What's new

The beginning of the end...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Blackrat1299

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2006
5,368
6,404
A few of the senior players are not happy ATM with tactics and individual roles/responsibilities within those tactics,.

How that's seen from the club's pov may well be different to how the players themselves see it!

Remember nearly all my stuff comes from agents not from the club.

You have just made me look at the situation in a different light. It has been mentioned a few times about Lloris hanging onto the captaincy, Lucas losing out to Kane in the final, The diamond formation, and 3 at the back for the wrong games. It looks like an melting pot pot of all our troubles.
 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
22,321
80,354
I do suspect Kane is one of them. The two man forward line is something to consider in tough away games, but we need to move away from it in the majority of games. Let Kane go back to being at the sharp end of the attack, where one smart little pass can give him a shot on goal. Moura just isn't cutting it against the low block. He occupies Kane's space and doesn't offer anything when he drops deep.

Dele will be another, he took a lot of flak last year when doing a job for the team. Let him play off of Kane again and I think we'll see an improvement on both.

As for the formation, I think the big complaint amongst the players will be the diamond formation and the pressure it puts on our full backs. The other thing will be the constant changes to formations and personnel. It's good we are becoming adapatable, but right now we need to go back to the early days and just establish a rock solid plan A. That's up to Poch.
Agreed! Lucas is more of an impact player and can make a difference again at tired legs or in games that are more stretched. But whenever we come up against the low block he should only start if Kane is unavailable.

Son is different as he can effect the game by cutting in and he has that surprise element of shooting from all angles.

On numerous occasions we've got Son stood on the left corner of the penalty area, Lamela inside and then both Kane and Lucas next to each other taking the same spaces up and making similar runs. If you're a defender you just stay with one or the other, easy.

If Kane is up top alone, you've got Sonny cutting in, making it harder to pick him up, then you can have Alli coming from deep and eventually Lo Celso floating. This will make us much more unpredictable and give Kane more room as the deep and I side runs take away markers.

We need Kane to start to be able to face up to defenders on individual battles again.

It's no coincidence our best attacking play has decreased since Lucas joined. It's just chemistry sometimes, doesn't mean I don't like Lucas or think he's not an exceptional talent (he certainly is) but if there is no rhythm you have to look at why and take what's not working out.
 

Kiedis

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2013
2,926
8,490
#BackPoch, but only when it's really about me wanting a Spurs shirt with Dybala on the back and having spent the early days of Deadline Day taking pictures of myself doing his goal celebration in front of the mirror.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,986
71,405
Poch is beginning the long, hard rebuild whether we like it or not. And you know what? It is needed. This squad has needed freshening up for 2 years, IMO. The only eyebrow raising decision is he’s dropped Jan. Personally, i’d have dropped Toby instead. I’d have also dropped Eriksen out of the first team to get him to fuck off.

I have a feeling the XI when at full health will be Lloris, KWP, Toby, Sanchez, Sessegnon, Dier, Ndombele, GLC, Dele, Son, Kane

Dybala would have slotted in for Son or Dele had he come. I think 2 AM/W would come in the summer, 2 CB’s, and an RB to back up KWP. Lamela, Toby, Jan, Eriksen, Sissoko and Rose will go.
 

shelfmonkey

Weird is different, different is interesting.
Mar 21, 2007
6,690
8,040
Ahh was waiting for this... are the players on low contracts and not wanting to resign Levy's fault or Pochs?

Eriksen is different, but none of the three are because of Levy/money!

Oh dear!!! So tick tock it is then?!!
 

shelfmonkey

Weird is different, different is interesting.
Mar 21, 2007
6,690
8,040
Couple of great posts there. My one concern is whether Poch really has the heart for it at this moment in time. He was getting increasingly tetchy throughout our prolonged dip in form last season and then went into full blown euphoria at the CL quarter and semi final stages, and then into full on sulk after the final defeat. It all seemed very bi-polar.

The pattern has continued with a poor start to the season and all the transfer shenanigens which seem to have upset him, when he really should be enthused by the fact that Levy has delivered the 3 players he most wanted. That seems to be overshadowed by whatever issues are going on behind the scenes. As I've said before, elite managers take this stuff in their stride and if that's where Poch thinks he is, he needs to shape up and get the team motivated and firing on all cylinders. He needs to stop all the cryptic press conference bullshit which is doing as much to rock the boat as anything else and show some of the loyalty he displayed when Levy left him high and dry time and again in the transfer market.

Yep. Man up? or ?
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,451
48,570
The other thing is, his public comments he's made about his own future, fueling the uncertainty, has been a bit of an insult to the fans and club. He seems to have become very self serving over the last 12 months.

If you look at it objectively, it seems the wheels came off quite profoundly when Poch was linked to the United job in January and he did absolutely nothing to quash the rumours. I'm not saying it's all linked, but players are not stupid. They see the speculation. They probably wondered if Poch was casting eyes elsewhere, doubted his commitment? maybe in turn Poch started doubting theirs?

Or maybe the wheels came off before that. I've grown quite sick and tired the way he constantly seems to tease us with leaving his future so open and out there. Like he enjoys the uncertainty. Noone can deny he has come out with some utter bewildering quotes about his future, things that just didn't need to be said. Particularly towards the end of last season. We all commented on the quotes at the time, trying to understand his motivations for saying the things he was. We all guessed he was putting pressure on Levy but maybe it was the players and maybe he has failed at that.

Sometimes things run their course. It is very feasible the squad needs a new voice, different methods, a new project. If Poch does go, I'd like to see us go for a manager who has actually won things. I want to see exciting football but most of all I want to see us win trophies. It's hardly like we've been entertained over the past 18 months with Poch's football is it? His style of play is non existent and one of the most boring styles out there now, we've turned into AVB football.
Spot on. So Mouriniho or Allegri then?
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,451
48,570
That was unbelievable. Days before our biggest game in decades and he throws his future into doubt, lo and behold we then put in an utterly abject and demotivated performance.

Something stinks.

I think the people who think we are overreacting are going to get a nasty surprise, wouldn't surprise me if Poch was gone fairly soon.
If anything the comments in the media and pressers etc are much more of a problem than the performances and results. Gone is the happy positive poch who got the fans and players all pulling in the same direction, now he speaks in riddles and just throws constant fuel to the fire about his future.

There is no benefit whatsoever to doing that and I wish he’d stop it, if he wants to leave just fucking leave, put a bit of pressure on levy from time to time sure but the comments have been so consistent and for so long now around 9 months that it just stinks and is adversely effecting the fans mood and confidence and in turn the players performances.

Yes stuff is going on behind the scenes I’m sure but poch hasn’t helped things and it’s getting tiring now. Big game for the manager on Sunday.
 

Maske2g

SC Supporter
Feb 1, 2005
4,257
1,726
You seem to go very hard on our good luck and not so much on our bad. We gave City 2 good games in the CL. Lucas hat trick wasn’t luck. It’s was exciting, entertaining, nail biting, but it was a Poch/Levy signing living up to his potential. Just as much as any player who scores against us does. This complete dismissal of all the positive things we’ve achieved and the incessant highlighting of the negative is really only self-serving to a narrative that we lost to Newcastle and people have jettisoned the fragile amount of patience they hold to have a moan while we’re down.
Gave City a good game away in the Champions league? Are you sure?


We defended like children! It was daylight robbery!
Thankfully LaPorte gave use a couple of chances. (Take nothing away from the 2nd finish) & Llorente scored with his hip. Even the goal that never was showed sup for what we are in big games. Utter cowards.
 

-Afri-Coy-

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2012
5,862
18,632
I don't feel he justifies his place in the side at all. It's just my opinion, but if I feel like that watching games, I wonder if some of the players do.

Winks feels like Poch's pet. We will have to agree to disagree that he has grabbed his chance. Our CM last season was weak as hell, Sissoko carried us, Winks didn't.

All I'm saying is Trix mentioned that some senior players are unhappy with an or some individuals role in the team. To me Winks is the obvious candidate. We have been setting up with Winks as our DM and he doesn't protect the defence, so I can see why it could very well be linked to Verts making a comment. Based on the first 3 games, our defence has been exposed far too easily, even in the Villa game, when they broke on us they looked like scoring every opportunity. Same with Newcastle. We have zero protection, yet Poch sets up the same way. If we set up like that again on Sunday we will get a mauling.

Don't know why you keep getting slated for a really reasonable view on Winks. Maybe you're a little extreme but you have to be to get your across to some of the members with spurs academy tinted glasses.

Don't get me wrong, Winks is definitely a talented player and has had some exceptional moments for us in certain games including big games but at the moment he really doesn't add much value to the team in terms of doing the job he is being given. We simply cannot have a midfield built around Winks, he is not Xavi or Iniesta as some on here would think he is.

Whether this drop in form is down to him or Poch I don't know but I do agree that he is being picked regardless of his performances on the pitch. Don't let the stats fool you, he has been pretty useless bar the odd good moment since the Villa game.

But I would put this down to Poch and his tactics. Cannot blame the player when he's simply trying to do what he's asked to do. If he's being asked to do a job he can't fulfill, that needs to fall on Poch's head and not Winks.

Let's get back to basics and throw away this stupid diamond formation which has not and will not work for us. There is a reason the two best teams in the league are playing a 4-3-3 formation. It's the best formation to use at the moment if you want to play attacking, fluid football even against the bus parkers. Press hard and attack with intent, no more stationary forwards or sideways passing midfielders, we need movement and vision and the willingness to win.

We used to be able to fight to the death and in fact we were winning most of our games after 70 mins, we seem to have lost that never say never attitude and it shows. No last minute pressure, no moments of brilliance, we just seem so flat and timid at the moment.

I have faith that Poch can turn it around, but it honestly doesn't seem like he wants too.
 

Maske2g

SC Supporter
Feb 1, 2005
4,257
1,726
This would be a good argument if it wasn't so myopic.

Why is it we're the ones who were considered to be 'lucky' when we were missing key players in the games against Man City and Ajax?
Why is it we're the ones who were 'shit the bed' when we dropped points meaning that we let Arsenal, Chelsea and Man Utd back into the race for top 4

etc etc...

Luck argument doesn't wash with me, it's bollocks I'm afraid and we'd be here all day arguing the toss, that's why I said we are where we are, not where we could have been.
I agree. And where we are, is a million miles away from where we were 3 seasons ago, with a thinly veiled bit of paper hanging loosely over the cracks.
 

Dougal

Staff
Jun 4, 2004
60,376
130,330
Gave City a good game away in the Champions league? Are you sure?


We defended like children! It was daylight robbery!
Thankfully LaPorte gave use a couple of chances. (Take nothing away from the 2nd finish) & Llorente scored with his hip. Even the goal that never was showed sup for what we are in big games. Utter cowards.
How many teams would even be still in it in injury time? It was a crazy game and we played our part. A lot of teams would have crumbled after the early goal.
 

Maske2g

SC Supporter
Feb 1, 2005
4,257
1,726
Ponced 2 wins? We didn't ponce anything off City. We Scored 4 goals against them over 2 games of football. Stop rewriting our history mate.

In the 2nd game I saw some of the worst defending I've ever seen. We absolutely melted at the back to a man. They can all have a say for knob of the match.

Trippier for the first, absolutely no where near him and no interest in getting near him.

2nd goal. Rose, same as above.

3rd. Players falling over while passing on runners. Jan's feeble attempt at the front post.

4th. Embarrasing. Actually shit their pants, we had about 5 players to their 2.

The non goal. . Not enough room on the page. Lloris, Eriksen, Toby, Take you pick. Absolutely shit the bed.
 

Spursfan1414

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2015
334
1,574
Sure he's loving it at the minute as he seems to get picked regardless of how poorly he plays.
What’s been so poor about Winks? Or is this just him being entirely blamed for playing sideways passes while we ignore the absolute lack of any decent movement upfront?

There are way, way bigger issues with our play than Harry Winks at the moment.
 

Dougal

Staff
Jun 4, 2004
60,376
130,330
What’s been so poor about Winks? Or is this just him being entirely blamed for playing sideways passes while we ignore the absolute lack of any decent movement upfront?

There are way, way bigger issues with our play than Harry Winks at the moment.
I don’t think Winks is an issue here, no evidence, just a crowbarred agenda.
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
In the 2nd game I saw some of the worst defending I've ever seen. We absolutely melted at the back to a man. They can all have a say for knob of the match.

Trippier for the first, absolutely no where near him and no interest in getting near him.

2nd goal. Rose, same as above.

3rd. Players falling over while passing on runners. Jan's feeble attempt at the front post.

4th. Embarrasing. Actually shit their pants, we had about 5 players to their 2.

The non goal. . Not enough room on the page. Lloris, Eriksen, Toby, Take you pick. Absolutely shit the bed.

Don't get your point, honestly?
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
In the 2nd game I saw some of the worst defending I've ever seen. We absolutely melted at the back to a man. They can all have a say for knob of the match.

Trippier for the first, absolutely no where near him and no interest in getting near him.

2nd goal. Rose, same as above.

3rd. Players falling over while passing on runners. Jan's feeble attempt at the front post.

4th. Embarrasing. Actually shit their pants, we had about 5 players to their 2.

The non goal. . Not enough room on the page. Lloris, Eriksen, Toby, Take you pick. Absolutely shit the bed.

Doesn't really mean anything considering his original point was that we scored 4 goals.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top