Burnley vs Tottenham: Match Thread

tony0379

The bald midget has to go!

May 17, 2004

15,960

41,801

• Apr 1, 2017

• #881

9 fucking minutes at Chelsea?

 

Bobbins

SC's 14th Sexiest Male 2008

May 5, 2005

21,630

45,285

• Apr 1, 2017

• #882

Bobbins said:

FFS 8 minutes of added time at Stamford Bridge?

Click to expand...

Nearly at 100 minutes still no whistle...

 

joey.leone

Well-Known Member

Oct 10, 2005

2,086

1,593

• Apr 1, 2017

• #883

Wow it is still playing afyer 10 added mins?

 

C

Cheds

Well-Known Member

Aug 22, 2013

250

429

• Apr 1, 2017

• #884

DEFchenkOE said:

So guys, Edwards or Onomah for the bench v Swansea?

Click to expand...

Edwards.......long overdue

 

C0YS

Just another member

Jul 9, 2007

12,780

13,817

• Apr 1, 2017

• #885

Very very impressive win. Can't be overstated. We are the first team to beat them by more than one goal at home and this was one of the fixtures I really thought we'd struggle to win.

Burnley showed how effective they are at this system. While we missed our fullbacks, Kane and also jet-lagged Son. Burnley were superb at how they defended. Once we scored they looked shattered.

 

A

Ashen

Well-Known Member

Jun 4, 2011

629

698

• Apr 1, 2017

• #886

Seriously, why are there 9 extra minutes because the rich team is losing?

 

C

Cruyff

Active Member

Jan 28, 2005

575

358

• Apr 1, 2017

• #887

B

JayB said:

It's amazing how much more assured he looks in that position.

Click to expand...

But why can't Poch see it?

 

ziggy

Well-Known Member

Dec 23, 2003

4,453

3,095

• Apr 1, 2017

• #888

9 mins wtf

 

C0YS

Just another member

Jul 9, 2007

12,780

13,817

• Apr 1, 2017

• #889

Two subs in injury time, but seems excessive.

 

Hazardousman

Audere est Facere

Jul 24, 2013

4,619

8,944

• Apr 1, 2017

• #890

And people say corruption doesn't exist, Chelsea get 10 mins added time, has anyone ever seen that before from one injury?

 

Y

yankspurs

Enic Out

Aug 22, 2013

41,996

71,428

• Apr 1, 2017

• #891

Great win. Worried about Wanyama and Winks. Picked up the 3 points on Chelsea. YES!

 

mark87

Well-Known Member

Nov 29, 2004

36,269

115,411

• Apr 1, 2017

• #892

Full time! Chelsea lose!

 

gushayes11

Well-Known Member

May 24, 2007

6,824

13,003

• Apr 1, 2017

• #893

Chelsea lose too!!

 

D

djw1973

Well-Known Member

Aug 23, 2013

375

969

• Apr 1, 2017

• #894

Fabulous result. Loads of injuries and the players stepped up. No Kane, Walker, Rose and Wanyama and Winks for a half.

They have only lost twice at home all season.

 

JayB

Well-Known Member

Aug 24, 2011

6,667

26,110

• Apr 1, 2017

• #895

Get the fuck in!! With City to play on Wednesday we may actually find ourselves in a title race.

 

ziggy

Well-Known Member

Dec 23, 2003

4,453

3,095

• Apr 1, 2017

• #896

10 !!!

 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member

Aug 25, 2011

22,414

80,744

• Apr 1, 2017

• #897

That was tough and very nervy for the majority but on reflection we were barely in trouble. We dealt and adapted well to injuries and Burnley's press. Chelsea were unable to produce that and Liverpool completely blew it there so I think we can feel extremely happy! Let's win the next 3 and really crank up the pressure!

 

TheVoiceofReason

Well-Known Member

Feb 5, 2005

6,337

15,727

• Apr 1, 2017

• #898

Get IN

 

tiger666

Large Member

Jan 4, 2005

27,978

82,216

• Apr 1, 2017

• #899

Ashen said:

Seriously, why are there 9 extra minutes because the rich team is losing?

Click to expand...

Scott Dann was down for a long time and stretchered off.

 

bubble07

Well-Known Member

Dec 27, 2004

23,252

30,446

• Apr 1, 2017

• #900

wow

7 point gap