- Aug 21, 2013
- 319
- 898
He was speaking to a member of the back room staff and pointing to his arm when he walked off at half-time but he blew his chance, I would have changed the whole midfield at half-timeWas he injured
He was speaking to a member of the back room staff and pointing to his arm when he walked off at half-time but he blew his chance, I would have changed the whole midfield at half-timeWas he injured
It isn't about charity and more about the fact that there is one week in the window and we haven't even signed a CB or an attacker yet. In what world are we going to sell Lo Celso, find a suitable replacement within our budget and accommodate our other priority areas?Christ we are not a charity, how about he earns that chance. He doesn’t deserve anything. He has shown little in competitive time in the Premier League while with us.
Fine, don’t say he deserves it when he doesn’t, players should earn there place, it is not the school play ground where everyone gets a go. We are a professional football club and GLC among others has not remotely earned anything to deserve to play at all, other than utterly meaningless friendly games which tell us nothing, other than that in competitive games he goes complete missing often.It isn't about charity and more about the fact that there is one week in the window and we haven't even signed a CB or an attacker yet. In what world are we going to sell Lo Celso, find a suitable replacement within our budget and accommodate our other priority areas?
Whether you like it or not keeping him as a back-up to Maddison is the best bet we have for now.
End of the day up until now Ange, who has been working with him day in and day out, has spoken very positively of him. Maybe he’s changed his mind after 45 mins of football, it’s possible. If so then I would very much expect him to be put on the loan list tomorrow as I think that’s the only way he leaves. If he isn’t put on the list then Ange obviously still rates him and he will likely stay. At this point it’s down to Ange. Like you say getting any sort of replacement will be hard at this point but if Ange doesn’t rate him then I’d still expect him to go.It isn't about charity and more about the fact that there is one week in the window and we haven't even signed a CB or an attacker yet. In what world are we going to sell Lo Celso, find a suitable replacement within our budget and accommodate our other priority areas?
Whether you like it or not keeping him as a back-up to Maddison is the best bet we have for now.
Maddison was playing with Sarr, Son, Kulusevski, Davies and a Solomon that was in his favoured position (he really didn't play well on the right today). Lo Celso was playing with the shower of players underperforming that we saw in the first half. Consequently he had very few passing options when he was on the pitch. I'm not too sure what he's being slated for, when everyone else was also poor. At least he made an effort to break the lines and create something in the first half, which is more than most of our players.The difference when Maddison came on says it all. But if we can't replace him he's all we've got. lets hope Madders stays fit all season.
Then you’ve not seen many players play for SpursWorst player I have even seen play for the football club….
No I got laughed at cos I said he was shit…2 good preseason performances mean nothing. He can’t pass, he can’t run, he can’t to a lot that I expect a £40m footballer to doLol the feelings of him on here changed pretty sharpish after tonight’s game.
Only those in last 42 yearsThen you’ve not seen many players play for Spurs
Maddison was playing with Sarr, Son, Kulusevski, Davies and a Solomon that was in his favoured position (he really didn't play well on the right today). Lo Celso was one of a shower of players underperforming that we saw in the first half. Consequently he had very few passing options when he was on the pitch. I'm not too sure what he's being slated for, when everyone else was also poor. At least he made an effort to break the lines and create something in the first half, which is more than most of our players.Maddison was playing with Sarr, Son, Kulusevski, Davies and a Solomon that was in his favoured position (he really didn't play well on the right today). Lo Celso was playing with the shower of players underperforming that we saw in the first half. Consequently he had very few passing options when he was on the pitch. I'm not too sure what he's being slated for, when everyone else was also poor. At least he made an effort to break the lines and create something in the first half, which is more than most of our players.
If Richy had found him when he found space on the edge of the box, he'd likely have scored from there.
He's a pass and move player but there wasn't enough movement in the first half and too few players found space.
Where he is short of Maddison is that Maddison is far better at dribbling and turning out of pressure to find space, but if lo Celso is playing with a team of players all buzzing around moving looking for one touch passes and quick give and goes, he's excellent. We just weren't that team when he was on the pitch.
Only those in last 42 years
By the fact I said also poor, I'm not sure it needed fixing.Maddison was playing with Sarr, Son, Kulusevski, Davies and a Solomon that was in his favoured position (he really didn't play well on the right today). Lo Celso was one of a shower of players underperforming that we saw in the first half. Consequently he had very few passing options when he was on the pitch. I'm not too sure what he's being slated for, when everyone else was also poor. At least he made an effort to break the lines and create something in the first half, which is more than most of our players.
There fixed it for you, he was as bad as any of them.