Hopefully soon..fingers crossedIs he ousted yet?
No but Conte and him will have a jousting match on the pitch at out next home gameIs he ousted yet?
That was supposed to be what Paratici’s appointment signalled. Levy can’t help himself though. He’s a control freak and he’s also set in his ways.If there was a way of keeping ENIC as owners but having some fresh input on decision making in the football arena and leave Levy to the commercial side of things, that would be ideal.
Finally some entertainment at the stadium!!!No but Conte and him will have a jousting match on the pitch at out next home game
Do you understand how to grow serious wealth without paying taxes?
Dividends are taxable income. Investing funds back in the business grows the original investment value - tax deferred - particularly when a lot of that reinvestment goes into tangible things like real estate, property development, new stadiums and the like.
Why do you believe Levy isn't keeping to the arrangement he had with Paratici? Surely if Paratici was being undermined he would walk away?That was supposed to be what Paratici’s appointment signalled. Levy can’t help himself though. He’s a control freak and he’s also set in his ways.
Good thing for whom?So you agree that he's not taking money out of the club and that the more successful the club is the greater the value of the investment. That sounds like a good thing.
Hope so. Just not liking what we're hearing at the moment.Why do you believe Levy isn't keeping to the arrangement he had with Paratici? Surely if Paratici was being undermined he would walk away?
Also, whenever Conte is asked about transfer business and club strategy, he always says he is happy and that Paratici, Levy and himself are all in agreement on how the club should move forward.
You not been around this place long? There’s been plenty ITK that Levy is sticking his oar in and not ceding control to Paratici.Why do you believe Levy isn't keeping to the arrangement he had with Paratici? Surely if Paratici was being undermined he would walk away?
Also, whenever Conte is asked about transfer business and club strategy, he always says he is happy and that Paratici, Levy and himself are all in agreement on how the club should move forward.
I feel the DL scape-goating is unfair. I expect alot of 'disagrees' but here we go:
1) Chelsea and Liverpool, clubs with more money and a better squad, are both below us currently.
2) Arsenal, widely ridiculed last season and the season before, are now title contenders
3) Man Utd was in the shits just before WC and has been for the last decade.
This tells you a couple of things:
1) Inherent problems in a squad take just more than money to fix. Chelsea's longstanding striker-problem was not solved, latest victim = Lukaku who we know is quality given what he did for Man Utd. Liverpool's TAA problem is being targeted (despite him being PL's best offensive fullback and is better than anything we ever had).
2) Patience matters. Arteta is prime example of that.
3) Spending big short term is not the answer. Everton backed Anchelotti wrongly, bring in his players, and has been struggling since.
Conclusions:
1) Consistently spending big is a pre-requisite to stay competitive
2) Willingness to spend may still result in failure as seen by Man Utd + Chelsea. We have our share of flops.
3) Consistently being within CL is an achievemnt in itself; it's about where we should be given our wage spend. Few fans appreciate this.
4) Our financial muscle will likely be bolstered by the new stadium but we've only had it recently. We haven't made enough money (saving) off it to justify spending big. Spending what you don't currently have is not prudent, and football is a long game.
Therefore it's reasonable that other fans think Spurs fans are entitled. We are about where we should be; trying to get into CL. Return on investment (in terms of recruitment) over the long run is what matters; because hopefully the gems will outweigh the flops.
DL's last 20 years had seen us rise from the Sugar era, to being where we should be. If you want him out, then you are asking for ownership to be flipped to someone more willing to spend; this makes sense, because short of being sovergin-backed, the fire-power is unlikely to change in the short term (and even it's flipped the money may never come).
I think DL-out is pre-mature.
Good thing for whom?
It hasn’t been a good thing for football success. It’s been a brilliant strategy for ENIC though.
So YEAH ENIC! ????
You not been around this place long? There’s been plenty ITK that Levy is sticking his oar in and not ceding control to Paratici.
I feel the DL scape-goating is unfair. I expect alot of 'disagrees' but here we go:
1) Chelsea and Liverpool, clubs with more money and a better squad, are both below us currently.
2) Arsenal, widely ridiculed last season and the season before, are now title contenders
3) Man Utd was in the shits just before WC and has been for the last decade.
This tells you a couple of things:
1) Inherent problems in a squad take just more than money to fix. Chelsea's longstanding striker-problem was not solved, latest victim = Lukaku who we know is quality given what he did for Man Utd. Liverpool's TAA problem is being targeted (despite him being PL's best offensive fullback and is better than anything we ever had).
2) Patience matters. Arteta is prime example of that.
3) Spending big short term is not the answer. Everton backed Anchelotti wrongly, bring in his players, and has been struggling since.
Conclusions:
1) Consistently spending big is a pre-requisite to stay competitive
2) Willingness to spend may still result in failure as seen by Man Utd + Chelsea. We have our share of flops.
3) Consistently being within CL is an achievemnt in itself; it's about where we should be given our wage spend. Few fans appreciate this.
4) Our financial muscle will likely be bolstered by the new stadium but we've only had it recently. We haven't made enough money (saving) off it to justify spending big. Spending what you don't currently have is not prudent, and football is a long game.
Therefore it's reasonable that other fans think Spurs fans are entitled. We are about where we should be; trying to get into CL. Return on investment (in terms of recruitment) over the long run is what matters; because hopefully the gems will outweigh the flops.
DL's last 20 years had seen us rise from the Sugar era, to being where we should be. If you want him out, then you are asking for ownership to be flipped to someone more willing to spend; this makes sense, because short of being sovergin-backed, the fire-power is unlikely to change in the short term (and even it's flipped the money may never come).
I think DL-out is pre-mature.
Maybe, but the fact that Conte wouldn’t sign a new contract tells you all you need to know.I always take ITK with a healthy dose of salt. You only have to read through the past transfer window ITK threads to see that whilst the information passed on is done with the best of intentions "things often change".
I feel the DL scape-goating is unfair. I expect alot of 'disagrees' but here we go:
1) Chelsea and Liverpool, clubs with more money and a better squad, are both below us currently.
2) Arsenal, widely ridiculed last season and the season before, are now title contenders
3) Man Utd was in the shits just before WC and has been for the last decade.
This tells you a couple of things:
1) Inherent problems in a squad take just more than money to fix. Chelsea's longstanding striker-problem was not solved, latest victim = Lukaku who we know is quality given what he did for Man Utd. Liverpool's TAA problem is being targeted (despite him being PL's best offensive fullback and is better than anything we ever had).
2) Patience matters. Arteta is prime example of that.
3) Spending big short term is not the answer. Everton backed Anchelotti wrongly, bring in his players, and has been struggling since.
Conclusions:
1) Consistently spending big is a pre-requisite to stay competitive
2) Willingness to spend may still result in failure as seen by Man Utd + Chelsea. We have our share of flops.
3) Consistently being within CL is an achievemnt in itself; it's about where we should be given our wage spend. Few fans appreciate this.
4) Our financial muscle will likely be bolstered by the new stadium but we've only had it recently. We haven't made enough money (saving) off it to justify spending big. Spending what you don't currently have is not prudent, and football is a long game.
Therefore it's reasonable that other fans think Spurs fans are entitled. We are about where we should be; trying to get into CL. Return on investment (in terms of recruitment) over the long run is what matters; because hopefully the gems will outweigh the flops.
DL's last 20 years had seen us rise from the Sugar era, to being where we should be. If you want him out, then you are asking for ownership to be flipped to someone more willing to spend; this makes sense, because short of being sovergin-backed, the fire-power is unlikely to change in the short term (and even it's flipped the money may never come).
I think DL-out is pre-mature.
Bro, 1 cup in 20+ years and we're still playing Ben Davies and Eric Dier after almost 9 years of failure. Everything is moot. The bald tyrant has to go.I feel the DL scape-goating is unfair. I expect alot of 'disagrees' but here we go:
1) Chelsea and Liverpool, clubs with more money and a better squad, are both below us currently.
2) Arsenal, widely ridiculed last season and the season before, are now title contenders
3) Man Utd was in the shits just before WC and has been for the last decade.
This tells you a couple of things:
1) Inherent problems in a squad take just more than money to fix. Chelsea's longstanding striker-problem was not solved, latest victim = Lukaku who we know is quality given what he did for Man Utd. Liverpool's TAA problem is being targeted (despite him being PL's best offensive fullback and is better than anything we ever had).
2) Patience matters. Arteta is prime example of that.
3) Spending big short term is not the answer. Everton backed Anchelotti wrongly, bring in his players, and has been struggling since.
Conclusions:
1) Consistently spending big is a pre-requisite to stay competitive
2) Willingness to spend may still result in failure as seen by Man Utd + Chelsea. We have our share of flops.
3) Consistently being within CL is an achievemnt in itself; it's about where we should be given our wage spend. Few fans appreciate this.
4) Our financial muscle will likely be bolstered by the new stadium but we've only had it recently. We haven't made enough money (saving) off it to justify spending big. Spending what you don't currently have is not prudent, and football is a long game.
Therefore it's reasonable that other fans think Spurs fans are entitled. We are about where we should be; trying to get into CL. Return on investment (in terms of recruitment) over the long run is what matters; because hopefully the gems will outweigh the flops.
DL's last 20 years had seen us rise from the Sugar era, to being where we should be. If you want him out, then you are asking for ownership to be flipped to someone more willing to spend; this makes sense, because short of being sovergin-backed, the fire-power is unlikely to change in the short term (and even it's flipped the money may never come).
I think DL-out is pre-mature.