- Jul 4, 2012
- 1,677
- 1,985
The Saints guy is from Winchester, so that might narrow it down a bit ?I'm just wondering what his username is on here.
The Saints guy is from Winchester, so that might narrow it down a bit ?I'm just wondering what his username is on here.
You’d get the same treatment to if you hadn’t retiredNot according to A&C
And to be fair he'd know, he assured me it was a legit procedure to getting my blue badgeNot according to A&C
And to be fair he'd know, he assured me it was a legit procedure to getting my blue badge
You can get one of those when you get old like me, but you have to have a disability as well unfortunately.And to be fair he'd know, he assured me it was a legit procedure to getting my blue badge
And to be fair he'd know, he assured me it was a legit procedure to getting my blue badge
Good to see the wily vulpes vulpes in the house tonightNot according to A&C
Is that the Quiche Lorraine song???......For you
When the rain starts to fall
Naff
Whatever happened to Ben?
This true that my farts have a sweeter fragrance than most of you common folk!
I just bought a crap used car. I haven't received it yet, but even if I know the experience of driving it will be rather boring as I wait I'm getting more and more impatient. Reminds me a bit about Højbjerg. Not suggesting he is a crap used car, but it might feel like that when we are starting to realize how poor his passing is
People are talking about him as if he were Freund or Brown. His passing and technique are fine for the role he plays, and will be better with us as passing stats are affected by the quality of the player receiving the pass. He isn’t going to transform into Hoddle once we get him, but he doesn’t need to. He’s being signed to make sure we win the ball more often, in the right areas, so that we can spring attacks effectively. We currently have nobody to do this, and so when another team attacks us the ball almost always reaches our penalty area.
We'll see.
I'm all for getting Højbjerg. I like him. But I do believe there is a big question mark around his passing playing for a team that will have to expect being in possession against "smaller" teams. For me it is not a given that Højbjerg will be the one that always play.
I agree it’s not a given he’ll play every game but I imagine he’ll play most. I imagine that apart from matches v the most defensive sides we’ll have him and Lo Celso as 2 of the 3 midfielders predominantly.We'll see.
I'm all for getting Højbjerg. I like him. But I do believe there is a big question mark around his passing playing for a team that will have to expect being in possession against "smaller" teams. For me it is not a given that Højbjerg will be the one that always play.