What's new

Player Watch: Erik Lamela

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pauline-Ho

Active Member
Aug 15, 2013
238
302
Lamela and Willian?

Hate to say it but if it's true I can't see Bale staying. On the incredibly slim chance that he does...

Willian - Bale - Lamela


Jesus Christ.


Could you imagine.....

holy crap.gif
 

2DogsBarker

All in, as always
Aug 23, 2011
75
223
lamela has signed a new contract with Roma following the sale of Osvaldo to Southampton. sorry to say he isn't coming to the Lane anytime soon :(
 

Danners9

Available on a Free Transfer
Mar 30, 2004
14,018
20,805
Please help me, who is this guy?

Roberto Renga@RobertoRenga
42m

#Lamela ha un contratto regolarmente accettato e firmato con #AsRoma, che può dunque tenerlo. Se lo cede è per scelta, non per obbligo.

writer and filmmaker it seems, he is producing a film on Totti.

it says he has accepted and signed a contract with Roma. However, it isn't clear (to me) if he means the existing contract - ie, he has a contract with Roma that he signed and any sale would be by choice rather than obligation - or if it means he has signed a new one.
 

tom4s

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2010
684
1,214
Please help me, who is this guy?

Roberto Renga@RobertoRenga
42m
#Lamela ha un contratto regolarmente accettato e firmato con #AsRoma, che può dunque tenerlo. Se lo cede è per scelta, non per obbligo.

I read that tweet, which google translates into:
# Lamela has duly accepted and signed a contract with # AsRoma, which can then keep it. If the yield is by choice, not out of obligation.

I think he is simply saying that Lamela is under contract with Roma, and if they choose to sell him they do so because they want to, not because they are forced to.
 

Festrup

Member
Jan 6, 2013
40
112
So you just typed Lamela into the search function of twitter and copied and pasted a random tweet? Well done (y)
No, it was a retweet from Steve Cresswell who tweets a lot about spurs. And when i tried to translate it, it didn't make much sense to me. I posted it in here because i thought it could be of mutual interest.
 

$hoguN

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2005
26,662
34,802
It would appear so but I still believe there is concrete interest in the likes of Townsend, Siggy, Defoe and Ade so i'm certainly not discounting the possibility of more player upheaval - certainly if there are legitimate deals to be done with superior players.

You may well be right. In my opinion we are looking to decrease the squad size, so if we can get Lamela and Willian (by some miracle) I think we will let Siggy, Townsend and one of Ade/Defoe go without adding anyone else in an attacking sense.
 

felmani26

SC Supporter
Jan 1, 2008
24,552
43,454
Come on, are we really that sad we need to actually watch the flight path of Sabatini's plane to the UK?!

:cautious: *clicks on link*
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,343
63,077
You may well be right. In my opinion we are looking to decrease the squad size, so if we can get Lamela and Willian (by some miracle) I think we will let Siggy, Townsend and one of Ade/Defoe go without adding anyone else in an attacking sense.
We are prob also looking to sell Falqué. Townsend and Sig should raise a substantial fee together. If we sell Ade I would imagin that money would go strate into another striker. Lamela and Will could, maybe be possible but I am not even going to think about it. And to think, we would still have Holtby as a rotation option when he is fit again! What a potentially increadible team!

I am a little worried about Arss tho, if earlier reports that Roma where offering him to both London clubs are true then I can completely see Arss going for him out of desperation and to appease the fans. They don't need him in the slightest but still, they are idiots when it comes to transfer these days.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top