- Jul 1, 2005
- 4,458
- 3,124
From the Sporting life transfer centre (live) section today. From a writer who doesn't sound like a Spurs fan
http://www.sportinglife.com/football/transfer_centre
1255: Time to catch up on the emails. Colin Riley writes: "I think Voronin must have a lot of agents all e-mailing this site! He's 6 from 28 for Liverpool, so enough said for a 30-year-old. Rafa tried to offload him for around £2m last year but there were no takers. I thought some of you guys would have given me lists of top talent, but maybe 10m or less is just impossible? Who do the e-mailers think is the best Value for Money deal so far of the transfer window, and who'll prove to be the worst? I suggest Kyle Naughton may be the best VFM signing, with Roque the worst with his poor goalscoring record and injuries?"
1346: S Dex writes: "Value for money Kyle Naughton? You're having a laugh! We [Everton] agreed a fee for £5million and now Harry has had to pay (a reported) £10million, I have to go with Owen for Man Utd - he seems to be rejuvenated in a way we probably could not have. And I have seen the Saha pictures surely with his woeful heading ability he would want to keep the spotlight away from his slippery bonce."
1520: Colin Riley writes in to say: "I'd just like to clarify why I went for Kyle Naughton as a value buy. Let's say Spurs got him for about 7million. He's very young, big, fast, and already good enough to make the voted-for Championship 11 team. If he improves, Spurs will have a 20m player on their hands in three years.
"So they'll have had him for free maybe, and make a big profit on an Englishman.
http://www.sportinglife.com/football/transfer_centre
1255: Time to catch up on the emails. Colin Riley writes: "I think Voronin must have a lot of agents all e-mailing this site! He's 6 from 28 for Liverpool, so enough said for a 30-year-old. Rafa tried to offload him for around £2m last year but there were no takers. I thought some of you guys would have given me lists of top talent, but maybe 10m or less is just impossible? Who do the e-mailers think is the best Value for Money deal so far of the transfer window, and who'll prove to be the worst? I suggest Kyle Naughton may be the best VFM signing, with Roque the worst with his poor goalscoring record and injuries?"
1346: S Dex writes: "Value for money Kyle Naughton? You're having a laugh! We [Everton] agreed a fee for £5million and now Harry has had to pay (a reported) £10million, I have to go with Owen for Man Utd - he seems to be rejuvenated in a way we probably could not have. And I have seen the Saha pictures surely with his woeful heading ability he would want to keep the spotlight away from his slippery bonce."
1520: Colin Riley writes in to say: "I'd just like to clarify why I went for Kyle Naughton as a value buy. Let's say Spurs got him for about 7million. He's very young, big, fast, and already good enough to make the voted-for Championship 11 team. If he improves, Spurs will have a 20m player on their hands in three years.
"So they'll have had him for free maybe, and make a big profit on an Englishman.