What's new

Chris Wood

Strikeb4ck

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2010
4,483
9,409
Chris Wood*

Very underrated player, would be a good signing. I think he counts as HG too.

Goal every 180 or so minutes in the Prem for a side like Burnley is nothing to scoff at, and he operates well as a target man if needed too.
 

Erm33

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2019
3,976
7,635
Good option to have available if Kane is rested or unavailable.
 

GetKaned

COYS
Aug 19, 2017
858
4,101
While I am happy we are trying to bring experienced players in this window, 60 is a tad old innit ? But trust Jose I guess
 

EZSpur

Well-Known Member
Jun 6, 2007
918
1,115
Chris Wood*

Very underrated player, would be a good signing. I think he counts as HG too.

Goal every 180 or so minutes in the Prem for a side like Burnley is nothing to scoff at, and he operates well as a target man if needed too.

Yup! He does count as HG, he's been playing in England since he was 16
 

Hotspur88

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2008
3,152
75,216
Mentioned the other day in the Costa thread about knowing an ex footballer who coaches at Burnley now and is close to Chris Wood through Horse Racing. I just asked him again about it to see if he could get anything out of Wood regarding the news and he said he had heard from him but wasn't allowed to say anything. Now I know that could mean anything but certainly suggests something may be happening. I've asked for more info, but not sure I'll get it.
 

THFCSPURS19

The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
Jan 6, 2013
37,890
130,524
Mentioned the other day in the Costa thread about knowing an ex footballer who coaches at Burnley now and is close to Chris Wood through Horse Racing. I just asked him again about it to see if he could get anything out of Wood regarding the news and he said he had heard from him but wasn't allowed to say anything. Now I know that could mean anything but certainly suggests something may be happening. I've asked for more info, but not sure I'll get it.
Other clubs have been linked with him so might not necessarily be us (although I obvs have no idea how you phrased the question!).
 
Top