- Oct 4, 2004
- 1,244
- 358
One slip of the finger.......
That's always your excuse.
One slip of the finger.......
One slip of the finger.......
might keep some happy i guess
One slip of the finger.......
*hint - A&C, Chris and Talkshow are doing most of the hard graft as mods of this thread, this year, and it's quite honestly, been one of the funnest yet.
Some days this thread is just off topic entirely. Today is one of those days.
1: Yes
2: No, there's the Read Only for catching up with the very latest. The live ticker will start when it gets really, really busy. Anyway, if we closed it and nobody was about to re-open the place when some ITK was posted, there would be carnage.
It's often a tough call when its quiet. What can and can't be posted is something that can sometimes seem inconsistent. We're constantly juggling in an attempt to keep everyone happy and doing our best.
And sometimes, when this thread is on form, the general banter is excellent.
Yeah I know the banter is excellent but when you see pages of pages of chat about whether a player is rated it can be a bit tedius - Along with the rather tenious justifcation that it is transfer related (it's not ...it's another opportunity to signal 'your' opinion on whether you like that player).
I don't want to seem like I'm moaning too much but often there's good information contained within these pages that isn't in the RO section and it's often hard to find for the reasons stated above (is the Hudd information even in the RO section?).
I love the funny bits (and to be honest they're usually more on topic) but I hate having to wade through the pages of debate (inc posts like this).
Is there a way of book marking the pages where ITK is being discussed so you can navigate straight to that page?
We'll all take it in turns to PM you anything you miss out on.
P.S Anything booby related would also be appreciated.
So if the ITK of the past week or so is to be believed, things should start getting interesting transfer wise from next week.
Also makes a nice change that the ITK's are not talking about shifting out the dead wood before we buy, which would be a welcome change in policy regarding transfers.
What deadwood do we have to shift? Huddlestone and Parker? Maybe Rose, Defoe, Adebayor and Benny. None of them who would bring in much to let us go out and spend again.
Hudd £5m, Parker £4m, Rose £6m, Defoe £9m, Ade £8m, Bae £7m. Roughly £40m in total. Not bad if they're just deadwood!
Obviously selling all them would mean we would need to buy 2 strikers, 1 left back, and possibly another CM.
i honestly wouldn't mind selling all those player but it will never happen!
You forgot Livermore, Naughton and Gomes also.Hudd £5m, Parker £4m, Rose £6m, Defoe £9m, Ade £8m, Bae £7m. Roughly £40m in total. Not bad if they're just deadwood!
Obviously selling all them would mean we would need to buy 2 strikers, 1 left back, and possibly another CM.
i honestly wouldn't mind selling all those player but it will never happen!
Hudd £5m, Parker £4m, Rose £6m, Defoe £9m, Ade £8m, Bae £7m. Roughly £40m in total. Not bad if they're just deadwood!
Obviously selling all them would mean we would need to buy 2 strikers, 1 left back, and possibly another CM.
i honestly wouldn't mind selling all those player but it will never happen!
Regarding POTL's info; weren't the press reporting that Baldini was in Spain to tie up Villa???
What deadwood do we have to shift? Huddlestone and Parker? Maybe Rose, Defoe, Adebayor and Benny. None of them who would bring in much to let us go out and spend again.
Yeah I know the banter is excellent but when you see pages of pages of chat about whether a player is rated it can be a bit tedius - Along with the rather tenious justifcation that it is transfer related (it's not ...it's another opportunity to signal 'your' opinion on whether you like that player).
I don't want to seem like I'm moaning too much but often there's good information contained within these pages that isn't in the RO section and it's often hard to find for the reasons stated above (is the Hudd information even in the RO section?).
I love the funny bits (and to be honest they're usually more on topic) but I hate having to wade through the pages of debate (inc posts like this).
Is there a way of book marking the pages where ITK is being discussed so you can navigate straight to that page?
Jenas, Gomes, Livermore, Naughton ...