- Mar 3, 2004
- 5,436
- 6,154
Nah……was Utd’s song for Ryan Giggs. Sorry, not copying them.
Isn’t most songs created, copied from one team or another
Nah……was Utd’s song for Ryan Giggs. Sorry, not copying them.
Just got back from the game. Probably not the first to say this but reminds me very much of Ginola. Especially at one point when on the left side near the touch line one of the Pacos players slid in and he skipped over the challenge and laid the ball off. Beautiful.
You mean Bryn? As in hill in Welsh?Ha! Excellent. I like it.
But, if you don’t mind me saying, there’s actually no need to force it by using the initial B. Scans perfectly well as Bryan because the a in Bryan can be silent.
Agree 100%, someone messaged me at halftime to ask what Gil was like, I just replied "Ginola 2.0". Spurs have some player on our hands hereJust got back from the game. Probably not the first to say this but reminds me very much of Ginola. Especially at one point when on the left side near the touch line one of the Pacos players slid in and he skipped over the challenge and laid the ball off. Beautiful.
Coco is filling in nicely...I know someone asked the question earlier, but why the hell did Sevilla let him go? You cannot convince me that it is because they have better. I would be pissed if I was a fan
I know you tried but that still does not answer the question. I was Coco's biggest fan (check my posts) but Gil is an upgrade on Lamela imo. So if they wanted the best chance to win this year, then isn't it logical they would keep the better player? My question remains unanswered, why did they get rid of him?Coco is filling in nicely...
It might simply be, they wanted the best chance to win this year, rather than in a few years.
I am not ready to declare Gil better than Lamela on the back of a couple of games against lower-level opposition.I know you tried but that still does not answer the question. I was Coco's biggest fan (check my posts) but Gil is an upgrade on Lamela imo. So if they wanted the best chance to win this year, then isn't it logical they would keep the better player? My question remains unanswered, why did they get rid of him?
'Got rid' is the wrong way of looking at it, i think. They are also selling Kounde to Chavs, arguably the top young CB talent in the world who started all season for them last year. Not because they want to but because they have to. They are a selling club and need to fund ongoing operations and wages, especially with the LaLiga financial mess--that isn't just hitting Barca it's hitting every team in the league to at least some degree. So from Sevilla's perspective they get a ready-now player who can help them maintain league position (also key financially) along with cash for a promising but unproven prospect who spent the season on loan at much lower level competition. Sevilla is cashing in on promise/potential in both deals. Arguably it's the right time for a selling club to cash in as there's always a high risk of the shine coming off a big prospect.I know you tried but that still does not answer the question. I was Coco's biggest fan (check my posts) but Gil is an upgrade on Lamela imo. So if they wanted the best chance to win this year, then isn't it logical they would keep the better player? My question remains unanswered, why did they get rid of him?
I understand and this has sort have clarified my query but..... current financial issues aside, I do believe they cashed in too soon, as from what I can see, his stock is going to rise incredibly where we will now benefit not them. I think where I disagree with you @Bluto Blutarsky and Sevilla is that I do think he is ready. You do not get picked by your National team in competitive matches and tournaments on potential. My opinion, as I might be talking crap!!'Got rid' is the wrong way of looking at it, i think. They are also selling Kounde to Chavs, arguably the top young CB talent in the world who started all season for them last year. Not because they want to but because they have to. They are a selling club and need to fund ongoing operations and wages, especially with the LaLiga financial mess--that isn't just hitting Barca it's hitting every team in the league to at least some degree. So from Sevilla's perspective they get a ready-now player who can help them maintain league position (also key financially) along with cash for a promising but unproven prospect who spent the season on loan at much lower level competition. Sevilla is cashing in on promise/potential in both deals. Arguably it's the right time for a selling club to cash in as there's always a high risk of the shine coming off a big prospect.
I know someone asked the question earlier, but why the hell did Sevilla let him go? You cannot convince me that it is because they have better. I would be pissed if I was a fan