Are you going to post this theory in every thread you enter?
I don’t really disagree with it but I feel like I’ve read this about 6 times now. In the case of Sarr though I wouldn’t sell him even if he doesn’t break in to the 11 in the next season or 2, he’s so young and physically far from his peak that he’s going to have way more to offer that we haven’t yet seen and I already think he’s a blinding player for his age
Sorry, I forgot posts in SC aren't repetitive. I'll post the thought to explain my opinion where necessary.Are you going to post this theory in every thread you enter?
Definitely not as repetitive as posting the exact same theory in about 5 different threads, there’s a reason no one has really discussed it with you yet, it’s not an interesting theory or observation and you can’t apply it like a blanket over every individual player. There are circumstances to take into account, like Lo Celso for example I think it would be a big mistake to sell him now we have a manager and system that suits him down to the ground, but under your 3 year theory he should probably go.. it doesn’t make a lot of sense, I have to be honest
As a general rule I don't strongly disagree, but with Sarr and bunch of other players we need to remember that Conte didn't trust anyone outside a core group, and probably not even all of that core group.
It's not a hard rule, but I find it rare for a player to be at the club for 4 seasons, without making an impact, then goes onto do well for us.
He does not need a loan - he's played at a high enough level in Ligue 1.
He's looked decent when he has played for us as well.
