- Aug 10, 2017
- 5,222
- 12,353
I think he means won nothing of note AND done nothing of note. And I’d have to agree with him.
Such a nothing argument, though. Who cares what he's won and what he hasn't won; when has it served us well before?
I think he means won nothing of note AND done nothing of note. And I’d have to agree with him.
i dont know who youre talking about. not saying there isn't a player he's rubbed the wrong way, but I am Australian and when he was manager he was described as 'loved by his players'. He works them hard but he's also very fair. and Celtic's players have regularly spoken about the effect he's had on them on and off the pitch since he's been there.Literally in documentaries you have Australian players saying how they never know what he's thinking, he is just always watching. You would never sit down and have a cup of coffee with him, its all business.
The same could be said for those who think people would be a smash hit before they’re even through the door.What is with this obsession of writing people off before they have even joined the club?
Then the proof will be in the pudding won’t it.Such a nothing argument, though. Who cares what he's won and what he hasn't won; when has it served us well before?
The difference between Ange and Slot for me is whilst you can't judge either on their league form, you can judge them against better opposition in Europe. Ange record in Europe looks poor (Let's forget about CL) he was conceding goals for fun whilst Slot at least gave it a go against the bigger teams and got to respectable stages of the tournament, only to lose to Jose twice.
Ange got done comfortably by Bodo/Glimt. It wasn't even a contest
'Distant' because Australia is the other side of the world.that last bit is literally not true at all. He's been described as tough but fair and his players love him. Also, distant is a weird description. Look at how he's embraced Celtic and how they've embraced him. He fully buys into wherever he is. He's very similar as a character to Pochettino imo
It’s not ignorance though it’s being realistic with where he’s at in his career and I don’t think that’s with a club of our stature. I respect your opinion though.Look I'm not keen on him for a number of reasons but I find it ignorant just dismissing the relative achievements in his career. The fact he is being linked to premier league jobs as an Australian who has worked his way up the chain from his native country, building teams up to become league champions, is nothing to be sniffed at.
No. It will be in the eating of said pudding.Then the proof will be in the pudding won’t it.
It's started
QuiteNo. It will be in the eating of said pudding.
It's started
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZGJxkb118/?t=1How does Ange's team set up defensively. Do they play a high line?
Also, does he make tactical tweaks in-game? Or is he just pretty flat out attack?
I watched the Madrid highlights and they had a right go but got caught out on counter
That league had a club in the UEFA Cup final last year, and has had van Dijk, Wanyama and Tierney develop there before becoming top PL players.Then I guess I'm Mick from Basildon. I just think we should aim higher than someone managing in that league, if that makes me look Moronic then so be it.
The difference between Ange and Slot for me is whilst you can't judge either on their league form, you can judge them against better opposition in Europe. Ange record in Europe looks poor (Let's forget about CL) he was conceding goals for fun whilst Slot at least gave it a go against the bigger teams and got to respectable stages of the tournament, only to lose to Jose twice.
Ange got done comfortably by Bodo/Glimt. It wasn't even a contest
Yes it could be. But at least give the person a chance either way, no?The same could be said for those who think people would be a smash hit before they’re even through the door.
It's started