- Jul 24, 2013
- 15,292
- 47,828
Some of his control and touches were so slick, which is an obvious sign his fitness is getting back to where it's needed.
What's happened to him? I hope it's just the injuries taking their toll and he'll bounce back next season. He looks a shadow of the player that controlled games almost single-handedly at times pre injury.
What's happened to him? I hope it's just the injuries taking their toll and he'll bounce back next season. He looks a shadow of the player that controlled games almost single-handedly at times pre injury.
What's happened to him? I hope it's just the injuries taking their toll and he'll bounce back next season. He looks a shadow of the player that controlled games almost single-handedly at times pre injury.
Sarr looked lively when he came on. We've missed his energy but he can at times get caught pressing out and leave us exposed. I think Hojbjerg was there to plug the holes. I do wonder though if a midfield 3 is going to work better with a 6 and 2 box to box midfielders each side. If Bentancur can get back to his old ways he can be one of the box to box ones but for now seems better suited to the holding role. I think Sarr, GLC and Kulusevski all suit the box to box role either side. Trouble is when Sarr presses out and they play out we have both him and Maddison forward leaving 1 midfielder.He’s getting there. Anyone playing next to PEH has extra work to do, as he hides.
Sarr was the right pick at the weekend though- big mistake not to start him.
See what you mean. Risk and reward pressing high, but i’d back both Sarr and Bents to succeed with turnovers. I’m not having Kulu though, many said he played well. I thought he was ineffective again and Johnson unlucky to be benchedSarr looked lively when he came on. We've missed his energy but he can at times get caught pressing out and leave us exposed. I think Hojbjerg was there to plug the holes. I do wonder though if a midfield 3 is going to work better with a 6 and 2 box to box midfielders each side. If Bentancur can get back to his old ways he can be one of the box to box ones but for now seems better suited to the holding role. I think Sarr, GLC and Kulusevski all suit the box to box role either side. Trouble is when Sarr presses out and they play out we have both him and Maddison forward leaving 1 midfielder.
Thought his link to paiy and touches were better than of late but he's quite one paced ATM. That might improve with sharpness and confidence in his body but as you say he may never be an ideal player in Ange's midfield.Was plain terrible tonight, but that is beside the point. Is he right kind of midfielder for way Ange wants to play?