- Aug 31, 2012
- 4,009
- 10,529
iirc we are always open to sell him. the transfer did not ever happen because of his injuriesGlad to hear the reports were finally open to selling him. Been a few years too long.
iirc we are always open to sell him. the transfer did not ever happen because of his injuriesGlad to hear the reports were finally open to selling him. Been a few years too long.
Are we not allowed to work on multiple parts of the squad at the same time?We have far greater issues than whether we sell Lamela, especially when Eriksen's off.
Absolutely, but getting rid of a decent player (injuries aside) when we're losing Eriksen isn't a good idea, especially when we're supposedly not bringing in anybody of note.Are we not allowed to work on multiple parts of the squad at the same time?
Why?be abig mistake
doesn't mean that he is indispensable thoughThere are quite a few I would rather us sell than Lamela
Who said he wasn't? No one is indispensabledoesn't mean that he is indispensable though
There are quite a few I would rather us sell than Lamela
Me too but I sometimes write with my heart and not my head!IMO it's entirely dependant on what we would do with the non HG squad space he would vacate. Love his attitude but his overall contribution has been so hit and miss that I can see the logic in letting this happen.
i mean we can sell him together with those you rather sellingWho said he wasn't? No one is indispensable
Like who?There are quite a few I would rather us sell than Lamela
Like who?
The question was aimed for a response from original poster. I don't disagree with your list of possible departures. Finding clubs and fees that are acceptable to player and Levy may prove a bit more challenging.Rose, Vertonghen (sadly), Wanyama, Dier, Aurier, Eriksen to name a few.