What's new

Spurs and Chelsea fined

TGE

Active Member
Apr 21, 2016
122
147
I suspect it's because chelsea have been repeat offenders


Oh and that theyre ****s ... you pay a premium for being **** like
 

kursaal

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
2,282
7,974
I wonder if the authorities had access to film in the tunnel?
 

thinktank

Hmmm...
Sep 28, 2004
45,893
68,893
Interestingly they were fined 375k while we got 225k
Well, well, well. If that's the case they can fucking reduce 'bele's ban, the xxxxs, as it's now obviously clear to the FA who the main protagonists were.
 

NeverRed

Active Member
Mar 24, 2005
711
895
FA does base fees on number of repeat offences within 12 months for rule 47 breach (or whatever number it is).

It's at least chelsea's 3rd or 4th offense in 12 months (gives an inkling as to what they are about)

Spurs, it's the 2nd after it happened earlier this year vs wba, another repetitive offender
 

glacierSpurs

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2013
16,163
25,473
just a couple of days' wages off from some of the scumbags at chelscum and there can still have change for FA to buy some printing papers, files and folders for archival purposes..

geez, deterrence? repeated offenses? fines? seriously?
 

Wheeler Dealer

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2011
6,924
12,438
Not a great couple of days for Levy.. £1.2m lost as a consequence of 3rd and not 2nd and then a £225K fine to cap it off for fine measures.
 

paulcumpstone

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2008
8,781
10,892
i still think fabnoclass should have got a ban, trying to fake a stamp on his hand by grabbing lamela's leg is such a dog trick, typical of chelsea but for me these are the cheating acts the FA should be punishing and helping the refs out
 
Top