- Jun 8, 2003
- 5,918
- 5,276
Small contradiction there. Those margins are also what this alternative table tries to reduce. If the table doesn't lie, then why don't we just wrap it up now rather than play 13 more matches?I disagree. After 25 matches, the table doesn't lie (beyond mere margins).
Why not? Do you not think that Arsenal's preceived easier run in gives them an advantge? Would you not swap remaining matches left if you had the chance?It doesn't really matter if not all teams have met the exact same opponent the same amount of times.
Correct. And that is by definition what the league table does. What this alternative table tries to do is predict the outcome after 38 matches.There are so many other variables that influence the standings beyond the name of the opponents you've met. The present table is the best at showing how good a club is performing relative to all other opponents.
Say we are 1 point ahead of Arsenal going into the last round. We're playing Chelsea away, Arsenal is playing Leicester at home. The league table that according to your argument definitely doesn't lie after 37 matches has us finishing above Arsenal. This alternative table has us finishing below. I know which one I would back.
The alternative table merely puts probability weights on different outcomes rather than assuming everyone will do exactly the same for the remainder of the season - opposition irrelevant. It is harder to amass points away to the top 13 sides in the league than other matches - I don't understand who will argue that.