What's new

Mihir Bose: Struggling Spurs still attract financial interest

Hoowl

Dr wHo(owl)
Staff
Aug 18, 2005
6,527
267
Struggling Spurs still attract financial interest

They may be bottom of the Premier League and enduring their worst start to a season for 53 years, but two bids are being prepared to buy Tottenham Hotspur. One potential bidder is a British consortium, while another is a Singapore-based Asian billionaire.

This possible Asian bid involves the Israeli super-agent Pini Zahavi, who was responsible for bringing Roman Abramovich to Chelsea back in 2003. Abramovich had looked at Spurs, but was put off by the prospect of having to pay £150m and never made an offer. Tottenham, a quoted company currently valued at round £350m, have consistently said they are not looking to sell. It would be up to the chairman Daniel Levy and the board to judge what is a fair value for the club with £400m believed to be a fair price. If such an offer was made, and it was felt to be genuine, then Levy and the board would be duty bound to inform their shareholders.

Although Spurs have a lot of shareholders, most have very small stakes and are generally fans. The club is effectively owned by Enic, a private sports and media company which holds 82% of the club. Joe Lewis, the overseas-based British businessman owns 80% of Enic with Levy owning most of the rest of the company. Lewis lost nearly £400m after the collapse of American investment bank Bear Stearns.

Despite Tottenham's parlous on-field position, the club is considered an extremely attractive buy - mainly because Levy has run a successful business. The club are about to announce very good set of results for the year ending in June. This could see profits climb to about £30m and turnover rise to £115m, with the increases due to Spurs' Carling Cup victory and higher income from the new Sky-Setanta Premier League television deal. In addition, plans are well advanced for a new, redeveloped stadium at White Hart Lane. But all this will mean little to fans as they look at the league table and wonder when the players might win their first league game. The club are keen to dismiss any talk of manager Juande Ramos having another four games to stop the rot. The prospect of changing coach barely 12 months after he arrived is considered too awful to contemplate. The view is the slump will have to be sorted out by the football side. However, the fact remains Levy's financial success is not matched by his ability to find an effective football management team, always one of the most important requirements for any successful club.

Glenn Hoddle, Levy's first appointment, lasted nearly two-and-a-half years. When he was sacked in September 2003, Spurs spent the rest of the season under the caretaker management of then football director David Pleat. Levy looked at getting the Italian Giovanni Trappatoni, with one suggestion being that Mark Hughes should work with him. Having suggested he might come to White Hart Lane, Trappatoni subsequently changed his mind, saying his wife did not fancy London. In the summer of 2004, Levy, with much fanfare, announced the arrival of Jacques Santini as coach and Frank Arnesen as football director. The club hailed Santini as "Jacques the Lad" describing it as "one of the biggest coups in Premiership history". He was gone five months and two days later.

Arnesen was billed as "the Great Dane" and the official magazine talked of the club's "fresh new continental approach towards footballing matters". He was gone by the end of the season. So far Martin Jol, Santini's number two, has been the longest-serving manager under Levy, but even he did not complete three years. Through all this turmoil, Levy appears to have learnt two lessons: one, avoid buying players over 28; and two, never allow a player's contract to go into his final year. When Levy took over, the big question was whether Spurs could keep Sol Campbell. He was in his last year and ended up leaving on a free transfer to Arsenal. Levy was determined never to be trapped like that again. This explains why Michael Carrick and Jermain Defoe were both sold, at a financial profit but with the price now being paid on the field. In Hoddle's first year players well over the age of 30 like Gus Poyet and Teddy Sheringham were bought. They nearly produced the League Cup, and on the way to the final Tottenham beat Chelsea 5-1, but it proved another nearly moment for Spurs. Levy's deal-making skills may be legendary, and feared by the rest of the Premier League, but failure to translate this on the field of play means Tottenham may be condemned to remain a club where the playing record does not match the financial results.
 

DC_Boy

New Member
May 20, 2005
17,608
5
of course we still attract interest - the club is worth a lot of money

even if we got relegated we'd attract interest

in fact one good spin off from relegation might be that Levy might sell up cheaper to a billionaire benefactor ... then again ....

incidentally note that the article fails to mention we won the Carling Cup last year and over the past 3 years have been the fifth best club in the country

but why present a fair picture
 

MattyP

Advises to have a beer & sleep with prostitutes
May 14, 2007
14,041
2,980
To be fair to Mihir Bose, he is one of the journo's who researches things quite intensely, has written books on Spurs in the past and is not as bad as some of the ones out there.
 

DC_Boy

New Member
May 20, 2005
17,608
5
To be fair to Mihir Bose, he is one of the journo's who researches things quite intensely, has written books on Spurs in the past and is not as bad as some of the ones out there.

and he still painted an anti-Spurs picture

mentioning when we didn't win the lge cup not when we did and forgetting to mention our 2 top five finishes

you can't go round slating Levy's on the pitch record and forget he's given us our three best years in the prem - or you can but it's hardly fair reporting
 

MattyP

Advises to have a beer & sleep with prostitutes
May 14, 2007
14,041
2,980
and he still painted an anti-Spurs picture

mentioning when we didn't win the lge cup not when we did and forgetting to mention our 2 top five finishes

you can't go round slating Levy's on the pitch record and forget he's given us our three best years in the prem - or you can but it's hardly fair reporting

Not disagreeing with you, but unusually felt compelled to defend him as he is normally pretty alright in his reporting.

Guess even at the BBC standards have dropped and he'd rather report on the negative side to make sure he gets his required number of hits on his blog to justify his new position, rather than report in the balanced way that got him the job in the first place.
 

DC_Boy

New Member
May 20, 2005
17,608
5
Not disagreeing with you, but unusually felt compelled to defend him as he is normally pretty alright in his reporting.

Guess even at the BBC standards have dropped and he'd rather report on the negative side to make sure he gets his required number of hits on his blog to justify his new position, rather than report in the balanced way that got him the job in the first place.

fair comments MP :) I've no problem with your defending him, and doubtless he is a very nice and knowledgeable man but as you point out he still did the 'negative thing'
 

Azrael

Banned
May 23, 2004
9,377
14
in fact one good spin off from relegation might be that Levy might sell up cheaper to a billionaire benefactor ... then again ....
I doubt he would. I think once you lose PL status that's pretty much it for the huge buyout. A PL club is what the megarich are after.
 

jamesc0le

SISS:LOKO: el poncho de oro
Jun 17, 2008
4,976
945
if they did buy spurs maybe they would keep Levy in the job but with orders to loosen the transfer policies. i'm guessing that would be a good thing for spurs..
 

HodisGawd

Well-Known Member
Oct 3, 2005
1,745
5,958
You idiots.

Why have a go at Mihir Bose? Don't you think you just doing the typical dumb-ass response of shooting the messenger?

I've got no love for this guy but try not to just go into "I hate journo" mode because it is pointless.

The article is quite interesting but doesn't tell us anything we don't know. Fair enough. That's no reason to have a go at the author.

And why complain that he's painting a negative picture? The picture IS fucking negative as I'm sure YOU'VE been saying.

Why say he's "hardly reporting in a balanced way"? The article isn't biased in any way it is just telling it how it is and it is BAD.

In fact, if you actually read the article I think what he's trying to say to Spurs fans is POSITIVE - i.e. it's not as bad as you think, the club isn't in meltdown.

Now for fuck's sake debate the article properly.
 

danielneeds

Kick-Ass
May 5, 2004
24,183
48,814
The article is quite interesting but doesn't tell us anything we don't know. Fair enough. That's no reason to have a go at the author.

Also the article isn't mean't for hardcore spurs fans like us who trawl through newsnow reading every little tit bit of news on our club, but it is on the main BBC football site offering an insight to the average football fan on what is going on at the club.
 

JKSpurs

Member
Jan 30, 2006
887
38
very well written article and I think he hits the nail on the head with the fact spurs are a very well run club but some of the decision that levy makes have had a negative affect on the clubs footballing progress.

Although he doesn't mention the two succesful 5th finishes I think he could of tied this in with his piece abouit spurs doing quite well when they had older players who could steer the club in the right direction.

I personally feel the reason we are struggling so much at the moment is there are no leaders at the club and the promising youngester are to worried about failing.
 

DC_Boy

New Member
May 20, 2005
17,608
5
I still say it's a biased piece that ignores the postives of Levy's reign - yes he's not writing just for Spurs fans, even more important then to get it right and point out how well we've done over the past 3 seasons if he wants to have a dig at the downsides, which of course is his perogative
 

Dan Ashcroft

Manstack vs The Gay Chimney
Jan 6, 2008
6,404
1,147
Any odds on the British bid being Ashley and Kemsley?!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't shareholder votes need 2/3 to carry a major motion. If ENIC already own 80% then they can either just do what they want anyway, or at least trigger the compulsory purchase of the rest any time they want.

Can't see them selling at all though tbh.
 

roosh

aka tottenham_til_i_die
Sep 21, 2006
4,627
573
of course we still attract interest - the club is worth a lot of money

even if we got relegated we'd attract interest

in fact one good spin off from relegation might be that Levy might sell up cheaper to a billionaire benefactor ... then again ....

incidentally note that the article fails to mention we won the Carling Cup last year and over the past 3 years have been the fifth best club in the country

but why present a fair picture

Struggling Spurs still attract financial interest
The club are about to announce very good set of results for the year ending in June. This could see profits climb to about £30m and turnover rise to £115m, with the increases due to Spurs' Carling Cup victory and higher income from the new Sky-Setanta Premier League television deal.

Yeah, no mention of it at all - who does this guy think he is??

granted it does fail to mention that we finished 5th 2 years in a row, but if he had mentioned it it could have been used to further back up his point, that Levy's decisions - to sell some of our best players, and sack the manager who guided us to those 2 5th place finishes - have had the desired financial effect, but have cost us on the field.

the problem is, that the fact spurs keep turning over profits, which appeases the shareholders. that fact that we are where we are in the league doesn't really matter to them. I think Levy is almost afraid to incur losses for a few years, bcos he risks the wrath of the shareholders.
The paradox is, if he were to incur these losses (in terms of paying players higher wages and not being so tight when it comes to negotiations) then the result could see us break into the CL and see us generating even bigger profits.

perhaps, he himself doesn't see it as a realistic possibility that we could challenge the top 4.
 

yanno

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2003
5,857
2,877
Any odds on the British bid being Ashley and Kemsley?

:razz::eek:mg::bang:

Dan - you'd better not be ITK on this.

Ashley & Kemsley buying Spurs is about the only thing I can imagine that's worse than when we were managed by the Boring Goon Crook in the Overcoat.....
 

Dan Ashcroft

Manstack vs The Gay Chimney
Jan 6, 2008
6,404
1,147
:razz::eek:mg::bang:

Dan - you'd better not be ITK on this.

Ashley & Kemsley buying Spurs is about the only thing I can imagine that's worse than when we were managed by the Boring Goon Crook in the Overcoat.....

No. But it's a 'devil you know' warning to the 'Levy out' voices. The only real interest in buying ENIC out in the past 8 years or so has come from Ashley-Kemsley and also David 'dildo' Sullivan. Luckily Levy has always promised not to sell the club to anyone he doesn't think could do a better job than he could.

The odds of us getting an Abramovich or Khaldoon Al Mubarak are extremely long though.
 
Top