What's new

ENIC...

Status
Not open for further replies.

smithym

Formerly smithmeister
Apr 27, 2005
6,272
2,374
Bring it on is all I can say.
If you can’t beat them, join them.
More than happy to be a Qatari play thing if it means the club starts winning trophies.
 

geordiespur

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2010
318
912
Have always been against this but it gets to a point where it’s going to need oil (or oil like) money to remove Levy. And I’m all for the latter happening now.
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,616
64,407
I will also view this news update as pinch of salt, ahead of NLD. I wouldnt be surprised if this is somehow intentional update leak from Levy...
It is quite amusing. The report says they intend to meet with a number of clubs and the only name that gets dropped is Spurs. Regardless of my thoughts on the matter I bet nothing will develop regarding a deal with us.
 

robin09

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2005
6,800
7,697
It’s very hard to accumulate billions in a completely clean, ethically pure manner.

It’s a matter of degrees on the ‘arsehole-o-meter’.

Qatar, and (basically most) Middle Eastern petrol-states are the absolute worst in terms of bigotry, curtailing freedom of expression and human rights abuses in general.

If winning a trophy means that much to fans, that they can be bought to forget about all that, ok.
But any trophy we win after being bought by one of these nations, will have a massive asterisk next to it anyway.

As someone said recently, it would the equivalent of losing your virginity to a prostitute. Meaningless.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,537
147,620
I’m going to be totally honest, I’m not going to bring Joe Lewis into it at all, but I still use Google, Amazon, Visa, Disney, PayPal and Sainsbury’s. And I bet a lot of not all of us use some of them, which is not really much different than supporting a club that has a similar minority stake owned by one of those countries you mentioned.
It’s completely different. And it’s frankly laughable that you’d suggest it was anywhere near the same thing.

When did Amazon last execute 81 people in one day?

When did Disney last castrate someone for being gay?

Have Google stoned any women to death for adultery in the last 12 months?

Can you tell me how many people PayPal have put on trial for blasphemy in the last decade?

When was the last time Visa imprisoned someone for witchcraft?

Sainsbury’s ??? fucking Sainsbury’s?! Are they taking journalists out into the desert beating them to within an inch of their lives and leaving them there now?
 

SheffieldAndy

Friends with the monster under my bed.
Jul 4, 2012
1,677
1,985
It’s completely different. And it’s frankly laughable that you’d suggest it was anywhere near the same thing.

When did Amazon last execute 81 people in one day?

When did Disney last castrate someone for being gay?

Have Google stoned any women to death for adultery in the last 12 months?

Can you tell me how many people PayPal have put on trial for blasphemy in the last decade?

When was the last time Visa imprisoned someone for witchcraft?

Sainsbury’s ??? fucking Sainsbury’s?! Are they taking journalists out into the desert beating them to within an inch of their lives and leaving them there now?
The Qataris and Saudis all own minority stakes in all of those businesses. But way to totally miss the point ?
 

HodisGawd

Well-Known Member
Oct 3, 2005
1,745
5,958
I’m going to be totally honest, I’m not going to bring Joe Lewis into it at all, but I still use Google, Amazon, Visa, Disney, PayPal and Sainsbury’s. And I bet a lot if not all of us use some of them, which is not really much different than supporting a club that has a similar minority stake owned by one of those countries you mentioned.
You are the kid of person the Putins, the human rights abusers and the sports washers call a "useful idiot". You are doing their job for them, making their arguments for them. There is no moral equivalence here. Give it up.
 

SheffieldAndy

Friends with the monster under my bed.
Jul 4, 2012
1,677
1,985
You are the kid of person the Putins, the human rights abusers and the sports washers call a "useful idiot". You are doing their job for them, making their arguments for them. There is no moral equivalence here. Give it up.
I’m not using morale equivalence at all, I’m saying that if people are outraged about the thought of them holding a minority stake in Tottenham, and will stop supporting the club, they should be consistent and stop using other businesses/services that are minority owned by them too.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,537
147,620
The Qataris and Saudis all own minority stakes in all of those businesses. But way to totally miss the point ?
Fucking hell I did a bit didn’t I ?

I still don’t see it as the same thing though tbh. That’s just investment. They aren’t buying the likes of City Psg and Newcastle as a nest egg. It’s about politics and soft power.

I don’t want them anywhere near the club. I’d rather go back to being owned by Sugar.
 

SheffieldAndy

Friends with the monster under my bed.
Jul 4, 2012
1,677
1,985
Fucking hell I did a bit didn’t I ?

I still don’t see it as the same thing though tbh. That’s just investment. They aren’t buying the likes of City Psg and Newcastle as a nest egg. It’s about politics and soft power.

I don’t want them anywhere near the club. I’d rather go back to being owned by Sugar.
While I’ll agree to disagree about them having a minority stake in someone like Tottenham or Braga as any different, I do agree that outright ownership is a different beast all together as with the clubs you mentioned.

And I can totally understand someone not wanting them to invest
 

Tottenhamboy85

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2018
2,512
7,932
I think there’s also a point of how it would actually affect our spending. I’m not entirely sure we would see any significant increase in money spent on players as they would only have a minor stake in the club.
Sure but they’ll can prob call in some favours and get big sponsorship deals like city do
 

danielneeds

Kick-Ass
May 5, 2004
24,183
48,814
If we put the ethical considerations aside, there’s one thing that we can all agree on - if this is basically the QSI looking to choose an PL club to spunk some money into, you can guarantee it won’t be us, and infact it will be one our most hated rivals who will get a power-up boost.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,537
147,620
While I’ll agree to disagree about them having a minority stake in someone like Tottenham or Braga as any different, I do agree that outright ownership is a different beast all together as with the clubs you mentioned.

And I can totally understand someone not wanting them to invest
I just don’t think that a minority investment will stay as a minority investment. I could just about tolerate them sponsoring the shirt or stadium that would still be awful imo. But having an actual stake, and a sizeable one at that? No thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top