I’d suggest Traore is even more likely now tbh, strikers less likely to commit and Adama makes more sense with Son and Kane.I believe its Traore or a striker, regardless of Kane.
I’d suggest Traore is even more likely now tbh, strikers less likely to commit and Adama makes more sense with Son and Kane.I believe its Traore or a striker, regardless of Kane.
So bored with this conversation - dozens of pages of the same stuff like it’s on loop.
We know some people believe he’ll add nothing, whilst others believe he’d be a great addition.
We know his end product isn’t great, but he has some other great traits and attributes.
Is anyone going to change their opinion based on a post here? Thought not
One point that needs to be addressed is for any new incoming non home grown players some existing non home grown players need shifting. So unless SA/MS get shifted we are up shit creek without a paddle. In all honesty would you be happy taking either with wage demands? This does also raise the question why get rid of Hart and loose a spot when not essential
I maybe wrong but reading another blog today they stated we were maxed out for non home grown players and unless some of the deadwood is moved out we cannot bring inDo you know how many Non-HG spots we have available? Or are you guessing that we don't have any open spots?
We currently have 14 non-HG players (by the PL definition) in the squad - so could add 3 more, even if nobody leaves. We would have to leave 1 or 2 out of the Euro squad though.One point that needs to be addressed is for any new incoming non home grown players some existing non home grown players need shifting. So unless SA/MS get shifted we are up shit creek without a paddle. In all honesty would you be happy taking either with wage demands? This does also raise the question why get rid of Hart and loose a spot when not essential
Just looked it up, 17 non 8 homeI maybe wrong but reading another blog today they stated we were maxed out for non home grown players and unless some of the deadwood is moved out we cannot bring in
All these “ooh his shot went for a throw in” comments are way OTT. I saw Salah hit one out last season, pretty sure I’ve seen Son do it as well. On that basis are they bad players?He also completely fluffed a 1-on-1 (twice in 2 games) and hit a shot which went out for a throw-in. When you weigh it up that isn't more than acceptable.
Thanks, still love to see some home grownWe currently have 14 non-HG players (by the PL definition) in the squad - so could add 3 more, even if nobody leaves. We would have to leave 1 or 2 out of the Euro squad though.
Personally, I believe that he has the attributes similar to those of Dembele. Strong on the ball, quicker and he doesn’t always have to have the assist. Causing mayhem and box to box maybe his role in the Spurs side.So bored with this conversation - dozens of pages of the same stuff like it’s on loop.
We know some people believe he’ll add nothing, whilst others believe he’d be a great addition.
We know his end product isn’t great, but he has some other great traits and attributes.
Is anyone going to change their opinion based on a post here? Thought not
Must say - I think Traore would be even better with Kane feeding him
Still think Kane and Son should be getting rested every Thursday until the latter stages of the ECL. As such, we obviously need a striker capable of scoring a hatful on Thursdays (much like Vinicius did).
Even just a loan for a decent striker would be fine if we're bringing in Adama too. Adama at the cost of an actual striker though - I don't see how that works.
We have been led to believe there’s money available regardless of Kane stayingKane staying with us which is good news, but that means we would not get £150 million to spend. And we just spent a little bit for Sarr. The question is do we have enough money to sign Traore? Or someone else? I mean other than Ndombele, I never heard anyone interested in any of our players that we are trying to sell.