- Feb 22, 2010
- 30,039
- 29,629
I would, its wrong and the stadium should be an athletics only stadium, Its why I didn't want itWould people here sign the petition if we were in west ham's position or would Levy be hailed as a genius for such a deal?
I would, its wrong and the stadium should be an athletics only stadium, Its why I didn't want itWould people here sign the petition if we were in west ham's position or would Levy be hailed as a genius for such a deal?
Obviously YOU would....
I would, its wrong and the stadium should be an athletics only stadium, Its why I didn't want it
Would people here sign the petition if we were in west ham's position or would Levy be hailed as a genius for such a deal?
So you would sign the petition?
I wouldn't, because petitions are useless.
Clearly they're not. Do you think Duncan-Smith wanted to release the figures on the number of deaths of disabled people told they were fit for work by his department? Or that Cameron wanted to allow refugees into this country?
This is where we differ because I definitely would, I'm not saying I would find it easy but I would do it.No, but i don't expect west ham fans to sign the petition either.
If one of my family murdered 20 people, it would be wrong. Doesn't mean i'd give evidence against them.
This is where we differ because I definitely would, I'm not saying I would find it easy but I would do it.
If your evidence was crucial, the difference between them going free or going in jail, you still wouldn't do it?
You'd let the person be free on the streets to murder again?
Ok now I have a better understanding of why you will not criticise Levy.I'd do everything i could to make sure that they never did it again. But i wouldn't give evidence against them.
Ok now I have a better understanding of why you will not criticise Levy.
You think they did that because of Petitions? seriously?!
listening to SSN and Boris being questioned this Olympic Stadium will make Wet Spam very rich, very quick, and that irritating reporter Kaveh Solhekol saying he has been in touch with Wet Spam and they are saying that over a time they will be giving back 100's of millions back to the tax payer? HOW by paying 2.5m a season? by sounds of it, they will only be paying their playing/backroom staff.
an absolute joke, and wrecked my hopes of 1 day they would go out of business, HATE the TEAM and the owners and C*** Fans
Well it depends, the Olympic Legacy Spokes person said WHam do not get any money from stadium sponsorship, concerts, non-match day sponsorship or corporate hospitality, they basically only get the stadium for use on match days only. If that is the case, and we will find out if that is true now, then it won't make West Ham very rich very quickly. Its the ability to utilise the full commercial benefits of a large stadium that makes it a money spinner - Newcastle have a stadium of the capacity West Ham will have at the Olympic stadium give or take a few thousand, but Newcastle aren't a rich club. You've got to be able to design the stadium to maximise your brand and your commercial revenues.
Well it depends, the Olympic Legacy Spokes person said WHam do not get any money from stadium sponsorship, concerts, non-match day sponsorship or corporate hospitality, they basically only get the stadium for use on match days only. If that is the case, and we will find out if that is true now, then it won't make West Ham very rich very quickly. Its the ability to utilise the full commercial benefits of a large stadium that makes it a money spinner - Newcastle have a stadium of the capacity West Ham will have at the Olympic stadium give or take a few thousand, but Newcastle aren't a rich club. You've got to be able to design the stadium to maximise your brand and your commercial revenues.
Does that mean that is the stadium is sponsored then the naming rights goes to the government? That is normally a money spinner so the tax payer would at least benefit from that. I haven't heard about any potential naming rights deal though, has anyone else?