- Feb 27, 2005
- 6,258
- 5,043
If Poch had come in as coach when he was 19, he'd be twice the player he is now.
no, if you look at my post history you will find i have always been a supporter of Livermore, when he was at the club.I wonder if the motivation for this thread is to generate as many obnoxious posts as possible about one of the success stories from our academy: a local boy with a moderate amount of talent who was enabled, as a result of his own determination and the quality of the instruction he obtained from our academy coaches, to turn himself into a decent Premiership-standard midfielder.
It's a bizarre choice of subject for a thread, because of course we should not re-sign Livermore. We've moved on. We're a much better side now and, even when we were one notch down the quality scale, he wasn't a regular, first-choice starter. It scarcely demands a moment's consideration.
So I'm highly suspicious of the original post. I suspect it's just an malicious excuse to troll up some gratuitous abuse for a good footballer.
Let's just pat the club on the back for producing yet another successful professional footballer whose achievements are at least a great as his talent.
If Poch had come in as coach when he was 19, he'd be twice the player he is now.
Why would we when we already have Dier and Wanyama who play in his position?
Don't think his liver can take it any more, mate.
I wonder if the motivation for this thread is to generate as many obnoxious posts as possible about one of the success stories from our academy: a local boy with a moderate amount of talent who was enabled, as a result of his own determination and the quality of the instruction he obtained from our academy coaches, to turn himself into a decent Premiership-standard midfielder.
It's a bizarre choice of subject for a thread, because of course we should not re-sign Livermore. We've moved on. We're a much better side now and, even when we were one notch down the quality scale, he wasn't a regular, first-choice starter. It scarcely demands a moment's consideration.
So I'm highly suspicious of the original post. I suspect it's just an malicious excuse to troll up some gratuitous abuse for a good footballer.
Let's just pat the club on the back for producing yet another successful professional footballer whose achievements are at least a great as his talent.
If you stop posting Daily Mail links, I'll think about it.Should we fuck.
You've slipped into an alternative reality stream where SC is a forum for those dabbling in crystal methWh...what's going on???
I like the guy and loved him in our shirt, but the negative comments are more an indication that we have moved on significantly as a club and it just seemed like a weird suggestion based on where we are and where we want to be!I don't see the need for all the condescending comments about Livermore
He was a youth product and life long supporter who loved the club
He always gave his all for the club
He wasn't shit and he isn't shit, he's just not as good as the excellent options we already have in his postion nor do we lack cover there
He's not someone we should sign at this time but I don't understand all the water boy comments mugging him off like he was shit like Gary Doherty