitch and it’s a foul
As the guy was throwing himself to the ground every two minutes I'm pleased that it wasn't given. How the ref can continually just wave play on - surely at some point you either give a foul or a book the guy for simulation?
 

FITZ

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2004
2,020
1,527
If Son had gone down on the initial contact he'd have got it but it was so obvious he had balance and then leapt from his right foot. They were right not to give pen.

that’s not the rules though.

did the defender win the ball - no

he’s made contact and influenced the game. If he hadn’t dived in or wasn’t there. Son wouldn’t have fallen over.

So should have been a penalty regardless of Sons actions.
 

LeParisien

Wrong about everything
Mar 5, 2018
3,212
8,170
that’s not the rules though.

did the defender win the ball - no

he’s made contact and influenced the game. If he hadn’t dived in or wasn’t there. Son wouldn’t have fallen over.

So should have been a penalty regardless of Sons actions.
Yes but the tackle didn’t make him fall. So he hasn’t prevented son from doing anything. Son chose to fall to the ground.

i don’t believe diving should be encouraged - even if it’s my team.
 

muppetman

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2011
9,027
25,209
Yes but the tackle didn’t make him fall. So he hasn’t prevented son from doing anything. Son chose to fall to the ground.

i don’t believe diving should be encouraged - even if it’s my team.
So should Son have been given a yellow for simulation?
 
Top