- Mar 29, 2005
- 7,924
- 15,376
Albert Gudmundsson probably considered a better deal. Might be the better player as well.
But when we do they are usually CAA Base clients, like Eze.I’m not sure he’s a priority. We are terrible at getting deals like this done. We rarely buy players from within the Premier League and especially not from financially stable clubs or players with full contracts.
Worth keeping in mind WLB said previously we really like Baena so good chance he be the alternative to Eze.Albert Gudmundsson probably considered a better deal. Might be the better player as well.
he’s a priority.. This is a player the clubs had interest for over 3 years now.
we’ve struggled with teams in certain defensive blocks going back to the Pochettino era, because we’ve lacked a player of his ability.
Depends I guess if we like onyedika and think he can step up immediately, like vdv or udogie did. Possible even fofana would wouldn’t cost more than£40m surely.There is no way we are spending over £60 million on a player who would be a nice one to have rather than somebody who would come in and address one of the critical weaknesses the team currently has. Eze is good but there are other players out there who can do similar things to what he can but for a fraction of the cost.
I'd much rather we spent £60m+ on a top class defensive midfielder to be honest.
There is no way we are spending over £60 million on a player who would be a nice one to have rather than somebody who would come in and address one of the critical weaknesses the team currently has. Eze is good but there are other players out there who can do similar things to what he can but for a fraction of the cost.
I'd much rather we spent £60m+ on a top class defensive midfielder to be honest.
At Tottenham, in a squad.Where would he play?
I would if we were tweaking the system to a 3-2-4-1 similar to City, that would allow for 2 number 10s and not block the path for some of our promising youngsters. £60m for a Maddison rotation i cant see.Min £60mil for him and Eze seems to be doing the rounds today.
Would any of you take Eze for £60mil?
Villa apparently have a "buy back" clause inserted. I'd be gobsmacked if this wasn't exercised seeing as he'd represent next to nothing in cost (taking into consideration the fee Hull have already paid), HG and club trained.I’ll be taking a closer look at Jaden Philogene if Eze is out of the picture. From what I have seen, they are similar with Philogene looking more like a winger of the two. In all honesty, I haven’t see a lot of him, but will now take more interest.
He makes the game look so EzeLove a bit of eze.
Villa apparently have a "buy back" clause inserted. I'd be gobsmacked if this wasn't exercised seeing as he'd represent next to nothing in cost (taking into consideration the fee Hull have already paid), HG and club trained.
Also, an u21 international and a player they wont want to see sign elsewhere in a year or two and make Villa look foolish for selling in the first instance.
The buy back clause is reported to be £15m, nobody else apart from Villa get him for under 25m, imo.He's have to want to go there, is a London lad, and his brother plays for our U15s.
So not nailed on they get him back.
The buy back clause is reported to be £15m, nobody else apart from Villa get him for under 25m, imo.
That's another £10m hypothetically Villa could put towards his wages/signing on fee.
Now tell me where he's going..?
The operative word from my post was towards.If they want to give him a £10m signing on fee
The operative word from my post was towards.
Nobody is saying Villa are dropping a 10m signing-on fee for a Championship winger, but 10m difference between Villa and Spurs could be the difference between a London lad all of a sudden developing a Brummy accent.