So is it a lack of DD? If there was information about it? I mean, not being funny, if forum posters know about it, then the people in charge of such things know about it too. That's for damn sure.
In the same way you buy a multi-storey car park that might fall down in the next two years, but that would probably save you a few mill on demolition costs so you take the risk that it doesn't kill anyone before you've cleared the tenants out of the centre below.
I don't like the assumption that we just blindly signed him. But then I don't like the further assumption that people don't have the capacity to play wildly differently and/or buck up their ideas depending on which manager they play under.
I work for some partners better than others, not because I'm a bad egg but because some know my strengths and how to get the best out of me.
Agreed. Every club makes mistakes in terms of scouting. One of our buys from this Summer will be a dud. Just how it goes.We've made some absolute bargains over the years too so I don't think it is such a big deal that we lose out on Ndombele. You can go big on a player with all the expectation that they are special and it can backfire. Yet you can also take a chance on a bargain and strike gold. I'm not going to worry about the losses we've had on him, we're still financially strong and in a great position spending big this window.
One would think so. And maybe things have changed, but quotes from Redknapp on our scouting of Luis Suarez really makes you wonder what our recruiting process looked like back then. Obviously we never got to assess personality in that case, as Suarez was deemed being too similar to VDV…
Tottenham tried to sign Luis Suárez but were told he was not up to it
Harry Redknapp has revealed he tried to sign Luis Suárez but his scouts told him he was not good enough to play up front on his ownwww.theguardian.com
FOH FridayNow that would be a Funtime Friday!
And he’ll be motivated to put in the effort, to keep the ultras from burning his house downThis would be a good move for Tanguy. A really good club and the coach is one of the best around.
what bothers me is that they both offered very little during prime Kane/Son years, we needed to surround Kane and Son with good players and these two were flops big time and expensive ones at that. But oh well can’t turn back the clock, onwards and upwards.Seeing him and Lo Celso strongly linked away is good to see.
Got the feeling neither committed that much and will go down as worst deals we have ever done.
Fingers crossed they are buying him.
Sorry, but you’re misunderstanding//conflating what I am saying. First off, I didn’t said nowt about Levy. Nor am I suggesting that the Chairman had background info on the player, and despite potential misgivings, backed his manager. No one is fully attuned to the discussions between Daniel and Poch about the player, and if the character issues was known by both. They made a decision based on the facts/sentiments available at that time. In short: I never said that the the cheque writers should have pulled the plug. Nor, am I saying that we knowingly gambled.The manager identified a player he wanted and you think Levy should have over ruled it thinking he knows better.
Isn’t this the exact kind of thing he often gets criticised for? It seems we want Levy to stay away from footballing decisions unless it doesn’t work out in hindsight.