- Jun 4, 2004
- 459
- 1,358
But if its a loan, will he get recalled as and when Betis like?
But if its a loan, will he get recalled as and when Betis like?
Well, kiddo, it’s a loan with obligation to buy so we will sign him on a perm next season but for now we pay a smallish fee (so in theory we have more money) and gets around PSG’s sell-on clause.can someone explain in 16 year old terms my tiny brain can't comprehend it
They’re saying it’s a fixed loan, so he can’t be recalled.But if its a loan, will he get recalled as and when Betis like?
can someone explain in 16 year old terms my tiny brain can't comprehend it
We’re loaning him for a year before purchasing next summer. Means Betis owe PSG less money (the sell on doesn’t take into account the loan fee), and potentially frees us up some money this summer for further business...can someone explain in 16 year old terms my tiny brain can't comprehend it
We’re loaning him for a year before purchasing next summer. Means Betis owe PSG less money (the sell on doesn’t take into account the loan fee), and potentially frees us up some money this summer for further business...
No, it’s loan with obligation to buy.But if its a loan, will he get recalled as and when Betis like?
I don’t think this is as much about freeing up cash. It’s about getting Betis what they need out of the deal we have been offering based on what we have been willing to spend, which was always substantial.Total genius from Levy if this frees up cash for Dybala
I don’t think this is about freeing up cash. It’s about getting Betis what they need out of the deal we have been offering based on what we have been willing to spend, which was always substantial.
I don’t think this is about freeing up cash. It’s about getting Betis what they need out of the deal we have been offering based on what we have been willing to spend, which was always substantial.
Perhaps, but there is one point that doesn’t make sense to me though. Wouldn’t this require Betis to resign Lo Celso so that he can get the wages that we agreed to with him in his personal terms since he is still their property? Just trying to figure out how he gets the wages we agreed to unless this was always part of it.hopefully does both. enables the GLC deal to happen, and pushes the majority of the fee in to next summer's budget (if that was going to exist!).
But if its a loan, will he get recalled as and when Betis like?
Perhaps, but there is one point that doesn’t make sense to me though. Wouldn’t this require Betis to resign Lo Celso so that he can get the wages that we agreed to with him in his personal terms since he is still their property? Just trying to figure out how he gets the wages we agreed to unless this was always part of it.
Only if he scores the winning goal in the CL final.
Don't worry about it. Foreign clubs do these deals all the time. It is effectively just finance spreading to get around clauses and shift money around different financial periods (usually for FFP).Perhaps, but there is one point that doesn’t make sense to me though. Wouldn’t this require Betis to resign Lo Celso so that he can get the wages that we agreed to with him in his personal terms since he is still their property? Just trying to figure out how he gets the wages we agreed to unless this was always part of it.
Ok, I didn’t realize we can do that.I assume as part of the loan contract? we take over responsibility for his salary and can pay him an agreed sum.
Perhaps, but there is one point that doesn’t make sense to me though. Wouldn’t this require Betis to resign Lo Celso so that he can get the wages that we agreed to with him in his personal terms since he is still their property? Just trying to figure out how he gets the wages we agreed to unless this was always part of it.