- Jul 1, 2008
- 12,379
- 39,402
It looks like we are stuck with dr evil, but we do have Ange, a more balanced squad and 120m to spend to get our team in tip top shape.
That's poor man's Dr Evil to you
It looks like we are stuck with dr evil, but we do have Ange, a more balanced squad and 120m to spend to get our team in tip top shape.
Mini meThat's poor man's Dr Evil to you
Don't care. Hope Kane plays, and loses.Seen a Spurs ITK account on Twitter say that Levy tried to delay the deal to prevent Harry from playing tomorrow and winning a cup the day after leaving Spurs.
Really is a pathetic little man.
I’m sticking with dr evil for the bald fraud and I’ll never capitalise the E in evil, as he’s not worth pressing the caps lock button.That's poor man's Dr Evil to you
MaddisonI do hope some of Levy lovers out there reflect on this. We hired pragmatic managers to try and eek out silverware from an average squad instead of really investing in top players.
I'm pretty sure Kane would have tied himself to this club, but that means tying yourself to Levy too and who amongst us would willingly do that?
Did ENIC sell up that stake before Rangers went tits up?OK, due to popular demand (well, one PM asking if I still had it ) i'll post it again....
Back when ENIC first bought Rangers and Levy didn't know better and was happy to open his gob...........
View attachment 130468
I never really understand why this quote is used as a stick to beat Levy with. The majority of premiership owners chose to buy their clubs for the same reasons as Levy, to make money. It would likely be the same with any new owner.
Also, that was almost 30 years ago now. After working at the club for so long i would be surprised if he hasn't developed any emotional connection with it. He'll always be primarily business/finance focused, but most owners are nowadays.
We won’t spend £120 million, not a fucking chanceIt looks like we are stuck with dr evil, but we do have Ange, a more balanced squad and 120m to spend to get our team in tip top shape.