What's new

Harry Kane

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,542
48,825
I think it’s really poor personally that Shaw has been so blatant posting it on his social etc.

Southgate should be having a world tbh, nothing you can do to stop him privately tapping Kane up and showing him round but once he starts putting it on his social media it’s a disciplinary issue for me.
It’s more for man.u to discipline him than England really isn’t it as it’s a club matter not a country one.

Tbh I think it’s just Shaw being a good ambitious player trying to better his club, ofc Rice & Kane would improve Man.U.

It’s our fault the club has fallen back behind man.u since poch times otherwise Kane wouldn’t even be considering them as an option.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,543
147,639
It’s more for man.u to discipline him than England really isn’t it as it’s a club matter not a country one.

Tbh I think it’s just Shaw being a good ambitious player trying to better his club, ofc Rice & Kane would improve Man.U.

It’s our fault the club has fallen back behind man.u since poch times otherwise Kane wouldn’t even be considering them as an option.
Disagree. For all his faults, Southgate has worked hard to change the mentality of England camps to be fully focused on what’s best for the England team. He’s cracked the old club cliques that plagued England squads in the 00s. Players shouldn’t be using England camps to further their club ambitions, it’s unprofessional, and hugely disrespectful to their entire reason for being there.
 

Klinsmannesque

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2013
900
4,665
I think it’s really poor personally that Shaw has been so blatant posting it on his social etc.

Southgate should be having a world tbh, nothing you can do to stop him privately tapping Kane up and showing him round but once he starts putting it on his social media it’s a disciplinary issue for me.
Meh. They are big boys I’m sure Luke Shaw is a very convincing fellow but I’d imagine they could make their own decision.
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,542
48,825
Disagree. For all his faults, Southgate has worked hard to change the mentality of England camps to be fully focused on what’s best for the England team. He’s cracked the old club cliques that plagued England squads in the 00s. Players shouldn’t be using England camps to further their club ambitions, it’s unprofessional, and hugely disrespectful to their entire reason for being there.
Good fair points mate can’t argue with that to be honest
 

DenverSpur

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2011
2,052
5,734
I think it’s really poor personally that Shaw has been so blatant posting it on his social etc.

Southgate should be having a world tbh, nothing you can do to stop him privately tapping Kane up and showing him round but once he starts putting it on his social media it’s a disciplinary issue for me.
ManU players have been tapping up other clubs players at England get togethers for decades/
 

spurs mental

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2007
25,575
50,480

The transfer window has been open a whole week and Man Utd have not made a signing yet! What can Harry Kane do now?



What Man Utd need is a statement signing
This back page from The Sun made Mediawatch smile, because it reminded us of that wonderful time in the summer of 2021 when The Sun’s showbiz reporter declared that Harry Kane was absolutely definitely joining Manchester City for £160m because his brother chose his own wedding day to play his (very poor) hand. Such days. Such fun. The Mediawatch from that sorry episode remains a personal favourite

Mediawatch would rather cynically suggest that Kane has tried very hard to ‘make it happen’ in the past and basically ended up looking like a complete dick. Not quite as much as his brother but still. A dick.

Now this latest piece is written by Manchester United reporter Neil Custis so clearly he is starting from the position that it is Kane or Tottenham’s fault that this transfer is very unlikely to happen and absolutely nothing to do with Manchester United knowing the asking price and refusing to meet it.

That’s their prerogative but the idea that Kane can somehow ‘make this happen’ is absurd. Is he supposed to ask Daniel Levy real nice to drop his asking price by £20m?
FRUSTRATED Manchester United have told Harry Kane: If you want the move, make it happen.

FRUSTRATED Manchester United might be better off telling Daniel Levy that they will pay £100m. Or just giving up on the whole shebang to go and overpay for a different striker target.

United’s hierarchy are ready to walk away from the blockbuster transfer of Kane after difficulties in negotiating with Spurs chairman Daniel Levy.
Can you ‘walk away’ from something that’s not even remotely close to completion? This is like filing for divorce halfway through the appetisers on a first date. The Daily Mail wrote yesterday that ‘the club have ended their interest in Kane for now’ so it might be a little late for an ultimatum.

But in a final attempt to move things on, they want Tottenham’s all-time top goalscorer to come out with a transfer request or strongly worded statement about his desire to leave for Old Trafford.
Because if there is one thing that will move notable hard-arse Levy into selling his most valuable asset for less than his worth (to Spurs, not to Manchester United) it is a ‘strongly worded statement’. Perhaps he could use a swear.

£100m for a player who turns 30 next month with just a year left on his contract.
Sorry Neil, but it doesn’t really matter what you or indeed Manchester United think of that asking price. As somebody wise once wrote: ‘A transfer fee merely captures a moment when the circumstances of two clubs collide.’ This summer – with Spurs needing one more season from Kane to settle nerves, to provide quality and to attract quality – Kane is worth £100m to Tottenham. If he is not worth that to Manchester United, then that is their issue. No ‘strongly worded statement’ will change that.

Their cross-town rivals Manchester City found themselves in a similar situation two years ago when they were willing to offer £100m for Kane with Spurs after £150m.

City also wanted Kane to push for the move but it was felt he did not go far enough to engineer one.

So much to unpick here. Kane and his brother literally used your newspaper to declare a move was ‘inevitable’ by suggesting that Levy had ‘caved’ and would accept £160m. The only question was whether Manchester City or Tottenham was more surprised by this naked attempt to engineer a move. Odd how he might not be ready to try again.
United are already looking at alternatives and have begun tentative negotiations for the potential £52m capture of Atalanta’s Rasmus Hojlund.

Just wait until Custis finds out that Atalanta want £86m for Hojlund. Maybe the Dane needs to try a strongly worded statement.
 

Gbspurs

Gatekeeper for debates, King of the plonkers
Jan 27, 2011
27,017
61,942

The transfer window has been open a whole week and Man Utd have not made a signing yet! What can Harry Kane do now?



What Man Utd need is a statement signing
This back page from The Sun made Mediawatch smile, because it reminded us of that wonderful time in the summer of 2021 when The Sun’s showbiz reporter declared that Harry Kane was absolutely definitely joining Manchester City for £160m because his brother chose his own wedding day to play his (very poor) hand. Such days. Such fun. The Mediawatch from that sorry episode remains a personal favourite

Mediawatch would rather cynically suggest that Kane has tried very hard to ‘make it happen’ in the past and basically ended up looking like a complete dick. Not quite as much as his brother but still. A dick.

Now this latest piece is written by Manchester United reporter Neil Custis so clearly he is starting from the position that it is Kane or Tottenham’s fault that this transfer is very unlikely to happen and absolutely nothing to do with Manchester United knowing the asking price and refusing to meet it.

That’s their prerogative but the idea that Kane can somehow ‘make this happen’ is absurd. Is he supposed to ask Daniel Levy real nice to drop his asking price by £20m?
FRUSTRATED Manchester United have told Harry Kane: If you want the move, make it happen.

FRUSTRATED Manchester United might be better off telling Daniel Levy that they will pay £100m. Or just giving up on the whole shebang to go and overpay for a different striker target.


Can you ‘walk away’ from something that’s not even remotely close to completion? This is like filing for divorce halfway through the appetisers on a first date. The Daily Mail wrote yesterday that ‘the club have ended their interest in Kane for now’ so it might be a little late for an ultimatum.

But in a final attempt to move things on, they want Tottenham’s all-time top goalscorer to come out with a transfer request or strongly worded statement about his desire to leave for Old Trafford.
Because if there is one thing that will move notable hard-arse Levy into selling his most valuable asset for less than his worth (to Spurs, not to Manchester United) it is a ‘strongly worded statement’. Perhaps he could use a swear.


Sorry Neil, but it doesn’t really matter what you or indeed Manchester United think of that asking price. As somebody wise once wrote: ‘A transfer fee merely captures a moment when the circumstances of two clubs collide.’ This summer – with Spurs needing one more season from Kane to settle nerves, to provide quality and to attract quality – Kane is worth £100m to Tottenham. If he is not worth that to Manchester United, then that is their issue. No ‘strongly worded statement’ will change that.

Their cross-town rivals Manchester City found themselves in a similar situation two years ago when they were willing to offer £100m for Kane with Spurs after £150m.

City also wanted Kane to push for the move but it was felt he did not go far enough to engineer one.

So much to unpick here. Kane and his brother literally used your newspaper to declare a move was ‘inevitable’ by suggesting that Levy had ‘caved’ and would accept £160m. The only question was whether Manchester City or Tottenham was more surprised by this naked attempt to engineer a move. Odd how he might not be ready to try again.
United are already looking at alternatives and have begun tentative negotiations for the potential £52m capture of Atalanta’s Rasmus Hojlund.

Just wait until Custis finds out that Atalanta want £86m for Hojlund. Maybe the Dane needs to try a strongly worded statement.

Kane is easily worth 100m and if any other clubs don't realise that then good.
 

TC18

Lurker
Jan 27, 2011
560
1,747
Just joined a new company and it has the most insufferable Utd fan I have ever come across and I used to work with a few before.

The guy talks as if he has the inside Track on all things Utd. Todays one was how United have told Kane that he needs to hand in a transfer request as Spurs aren’t playing ball.
He asked if I had heard anything on the matter. I said no, however I doubt very much that Kane will hand in any transfer request with 1 year to go on his contract. He got a little bit funny and then went down the classic line that it’s unfair to keep him there, we should allow him to leave.

Now I’ve come to terms with the fact that he’s going to be leaving at some point, but I would now love it if we kept him for another season, it would royally piss this guy off.

I’ll ask next week where he gets his information from, no doubt it will be clubcall.
 

kd2000

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2012
1,502
5,100
Just joined a new company and it has the most insufferable Utd fan I have ever come across and I used to work with a few before.

The guy talks as if he has the inside Track on all things Utd. Todays one was how United have told Kane that he needs to hand in a transfer request as Spurs aren’t playing ball.
He asked if I had heard anything on the matter. I said no, however I doubt very much that Kane will hand in any transfer request with 1 year to go on his contract. He got a little bit funny and then went down the classic line that it’s unfair to keep him there, we should allow him to leave.

Now I’ve come to terms with the fact that he’s going to be leaving at some point, but I would now love it if we kept him for another season, it would royally piss this guy off.

I’ll ask next week where he gets his information from, no doubt it will be clubcall.
Or Teamtalk
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,701
104,998
Just joined a new company and it has the most insufferable Utd fan I have ever come across and I used to work with a few before.

The guy talks as if he has the inside Track on all things Utd. Todays one was how United have told Kane that he needs to hand in a transfer request as Spurs aren’t playing ball.
He asked if I had heard anything on the matter. I said no, however I doubt very much that Kane will hand in any transfer request with 1 year to go on his contract. He got a little bit funny and then went down the classic line that it’s unfair to keep him there, we should allow him to leave.

Now I’ve come to terms with the fact that he’s going to be leaving at some point, but I would now love it if we kept him for another season, it would royally piss this guy off.

I’ll ask next week where he gets his information from, no doubt it will be clubcall.

I once got told by a Man U fan that it was pointless supporting spurs. He was a pal of a mate of mine and we were out drinking. Needless to say when it was my round, I wouldn’t have wanting to be drinking his pint.
 

Crow

Rather Large Member
Jul 13, 2005
1,922
4,511
Breaking News: Harry Kane has yet again attempted to discuss his "Gentleman's Agreement" with Daniel Levy

go-away.gif
 

Guntz

Loves a good meme/gif
Aug 15, 2011
7,423
55,381
I find it hard to believe that Kane has Bayern as his preferred club.

There's also no chance that Levy sells him for less than 100m euros.

 
Top