- May 11, 2005
- 1,879
- 1,681
Strawman argument, and you know it.As opposed to all the other nations that have previously hosted world cups where "corruption" simply doesn't exist?!
Strawman argument, and you know it.As opposed to all the other nations that have previously hosted world cups where "corruption" simply doesn't exist?!
Well none of those countries should be awarded any international tournaments while they practice labour exploitation. And yes, it really is that simple.I appreciate the concern over foreign workers and I agree that their treatment is nothing short of horrific.......BUT the abuse of foreign workers is common practice throughout most of the Middle East (including in Saudi Arabia, UAE and even Israel!). It doesn't make it any more acceptable but I don't see why people use this particular stick to beat Qatar alone.
Secondly, I don't think people on this forum appreciate the plight of some of the asian workers who go to places like Qatar for work. Their situation back home is often desperate and they opt to work abroad knowing full well the risks they are taking. For most of them, the world cup in Qatar is a lifeline and provides an opportunity to support their families back home so that they don't have to go through the same vicious cycle of being exploited for labour. We need to get off our moral high horse and admit the reality that this world is horribly unjust and that people in other places don't enjoy the same privileges that we are used to.
I appreciate the concern over foreign workers and I agree that their treatment is nothing short of horrific.......BUT the abuse of foreign workers is common practice throughout most of the Middle East (including in Saudi Arabia, UAE and even Israel!). It doesn't make it any more acceptable but I don't see why people use this particular stick to beat Qatar alone.
Precisely.To be fair those countries aren't supposed to be hosting the world cup. Nobody is saying that it's only wrong when Qatar do it, they're saying it's wrong regardless of who does it and therefore a country that does it shouldn't be awarded the WC
You are so correct, but South Africa didn't have OIL and GAS.Well none of those countries should be awarded any international tournaments while they practice labour exploitation. And yes, it really is that simple.
Sporting boycott helped end Apartheid, it can help end this as well but it seems nobody has the moral inclination to take a stand.
Speak for yourself. I won't be, as I saw at first hand what a corrupt, venal bunch of aunts they are.
Yes, when push comes to show (do you mean shove?) people are gonna watch. But I was in Qatar when they stole/bribed this and knew some of those involved, so, no, I won't be one of those gonna watch.don’t you wanna support your team? Imagine them crying in bed at night knowing that you weren’t there and had their backs
my point being; when push comes to show, people are gonna watch.
Yes, when push comes to show (do you mean shove?) people are gonna watch. But I was in Qatar when they stole/bribed this and knew some of those involved, so, no, I won't be one of those gonna watch.
don’t you wanna support your team? Imagine them crying in bed at night knowing that you weren’t there and had their backs
my point being; when push comes to show, people are gonna watch.
Couldnt agree more. In the end, the stance of the international football fan should be this:Well none of those countries should be awarded any international tournaments while they practice labour exploitation. And yes, it really is that simple.
Sporting boycott helped end Apartheid, it can help end this as well but it seems nobody has the moral inclination to take a stand.
The simple fact is that any nation's footballing governing body, as well staff and players, could be charged with being part of a massive human trafficking operation, slavery and thousands of murders. Unfortunately the law doesnt generally apply to the rich and powerful.Of course people will. On terms of boycotting the right thing to do would've been for the "big" nations to refuse to participate. A few random fans saying they're boycotting is just bollocks and nobody will care.
When it was awarded to Qatar, the big nations should've got behind the investigation into the corruption and when it became blatantly obvious how corrupt the voting was, they should've boycotted. There's plenty of grounds for it given how ridiculously unsuitable a host they are.
They even got a second chance to do it when it came out that the stadiums were being essentially built by slaves, some of whole were dying in the process. But nope, they all sat in silence.
At this stage it's definitely going ahead and will probably be a big success. They'll have state of the art stadiums, the big teams will all be there, everyone will be staying in luxury hotels, all the random no drinking laws etc will be relaxed etc. And everyone will conveniently forget about all the horrors of that horrific place temporarily because ultimately people are more bothered about their own enjoyment and making money than they are about doing the right thing.
Yep. The apposite word is 'privilege'. Etymology of the word 'privilege'? It comes to us from Latin in which it translates as 'private law'.The simple fact is that any nation's footballing governing body, as well staff and players, could be charged with being part of a massive human trafficking operation, slavery and thousands of murders. Unfortunately the law doesnt generally apply to the rich and powerful.
don’t you wanna support your team? Imagine them crying in bed at night knowing that you weren’t there and had their backs
my point being; when push comes to show, people are gonna watch.
Would you like to demonstrate your high moral principles and name n shame all of the guilty parties that you know of?Yes, when push comes to show (do you mean shove?) people are gonna watch. But I was in Qatar when they stole/bribed this and knew some of those involved, so, no, I won't be one of those gonna watch.
How do you know I haven't already done so, but not on a public forum? Am I to assume that you don't believe that I was indeed there and knew some of those involved?Would you like to demonstrate your high moral principles and name n shame all of the guilty parties that you know of?
just the response I expectedHow do you know I haven't already done so, but not on a public forum? Am I to assume that you don't believe that I was indeed there and knew some of those involved?
You're welcome!just the response I expected