- Jan 28, 2011
- 14,103
- 18,458
Fair enough. Although I do think stats like that are incredibly narrow and often don't prove much. If both Richarlison and Bergwijn were playing a similar amount of minutes per season then maybe it starts to become interesting. But if SB is playing a very limited number of minutes there is a reason for that which the stat alone doesn't take into account.Oh, I agree about player valuations completely - if I was Everton i wouldn't be letting him go for anything under £60m, and I wouldn't be letting Gordon go at all. If that's what he's worth to them then that's what he's worth in the market. Whether he's worth that to US is a different story and is subjective.
Also, stat was quoted directly to provide context in response to someone saying Bergwijn was shit because he played 60 games and had X number of goals, when in reality he's probably only played 30 90s or something.
Same people who ovelook the fact Jesus has been playing at Man City when they look at his stats and that he'll be moving to a worse team and a worse coach.Its funny how people completely ignore the fact that he can improve leaps and bounds playing in a significantly better team and under one of the best coaches in world football.
I agree with you on your last point, Richarlison.. firstly this story is driven by the press , I'm not saying that AC is not interested in Richarlison, however he's only one of the options their looking at .... all this talk of agreement is driven today by the Sun and this purporting meet with DL and Kenright , which the sun concluded theirs a deal .. AC & PF have an agenda which their following without listening to the noise and that does not nessacary include Richarlisonsign them all - lets have a party
not one of these stories is driven by the sun, there are plenty of articles from very reputable journalists from all 3 days saying a deal is closeI agree with you on your last point, Richarlison.. firstly this story is driven by the press , I'm not saying that AC is not interested in Richarlison, however he's only one of the options their looking at .... all this talk of agreement is driven today by the Sun and this purporting meet with DL and Kenright , which the sun concluded theirs a deal .. AC & PF have an agenda which their following without listening to the noise and that does not nessacary include Richarlison
"We hunt together!"Really hope Romero and Richarlison keep a truce in training.
Well we see pretty soonnot one of these stories is driven by the sun, there are plenty of articles from very reputable journalists from all 3 days saying a deal is close
Only if true, not saying it isnt by the wayThis is that same article from earlier in the thread.
Promising news regardless.
And the ones complaining would probably be the ones moaning that we show no ambition if Chelsea snapped him up at 60mSpend years not signing a long term solution up front. Get linked to a premier league proven centre forward who ticks all the right boxes. People complain its too expensive
Richarlison is one of those players who worries me when he's on the opposition team sheet as I know he can hurt us. I think he'd do well for us.
Mate you've been downplaying the links all week. Today we've got about 6 different sources saying we're pushing ahead with the deal, including a number of Brazilian journos that initially broke our interest, and yet you're still putting some negative spin on it. I don't really get it?I agree with you on your last point, Richarlison.. firstly this story is driven by the press , I'm not saying that AC is not interested in Richarlison, however he's only one of the options their looking at .... all this talk of agreement is driven today by the Sun and this purporting meet with DL and Kenright , which the sun concluded theirs a deal .. AC & PF have an agenda which their following without listening to the noise and that does not nessacary include Richarlison
We’ve been linked with a number of pacey dribbler types. There was Diaz in January, and Saint-Maximim, Raphinha, and Gordon so far this summer. That appears to be the profile of a player that is still on Paratici’s list.Intrigued to find out if people believe Richarlison would be enough in the forward positions. Perisic could cover of course, but with Sessegnon's injury troubles we're maybe still a little on the light side at LWB if it's for a long period. Might be worth keeping Troy Parrott or Reguilon around.