What's new

Match Ratings Ratings vs Fulham

Player of the Match

  • Team Effort

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • None Deserved

    Votes: 58 51.3%
  • Vicario

    Votes: 18 15.9%
  • Porro

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Romero

    Votes: 8 7.1%
  • Dragusin

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • Udogie

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • Sarr

    Votes: 3 2.7%
  • Bissouma

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Maddison

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Son (C)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kulusevski

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Johnson

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Werner

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • Bentancur

    Votes: 7 6.2%
  • Hojbjerg

    Votes: 6 5.3%
  • Richarlison

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lo Celso

    Votes: 1 0.9%

  • Total voters
    113

Bulletspur

The Reasonable Advocate
Match Thread Admin
Oct 17, 2006
10,714
25,307
For your post match assessments and ratings

Names will be added to the poll once they are known
 
Last edited:

Bulletspur

The Reasonable Advocate
Match Thread Admin
Oct 17, 2006
10,714
25,307
We were as bad this week as we were good last week against Villa. Was last week's performance an anomaly? Nuff said
 
Last edited:

Nerine

Juicy corned beef
Jan 27, 2011
4,898
17,935
Saw an improvement in midfield dominance when Bentancur came on so I’ll just go for him being the least worst and for having an impact on the game.
 

Misfit

President of The Niles Crane Fanclub
May 7, 2006
21,416
35,610
Seeing as firing squad is not an option I shall refrain from voting.
 

FinnYid

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2006
4,581
4,195
Zero to most of them, we have squad, quite a few from XI need to move to the bench for next game.

Dragusin should start only instead of Romero, not as lcb.
 

nferno

Waiting for England to finally win the Euros-2024?
Jan 7, 2007
7,118
10,251
0s all around. I wonder how many of our players were fasting, because there was a noticeable lack of desire and energy in that performance.
 

Wick3d

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
5,612
12,020
It was a proper stinker today from the team. Zeros all around.
 

Oscar22

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2004
16,938
15,707
Were we playing again next week I’d actually be ok with Bentancur and Hojbjerg replacing Bissouma and Maddison. The two of them came on we looked better.

The problem being that we were so poor all over the field it’s hard to judge how much anyone really needed to do to be an improvement.

Of the starting 11, not sure anyone gets more than a 3 or 4 for me. Same for Ange too if I’m honest, I also feel he carries his share of the blame for that one as well. Far, far, far too passive and watched the game disappear over the hill before lifting a finger.
 

PLTuck

Eternal Optimist
Aug 22, 2006
16,139
33,771
I'm not one for hyperbole but that was piss poor. Second best all over the pitch. Worst performance under Ange by some distance.

Staying positive in the big picture though.

Next.
 

Dannyspur

I just don't know anymore!
Aug 17, 2004
10,167
13,927
So many players off their game. Finishing was unbelievably poor. Clear chances for Sonny, Maddison, several for Johnson and add in the misses by Werner and Richarleson, even though we were abysmal, we still had enough chances to win. Bissouma, Kulu and Son were terrible. The rest of the starters were below average. Bentancur was the only player who looked like he was interested and could make things happen. PEH was ok.
 

Kirito

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
5,036
9,972
Team effort to lose 3-0

Vic - 5
Feel like he could have done better with the 3rd but not much else he could do
Udogie - 6
Should have had an assist for Maddison but got caught defensively a couple of times
Dragusin - 3
Debut to forget, caught out a bunch, too slow to react for the 3rd. Passed the ball to no one a few times. Hopefully just nerves
Romero - 6
Solid
Porro - 5
Poor delivery, poor in defence, bad game
Bissouma - 2
How does this guy keep getting starts? Weak in the challenge and passes sideways and backwards. A cool looking Harry Winks
Sarr - 5
Good energy but lacked quality today
Maddison - 5
Should have scored, another chance that could have changed things if it goes in. Didn’t get involved eno
Johnson - 5
Should have scored in the first half or at least made the keeper work. Just didn’t seem up for it like the Villa game
Kulusevski - 5
Always takes one touch too many, like he thinks he’s prime Messi and wants to dance through the defence. Good work-rate but poor overall
Son - 4
Lower rating than the other attackers because he should have finished the chance he had, one of the best finishers in the world and if he doesn’t put those away then he’s probably having an off game

All 3 subs played better than the players they came on for. Werner got some stick for missing the chance but still looked more dangerous than anyone else

Bentancur - 7
Hojbjerg - 7
Werner - 6
 

Sp3akerboxxx

Adoption: Nabil Bentaleb
Apr 4, 2006
5,428
8,184
We were as bad this week as we were good last week against Villa. Was last week's performance an anomaly? Nuff said

You could just as easily day that we were as bad for 90 mins this game as we were for the first 45 mins against villa
 

eddiev14

SC Supporter
Jan 18, 2005
7,182
19,717
That was absolutely woeful. Every time this football club put itself in a position to take advantage, it fails. That’s how it feels, and I‘M sorry but with that lineup we have to be beating Fulham.

The only learnings I took from that was Dragusin is not a lcb, Palinha is better than Bissouma at winning the ball and Kulusevski won’t make anything happen unless he has space and time.

We clearly have so much work to do.
 

parj

NDombelly ate all the pies
Jul 27, 2003
3,752
6,153
I went for lo celso simply cos he was last on the pitch.

What a sh!t performance.
 

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,931
334,834
I'm not one for hyperbole but that was piss poor. Second best all over the pitch. Worst performance under Ange by some distance.

Staying positive in the big picture though.

Next.
That's not hyperbole mate, that's just straight up facts.
 

Wick3d

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
5,612
12,020
That Werner chance was shocking; he really should have at least scored that. But that was the game today, really. We were so poor; I hope we don't repeat this type of performance again.
 

PaulM

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2005
571
2,438
Saw an improvement in midfield dominance when Bentancur came on so I’ll just go for him being the least worst and for having an impact on the game.
He wasn't particularly brilliant but was tidy and didn't make any fuck ups like a lot of lads so I voted him too.

I couldn't believe it when he had the ball and looked for a pass for about 5 seconds. Go absolutely nothing in terms of movement and had to play safe. You could see he was pissed off. That was absolutely unacceptable from our players.
 

kendoddsdadsdogsdead

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2011
2,224
3,775
Fulham were aggressive and snapped into challenges. Games like that, Sons touch completely goes. More concerned about a challenge coming in, same with Johnson.

Udogie was non existent in both ends of the pitch Sarr loose on the ball like Son/Johnson. Bisoumma poor. Kulu holding onto the ball too long. Two weeks to stew on it
 

NEVILLEB

Well-Known Member
Nov 6, 2006
6,819
6,467
Sarr should have got goal side for their first goal. He thinks he doesn’t have to guard the defence.
 

Attachments

  • 881A2A6F-B226-41CB-8CA3-C657D251C5E8.jpeg
    881A2A6F-B226-41CB-8CA3-C657D251C5E8.jpeg
    356.2 KB · Views: 69

Similar threads

Top