What's new

Match Ratings Ratings vs West Ham

Player of the Match

  • Team Work

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 2 2.5%
  • None Deserved

    Votes: 7 8.9%
  • Vicario

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • Porro

    Votes: 46 58.2%
  • Romero

    Votes: 7 8.9%
  • Davies

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • Udogie

    Votes: 4 5.1%
  • Hojbjerg

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Bissouma

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lo Celso

    Votes: 6 7.6%
  • Johnson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kulusevski

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • Son (C)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Richarlison

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Gill

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Skipp

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sarr

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Veliz

    Votes: 1 1.3%

  • Total voters


The Reasonable Advocate
Match Thread Admin
Oct 17, 2006
For your post match assessments and ratings

Names will be added to poll as soon as known


Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2006
To me Richarlison weakest link despite Kulu having nightmare and Udogie gifting the winning goal. Missed sitter and offered absolutely nothing going forward after that.


SC Supporter
Jan 18, 2005
West Ham were outrageously lucky with those two goals but we were our own enemy. Once again, terrible against a low block and hideously lacking in ideas in and around the box.

Kulusevski was absolutely awful. So predictable what he’s going to do every time.

Johnson also wasteful in good areas.

We are crying out for a 1v1 specialist with pace who can beat a man in a wide area and cause chaos. I don’t think we have one player who can do that and it makes games like this such a tough watch/ask.

Porro was the only player who maintained the intensity for the full 90, so was my MOTM.

We desperately need to get Madison back in this team


Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2013
Porro for me. Thought Udogie played very well too, goal aside.

Feel Johnson is getting some unecessary stick. He didn’t play well, I agree, but looks like a young kid trying his best and it not quite coming off yet. I like the way he tries to get balls played across the box as early as possible. Just needs a bit more composure and the confidence to hold the ball a little longer sometimes before snatching at a shot of playing the ball before anyone else has got into the box.

Gilzean at the near post

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
Porro clearly MoM for me. I like players whipping crosses in and good to see a right footed player on the right. I feel our wingers would be more effective if they weren't inverted meening they cut in too much


Well-Known Member
May 17, 2004
We flattered to deceive in the first half. Good incisive build up play but zero end producț. When it was only 1-0 at half time the danger was that West Ham would re group and adjust tactically just like Wolves and Especially Villa did.
Overall only Lo Celso, Porro and Udogie performed well throughout. Why Lo Celso was taken off for Skipp was almost unbelievable.


Well-Known Member
May 17, 2004
Vicario 5, Porro 8, Romero 6, Davies 5, Udogie 7, Hjojberg 5, Lo Celso 7, Bissouma 5, Kulu 3, Son 4 , Johnson 4, Richarlison 4, Skipp 3, Sarr 5, Postecoglu 4


Well-Known Member
Aug 6, 2004
Well two home games this year Chelsea did west ham i think I'll stay at home for the renainder.
Johnson ans son were poor , udogie and romeo looked great. Lots of possession but little penetration. Depressing day tbh.


Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2010
Porro best of a bad bunch. Front line completely ineffective. Gio was tidy enough. Would love to erase this from the memory.


Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2006
Was going to give it to undogie until that back pass, gave my vote to Porro instead.