- Jan 26, 2005
- 3,784
- 9,630
To be honest I think hoijberg has too many critics on this site, he has been just as good as bentancur since he's joined. He is just not as pleasing on the eye.IMHO Hojbjerg has improved as he’s not having to babysit Winks (thus spreading himself too thin).
He is very effective.
Skipp adds a bit more bite and aggression as well as underrated quality on the ball. When he gets back we have three players to play those two midfielder roles.
For me I am not really worried as long as two out of the three start.
The huge problem with winks is what he offers (or doesn't) off the ball. He doesn't tackle, doesn't press and doesn't cover the spaces, he has a habit of dropping deep. Which leaves the other midfielder with a lot of work to do.
Where as the other three all press high and watching bentancur and hoijberg, they seem to take it in turns. They seem to have created a partnership in no time.
For the first time in years I am happy (or will be when Skipp returns) with our midfield options.
This was always our problem, Nuno had to play Dele as a cm just to cover this problem. José had to sit deep and we struggled to get out.
Bentancur is exactly the player that we have been crying out for.
Against West ham we looked a proper team, a team with quality in possession. I haven't said that about a spurs team for a long time.
Bentancur, kuvuleski and even Doherty have made this possible.